Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/278,172

LIP GAP ADJUSTING DEVICE, EXTRUSION MOLDING DIE, EXTRUSION MOLDING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR ADJUSTING LIP GAP, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING FILM

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Priority
Mar 16, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCT/JP2021/010695 +1 more
Examiner
LEYSON, JOSEPH S
Art Unit
1744
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The Japan Steel Works Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
490 granted / 743 resolved
+0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
778
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
67.2%
+27.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 743 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 14 and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 14 recites “wherein when the lip gap measured in at least one of the plurality of positions is outside a predetermined range, a movement amount of the output shaft of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip becomes uniform, the movement amount of the output shaft being controlled by a control unit connected to the actuator” (recited in claim 1; note claim 14 is dependent upon claim 1) AND “the control unit configured to control the actuator so that the thickness of the film becomes uniform, based on the thickness of the film measured in each of the plurality of positions” which is not originally disclosed. Such recitations require the control unit to control the actuators to move the die lip so that the lip gap becomes uniform based on the measured lip gap being outside a predetermined range AND so that the thickness of the film becomes uniform based on the measured film thickness. The scope of the recitations includes the control unit controlling the actuators to move the die lip to simultaneously enable both the lip gap and the film thickness to become uniform, which is not originally disclosed and thus is new matter. Claims 16 and 17 recite “a controlling step of controlling actuators of a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms that are disposed in the width direction of the extrusion molding die and configured to locally adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots so that the lip gap and the thickness of the film becomes uniform, based on the lip gap measured in each of the plurality of positions and the thickness of the film measured in each of the plurality of positions” and “wherein when the lip gap or the thickness measured in at least one of the plurality of positions is outside a predetermined range, a movement amount of the output shaft of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip becomes uniform, the movement amount of the output shaft being controlled by a control unit connected to the actuator”, which is not originally disclosed and thus is new matter. The original specification does not disclose controlling the actuators so that both the lip gap and the thickness of the film becomes uniform based on the measured lip gap and the measured film thickness in each of the positions, and does not disclose wherein, when the film thickness measured is outside the predetermined range, the movement amount of the output shaft controlled by the control unit is adjusted so that the lip gap becomes uniform. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 17, line 6, recites “a lip gap” which lacks antecedent basis clarity because it is not clear if it refers to the previously mentioned lip gap or to a new one. The Examiner suggests the following amendments: “[[a]] the lip gap”. Claims 16-17 each recites (emphasis added) “a controlling step of controlling actuators of a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms that are disposed in the width direction of the extrusion molding die and configured to locally adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots so that the lip gap and the thickness of the film becomes uniform, based on lip gap measured in each of the plurality of positions and the thickness of the film measured in each of the plurality of positions,” and “wherein when the lip gap or the thickness measured in at least one of the plurality of positions is outside a predetermined range, a movement amount of the output shaft of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip becomes uniform, the movement amount of the output shaft being controlled by a control unit connected to the actuator”, which is unclear. The first recitations require the lip gap and the thickness of the film to become uniform based on the measured lip gap AND the measured film thickness measured, and the second recitations require the lip gap to become uniform based on the measured lip gap OR the measured film thickness. Thus, it is unclear if the lip gap becomes uniform based (1) on both the measured lip gap and the measured film thickness measured OR (2) on either of these measurements. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 12 is redundant to claim 11 and does not include further claim limitations. Claim 13 is rejected as being dependent upon rejected claim 12. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1 and 7-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) in view of Gross (US 6,475,414) and CN 102744819. Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) discloses a lip adjusting device (figs. 1-2; col. 6, line 63, to col. 9, line 17) configured to adjust a lip gap 121 between a movable lip 101a and a mating lip (not labeled but shown opposite to lip 101a in fig. 1) of an extrusion molding die (fig. 1), the method and the lip gap adjusting device comprising: a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms 109, 110, 105 disposed in a width direction of the extrusion molding die (figs. 1-2) and configured to adjust the lip gap 121 at respective disposition spots (fig. 2), wherein the lip gap adjusting mechanisms each comprise an actuator (including adjustment bolts 109, 110, wherein actuation of the actuator includes manual adjustment by rotating bolt 110; col. 7, lines 30-58; col. 9, lines 10-17), and a coupling member 105 coupling a shaft 109 of the actuator and the movable lip 101a (fig. 1); and a distal end of the coupling member 105 being either threaded into the movable lip 101a or fixed to the movable lip 101a (figs. 1-2; col. 6, line 63, to col. 7, line 58; col. 9, lines 10-17; col. 7, lines 13-20, the coupling members (bolts) 105 are threadably engaged with die casing 101 opposite to extrusion passage surface (i.e., with the die lip as shown in fig. 1) and are fixed by the lock nuts 106), wherein the actuator includes an actuator body 110 and the output shaft is extruded or retracted with respect to the actuator body 110 (fig. 1 shows a portion of the bolt (output shaft) 109 within the bolt (actuator body) 110; col. 7, lines 30-58, the bolt (output shaft) 109 is firmly held not to rotate so that when the bolt (actuator body) 110 is rotated the bolt (output shaft) 109 is extruded (when a portion of the bolt 109 within the bolt 110 moves outside the bolt 110) or retracted (when a portion of the bolt 109 outside of the bolt 110 moves inside the bolt 110) with respect to the bolt (actuator body) 110 by differential screw adjustment of the bolts 109, 110), wherein the coupling member 105 is a rod member 105 (fig. 1) in which one end portion is coupled to the movable lip (figs. 1-2; col. 7, lines 13-20, the bolts (rod members) 105 are threadably engaged with die casing 101 opposite to extrusion passage surface (i.e., with the die lip as shown in fig. 1) and are fixed by the lock nuts 106) and another end portion is coupled to the output shaft 109 of the actuator (fig. 1 shows the another end portion of the rod member 105 coupled to the bolt (output shaft) 109 by structures shown in fig. 1, including springs 108 which enable the rod member 105 and the bolt (output shaft) 109 to remain in contact during movement thereof; col. 7, line 20, to col. 8, line 38), wherein the actuator extrudes or retracts the output shaft 109 (i.e., the actuator enables a movement amount of the output shaft 109) in order to linearly move the coupling member 105, and thereby adjust the lip gap (fig. 1; col. 7, line 1, to col. 8, line 58; the bolt (output shaft) 109 is firmly held not to rotate so that when the bolt (actuator body) 110 is rotated the bolt (output shaft) 109 moves linearly to move the coupling member 105 and thereby adjust the lip gap). However, Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) does not disclose: wherein the lip gap adjusting device is configured to locally adjust the lip gap at each disposition spot based on the lip gap measured in each of a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die corresponding to the disposition spots, and wherein when the lip gap measured in at least one of the plurality of positions is outside a predetermined range, a movement amount of the output shaft of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip becomes uniform, the movement amount of the output shaft being controlled by a control unit connected to the actuator. Gross (US 6,475,414) discloses a lip gap adjusting device (figs. 5-8) configured to adjust a lip gap between a movable lip (e.g., 31b) and a mating lip of an extrusion molding die (figs. 5-8), the lip gap adjusting device comprising a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms 7a, 7b disposed in a width direction of the extrusion molding die (col. 5, lines 9-19, "adjusting screws 7a"; fig. 5 is a sectional view) and configured to adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots (i.e., by the plural adjusting screws 7a) (fig. 8 shows a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms disposed in the width direction of the die), wherein the lip gap adjusting mechanisms each comprise an actuator including an adjusting screw 7a, 7b, wherein the adjusting screws 7a, 7b are rotated by servomotors 11a, 11b and a control unit 19, 20 OR by manual rotation to adjust the lip gap (col. 5, lines 17-19 and lines 31-33; col. 6, lines 36-38). As mentioned above, Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) discloses actuation of the actuator includes manual adjustment by rotating bolt 110. