Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/277,300

IMPLEMENT FOR ADJUSTING SIZE OF ELIZABETHAN COLLAR

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 19, 2025
Examiner
REYES, EDGAR
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
34%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 34% of cases
34%
Career Allow Rate
47 granted / 139 resolved
-18.2% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
174
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 139 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The listing of references in the PCT international search report is not considered to be an information disclosure statement (IDS) complying with 37 CFR 1.98. 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2) requires a legible copy of: (1) each foreign patent; (2) each publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; (3) for each cited pending U.S. application, the application specification including claims, and any drawing of the application, or that portion of the application which caused it to be listed including any claims directed to that portion, unless the cited pending U.S. application is stored in the Image File Wrapper (IFW) system; and (4) all other information, or that portion which caused it to be listed. In addition, each IDS must include a list of all patents, publications, applications, or other information submitted for consideration by the Office (see 37 CFR 1.98(a)(1) and (b)), and MPEP § 609.04(a), subsection I. states, “the list ... must be submitted on a separate paper.” Therefore, the references cited in the international search report have not been considered. Applicant is advised that the date of submission of any item of information in the international search report will be the date of submission of the IDS for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements for the IDS with 37 CFR 1.97, including all timing statement requirements of 37 CFR 1.97(e). See MPEP § 609.05(a). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the number of the convex buttons" in lines 9-10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The Office has interpreted this to reference the structure of “a plurality of the convex buttons” recited in line 7. Applicant should revise either line 7 or lines 8-9 for the purpose of consistency in order to avoid confusion as to whether these structures are meant to be related or different from each other. Claim 2 is rejected due to dependency on claim 1 above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by HAG-r (NPL attached via this Office action, first made available to the public 09/03/2018). Regarding claim 1: HAG-r discloses a size-adjusting device for an Elizabethan collar (Page 1), comprising: convex and concave buttons, each being individual snap components, disposed on the front and back sides of a belt shaped body, wherein: a plurality of the convex buttons are arranged in a horizontal row on the front side of the body, and a number of the concave buttons equal to the number of the convex buttons are respectively disposed on the back side of the body at positions diagonally below each of the convex buttons (as seen on pages 4-6). Regarding claim 2: HAG-r discloses the limitations of claim 1 as shown above, and further discloses wherein an additional concave button is provided on the recessed back side of the body, at a position further outward than the concave button located at the endmost position among the concave buttons (as seen on pages 4-6). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Cited art are within applicant’s related field of Elizabethan collars and extension straps. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDGAR REYES whose telephone number is (571)272-5318. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8-6 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Huson can be reached at 571-270-5301. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /E.R./Examiner, Art Unit 3642 /ASSRES H WOLDEMARYAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Dec 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12564141
VERTICAL FARMING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12550870
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A LIGHTED ANIMAL RESTRAINT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12543672
NUTRIENT SOLUTION RECYCLING PLANT CULTIVATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12527268
VERTICAL FARMING WATERING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12520784
SMART RAFT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING AND IMPROVING WATER QUALITY TO MITIGATE ALGAL BLOOMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
34%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (+37.0%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 139 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month