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to modify the rotating bolts 110 of Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) with servomotors and a control unit, as disclosed by Gross (US 6,475,414), because such modifications are known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration for rotating bolts/screws enabling automated control of the actuators. CN 102744819 (see English translation) discloses a lip adjusting device (figs. 1 and 4-6; [0006]-[0051]) configured to adjust a lip gap between a movable lip (fig. 5; lip movable by lip gap adjusting devices 14, 14) and a mating lip (fig. 5, the other lip) of an extrusion molding die (fig. 1), the lip gap adjusting device comprising: a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms 14, 14 (figs. 4-5) disposed in a width direction of the extrusion molding die (fig. 4) and configured to adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots (fig. 4), wherein the lip gap adjusting mechanisms each comprise an actuator 14, 14 (figs. 4-5; [0042]; wherein the lip gap adjusting device is configured to locally adjust the lip gap at each disposition spot based on the lip gap measured in each of a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die corresponding to the disposition spots ([0042]; as shown in fig. 4, there are a plurality of lip gap adjusting devices 14, 14 at the disposition spots in the width direction of the extrusion molding die which locally adjust the lip gap at each disposition spot based on the lip gap measured by a lip gap measuring device 12), and wherein when the lip gap measured in at least one of the plurality of positions is outside a predetermined range, a movement amount of an output shaft (the electromagnet 14 close to the movable lip and connected thereto which moves the movable lip) of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip becomes uniform, the movement amount of the output shaft being controlled by a control unit connected to the actuator (fig. 5; [0042]; when the electromagnets 14 are energized, the electromagnet 14 close to and connected to the moveable lip moves so that the lip gap is adjusted, which movement is controlled by a microprocessor and a control circuit connected to the actuator when the measured lip gap is too large or too small (i.e., outside a predetermined range) so that the lip gap becomes uniform thereby enabling production of an extruded film having uniform thickness [0012], [0016], [0024], [0028], [0042], [0050]-[0051]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify device of Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) wherein the lip gap adjusting device is configured to locally adjust the lip gap at each disposition spot based on the lip gap measured in each of a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die corresponding to the disposition spots, and wherein when the lip gap measured in at least one of the plurality of positions is outside a predetermined range, a movement amount of the output shaft of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip becomes uniform, the movement amount of the output shaft being controlled by a control unit connected to the actuator, as disclosed by CN 102744819, because such a modification is known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration for the device capable of controlling the lip gap to become uniform by feedback control thereby enabling production of an extruded film having uniform thickness. Hattori et al. JS 5,051,082) further discloses the device: (Claim 7) wherein the mating lip is a fixed lip (as shown in fig. 1); (Claim 9) fig. 1 shows an extrusion molding die including the lip gap adjusting device, the movable lip 101a; and the mating lip, as mentioned above; and (Claim 11) fig. 1 shows an extrusion molding apparatus for extruding resin sheet or film (abstract) comprising the extrusion molding die as recited by claim 9, as mentioned above. As to claim 8, Gross (US 6,475,414) further discloses the mating lip being a movable lip different from the movable lip (figs. 7-8; col. 5, line 39 to col. 6, line 16; sheet stacks 2c, 2d are displaceable and at least one flexible wall 2e of a flow channel 1e is flexible; if both are displaceable/flexible then the mating lip is also a movable lip). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the mating lip to be a movable lip different from the movable lip, as disclosed by Gross (US 6,475,414), because such a modification is known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration (two movable lips) for the device known to be operable in the art. As to claim 10, Gross (US 6,475,414) further discloses the extrusion molding die, comprising: a first die block 28d including the movable lip (fig. 7); and a second die block 29d including the movable mating lip (fig. 7), wherein the lip gap adjusting mechanisms include first lip gap adjusting mechanisms, and second lip gap adjusting mechanisms (fig. 7), the first lip adjusting mechanisms are a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms disposed in a width direction of the first die block 28d, and configured to adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots (fig. 7 is a sectional view, and there are a plurality of lip adjusting mechanisms similar to fig. 8), the second lip gap adjusting mechanisms are a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms disposed in a width direction of the second die block 29d, and configured to adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots (fig. 7 is a sectional view, and there are a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms similar to fig. 8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the extrusion molding die with a first and second die block and with first and second lip gap adjustment mechanisms, as disclosed by Gross (US 6,475,414), because such a modification is known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration (die having two movable lips with respective lip gap adjustment mechanisms) for the die known to be operable in the art. Note that it would be further obvious to modify the first and second lip gap adjusting mechanisms with the lip gap adjusting mechanisms as recited by Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082), as mentioned above, because such modifications are known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration for the lip gap adjusting mechanisms known to be operable in the art. As to claims 12-13, CN 102744819 further discloses the device comprising: (Claim12) the control unit configured to control actuators 14, 14 so that a lip gap becomes uniform, based on the lip gap measured in each of a plurality of positions along the width direction of an extrusion molding die, and (Claim 13) further comprising a lip gap measuring unit 12 configured to measure the lip gap in each of the plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die, wherein the control unit controls the actuators so that the lip gap becomes uniform, based on the lip gap measured by the lip gap measuring unit 12 (figs. 1 and 4-6; [0012], [0016], [0024], [0028], [0042], [0050]-[0051]; at a plurality of positions along a width of a die 3, the lip gap is measured by lip gap measuring device 12, and actuators 14, 14 of a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms along the width of the die 3 (fig. 4) adjust the lip gap to that the lip gap becomes uniform based on the lip gap measurements by the lip gap measuring device 12; [0024], "to that the membrane lip gap remains stable"; [0028], "ensure that the lip gap remains unchanged"; [0050] “so that the lip gap is stabilized at 0.16mm”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the control unit, as disclosed by CN 102744819 above, and to further modify the extrusion molding apparatus with and a lip gap measuring unit, as disclosed by CN 102744819, because modifications are known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration for the extrusion molding apparatus capable of controlling the lip gap to become uniform by feedback control thereby enabling production of an extruded film having uniform thickness. As to claim 14, Gross (US 6,475,414) further discloses a thickness sensor 23 configured to measure thickness of a film formed from a molten resin extruded from the lip gap in each of a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die (fig. 8 shows the thickness measuring unit 23 extending along the width direction); and a control unit 20 configured to control the actuator 22 so that the thickness of the film becomes uniform, based on the thickness of the film measured in each of the plurality of positions (fig. 8; col. 6, lines 10-47, control unit 20 controls the actuators 22 and lip gap adjusting mechanisms 14e disposed in the width direction to correct variances (i.e., to make the film uniform) based on the thickness measurements). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the extrusion molding apparatus with a thickness sensor and a control unit, as disclosed by Gross (US 6,475,414), because such a modification is known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration for the extrusion molding apparatus capable of controlling the actuators so that the thickness of the film becomes uniform by feedback control based on the measured film thicknesses. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) in view of Gross (US 6,475,414) and CN 102744819 as applied to claims 1 and 7-14 above, and further in view of Nakano (US 2012/0024226). Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082), Gross (US 6,475,414) and CN 102744819 do not disclose the limitations as recited by claim 6. Nakano (US 2012/0024226) discloses a lip gap adjusting device (figs. 1-5; [0045]-[0059]) configured to adjust a lip gap between a movable lip 3 and a mating lip 5 of an extrusion molding die (fig. 1), the lip gap adjusting device comprising: a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms disposed in a width direction of the extrusion molding die and configured to adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots (fig. 1), wherein the lip gap adjusting mechanisms each comprise an actuator (bellows, linear actuator) 16, and a coupling member 11, 20, and a distal end of the coupling member being either threaded into the movable lip or fixed to the movable lip (figs. 1 and 5 show the coupling member 11, 20 fixed to the movable lip 3), wherein the lip gap adjusting mechanisms include a first lip gap adjusting mechanism, and a second lip gap adjusting mechanism, the first lip gap adjusting mechanism, and the second lip gap adjusting mechanism are alternately disposed in a width direction of the extrusion molding die (as shown fig. 3; the second lip gap adjusting mechanism includes the output shaft 11 and the actuators 16 having the pointing arrows in fig. 3 actuating that output shaft 11, and the first lip gap adjusting mechanism includes the next (to the right in fig. 3 output shaft 11 and respective actuators 16; note that they alternate in the width direction as shown in fig. 3), the first lip gap adjusting mechanism comprises a first actuator 16, and a first coupling member coupling 20 an output shaft 11 of the first actuator 16 and the movable lip 3 to each other (figs. 1-5), the second lip gap adjusting mechanism comprises a second actuator 16, and a second coupling member 20 coupling an output shaft 11 of the second actuator 16 and the movable lip 3 to each other (figs. 1-5), the first actuator is disposed close to the movable lip, and the second actuator is disposed far from the movable lip not to interfere with the first actuator (as shown in figs. 2-3, the lowermost actuator 16 of the first lip gap adjusting mechanism is disposed close to the moveable lip 3 relative to the second actuator 16 of the second lip gap adjusting mechanism being disposed far from the movable lip 3 to as not the interfere with each other). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the device with a first lip gap adjusting mechanism and a second lip gap adjusting mechanism, as recited by Nakano (US 2012/0024226), because such a modification is known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration for adjusting the lip gap known to be operable in the art. Claim(s) 15-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) in view of Gross (US 6,475,414) and CN 102744819. Relative to claims 15-17, Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) discloses a method for manufacturing a film (abstract; col. 1, lines 7-12; figs. 1-2; col. 6, line 63, to col. 9, line 17) including: a step extruding a film formed from a molten resin from a lip gap (abstract) between a movable lip 101a and a mating lip (not labeled but shown opposite to lip 101a in fig. 1) of an extrusion molding die (fig. 1); and a method for adjusting a lip gap 121 using a lip adjusting device (figs. 1-2; col. 6, line 63, to col. 9, line 17) configured to adjust the lip gap 121 between the movable lip 101a and the mating lip (not labeled but shown opposite to lip 101a in fig. 1) of the extrusion molding die (fig. 1), the method and the lip gap adjusting device comprising: a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms 109, 110, 105 disposed in a width direction of the extrusion molding die (figs. 1-2) and configured to adjust the lip gap 121 at respective disposition spots (fig. 2), wherein the lip gap adjusting mechanisms each comprise an actuator (including adjustment bolts 109, 110, wherein actuation of the actuator includes manual adjustment by rotating bolt 110; col. 7, lines 30-58; col. 9, lines 10-17), and a coupling member 105 coupling a shaft 109 of the actuator and the movable lip 101a (fig. 1); and a distal end of the coupling member 105 being either threaded into the movable lip 101a or fixed to the movable lip 101a (figs. 1-2; col. 6, line 63, to col. 7, line 58; col. 9, lines 10-17; col. 7, lines 13-20, the coupling members (bolts) 105 are threadably engaged with die casing 101 opposite to extrusion passage surface (i.e., with the die lip as shown in fig. 1) and are fixed by the lock nuts 106), wherein the actuator includes an actuator body 110 and the output shaft is extruded or retracted with respect to the actuator body 110 (fig. 1 shows a portion of the bolt (output shaft) 109 within the bolt (actuator body) 110; col. 7, lines 30-58, the bolt (output shaft) 109 is firmly held not to rotate so that when the bolt (actuator body) 110 is rotated the bolt (output shaft) 109 is extruded (when a portion of the bolt 109 within the bolt 110 moves outside the bolt 110) or retracted (when a portion of the bolt 109 outside of the bolt 110 moves inside the bolt 110) with respect to the bolt (actuator body) 110 by differential screw adjustment of the bolts 109, 110), wherein the coupling member 105 is a rod member 105 (fig. 1) in which one end portion is coupled to the movable lip (figs. 1-2; col. 7, lines 13-20, the bolts (rod members) 105 are threadably engaged with die casing 101 opposite to extrusion passage surface (i.e., with the die lip as shown in fig. 1) and are fixed by the lock nuts 106) and another end portion is coupled to the output shaft 109 of the actuator (fig. 1 shows the another end portion of the rod member 105 coupled to the bolt (output shaft) 109 by structures shown in fig. 1, including springs 108 which enable the rod member 105 and the bolt (output shaft) 109 to remain in contact during movement thereof; col. 7, line 20, to col. 8, line 38), wherein the actuator extrudes or retracts the output shaft 109 in order to linearly move the coupling member 105, and thereby adjust the lip gap (fig. 1; col. 7, line 1, to col. 8, line 58; the bolt (output shaft) 109 is firmly held not to rotate so that when the bolt (actuator body) 110 is rotated the bolt (output shaft) 109 moves linearly to move the coupling member 105 and thereby adjust the lip gap). However, Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) does not disclose a lip gap measuring step, a controlling step or a control unit, as recited by claims 15-17. Gross (US 6,475,414) discloses a method of adjusting a lip gap using a lip gap adjusting device (figs. 5-8) configured to adjust the lip gap between a movable lip (e.g., 31b) and a mating lip of an extrusion molding die (figs. 5-8), the lip gap adjusting device comprising a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms 7a, 7b disposed in a width direction of the extrusion molding die (col. 5, lines 9-19, "adjusting screws 7a"; fig. 5 is a sectional view) and configured to adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots (i.e., by the plural adjusting screws 7a) (fig. 8 shows a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms disposed in the width direction of the die), wherein the lip gap adjusting mechanisms each comprise an actuator including an adjusting screw 7a, 7b, wherein the adjusting screws 7a, 7b are rotated by servomotors 11a, 11b and a control unit 19, 20 OR by manual rotation to adjust the lip gap (col. 5, lines 17-19 and lines 31-33; col. 6, lines 36-38). As mentioned above, Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) discloses actuation of the actuator includes manual adjustment by rotating bolt 110. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to modify the rotating bolts 110 of Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) with servomotors and a control unit, as disclosed by Gross (US 6,475,414), because such modifications are known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration for rotating bolts/screws enabling automated control of the actuators. CN 102744819 (see English translation) discloses a method for adjusting a lip gap using a lip adjusting device (figs. 1 and 4-6; [0006]-[0051]) configured to adjust a lip gap between a movable lip (fig. 5; lip movable by lip gap adjusting devices 14, 14) and a mating lip (fig. 5, the other lip) of an extrusion molding die (fig. 1), the method and the lip gap adjusting device comprising: a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms 14, 14 (figs. 4-5) disposed in a width direction of the extrusion molding die (fig. 4) and configured to adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots (fig. 4), wherein the lip gap adjusting mechanisms each comprise an actuator 14, 14 (figs. 4-5; [0042]; wherein the lip gap adjusting device is configured to locally adjust the lip gap at each disposition spot based on the lip gap measured in each of a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die corresponding to the disposition spots ([0042]; as shown in fig. 4, there are a plurality of lip gap adjusting devices 14, 14 at the disposition spots in the width direction of the extrusion molding die which locally adjust the lip gap at each disposition spot based on the lip gap measured by a lip gap measuring device 12); wherein the method further comprises: a lip gap measuring step of measuring the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip of the extrusion molding die in each of the plurality of positions along a width direction of the extrusion molding die by a lip gap measuring device 12 (figs. 4-5; [0042]); and a controlling step of controlling the actuators of the plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms that are disposed in the width direction of the extrusion molding die and configured to locally adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots, so that the lip gap becomes uniform, based on the lip gap measured in each of the plurality of positions (figs. 1 and 4-6; [0012], [0016], [0024], [0028], [0042], [0050]-[0051]; at a plurality of positions along a width of a die 3, the lip gap is measured by lip gap measuring device 12, and actuators 14 of a plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms along the width of the die 3 (fig. 4) are controlled to locally adjust the lip gap (at each of the disposition spots shown in fig. 4) so that the lip gap becomes uniform based on the lip gap measurements; ([0024], "to that the membrane lip gap remains stable"; [0028], "ensure that the lip gap remains unchanged"; [0050] “so that the lip gap is stabilized at 0.16mm”); wherein when the lip gap measured in at least one of the plurality of positions is outside a predetermined range, a movement amount of an output shaft (the electromagnet 14 close to the movable lip) of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip becomes uniform, the movement amount of the output shaft being controlled by a control unit connected to the actuator (fig. 5; [0042]; when the electromagnets 14 are energized, the electromagnet 14 close to and connected to the moveable lip moves so that the lip gap is adjusted, which movement is controlled by a microprocessor and a control circuit connected to the actuator when the measured lip gap is too large or too small (i.e., outside a predetermined range) so that the lip gap becomes uniform thereby enabling production of an extruded film having uniform thickness [0012], [0016], [0024], [0028], [0042], [0050]-[0051]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the method with a lip gap measuring step and a controlling step, as recited by CN 102744819, because modifications are known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration for the method capable of controlling the lip gap to become uniform by feedback control thereby enabling production of an extruded film having uniform thickness. As to claims 16-17, Gross (US 6,475,414) further discloses the method for adjusting a lip gap 1e, comprising: a thickness measuring step of measuring thickness of a film 16 formed from a molten resin extruded from the lip gap 1e by a thickness measuring unit 23 (col. 1, lines 19-22, thermoplastic melts; fig. 8; col. 6, lines 11-16, at least one flexible wall (movable lip) 2e of a flow channel 1e) in a plurality of positions along a width direction of the extrusion molding die; fig. 8 shows the thickness measuring unit 23 extending along the width direction); and a controlling step of controlling actuators 22 of the plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms 14e that are disposed in the width direction of the extrusion molding die (fig. 8) and configured to locally adjust the lip gap 1e at respective disposition spots so that the thickness of the film becomes uniform, based on the thickness of the film measured in each of the plurality of positions (fig. 8; col. 6, lines 10-47, control unit 20 controls the actuators 22 and lip gap adjusting mechanisms 14e disposed in the width direction to correct variances (for example, to make the film uniform) based on the thickness measurements; col. 2, lines 2-7, the adjusters (actuators) can adjust uniformly over the entire width). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to further modify the method with a thickness measuring step and a controlling step, as recited by Gross JS 6,475,414), because such modifications are known in the art and would provide an alternative configuration for the method capable of controlling the lip gap so that the thickness of the film becomes uniform based on the thickness of the film measured in each of the plurality of positions by feedback control. Note that such combination would result in a controlling step of controlling the actuators of the plurality of lip gap adjusting mechanisms that are disposed in the width direction of the extrusion molding die and configured to locally adjust the lip gap at respective disposition spots so that the lip gap and the thickness of the film becomes uniform, based on lip gap measured in each of the plurality of positions and the thickness of the film measured in each of the plurality of positions. For example, as disclosed by CN 102744819 as mentioned above, the lip gap becomes uniform by actuator movement based on the measured lip gap by feedback control to extrude a film of uniform thickness; and as disclosed by Gross (US 6,475,414) as mentioned above, the actuators are used correct variances based on the film thickness measurements and the actuators can adjust uniformly over the entire width. In view of such teachings, if the measured film thickness is too small (variance), then the actuators would adjust uniformly over the entire width to make the lip gap larger until the film thickness becomes uniform at the larger desired film thickness by feedback control, and since the lip gap is adjusted larger over the entire width, the lip gap would also become uniform at the larger lip gap based on the measured lip gap by feedback control. In other words, if the film thickness is too small, the lip gap would become larger uniformly across the width and the film thickness would become larger until both are uniform enabling extrusion of a uniform thickness film at the larger desired film thickness by feedback control based on the measured lip gap and the measured film thickness. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed March 25, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that none of the applied references teaches or suggests the combination of features as recited by the amended claims. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. See prior art rejections above. Applicant argues that, firstly, contrary to the Examiner's assertions, there is nothing in CN'819 to teach or suggest that the lip gap measuring device 12 measures the lip gap at a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die. Instead, as clearly shown in Fig. 5 and as clearly described in cited paragraphs [0012], [0016], [0024], [0028], [0038], [0039], [0042], and [0050], in CN'819, the lip gap measuring device 12 is arranged at the membrane lip of the die head 3 and measures the distance (i.e., the lip gap 15) between the two stainless steel blocks 3-1 forming the die head 3, the steel blocks 3-1 being locked to each other by bolts 16. Since there is no teaching or suggestion in CN'819 of the measuring device 12 measuring the lip gap 15 at a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die, there is also no teaching or suggestion in CN'819 of adjusting the lip gap at each disposition spot based on the lip gap measured in each of a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. CN'819 discloses that the lip gap measuring device 12 measures the lip gap at a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die, particularly corresponding to each position where a set of electromagnets 14, 14 are placed. Fig. 4 shows a plurality of sets of electromagnets 14, 14 at a plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die. As shown in fig. 5, at each position a movable die lip is locally adjustable by the respective set of electromagnets 14, 14. The lip gap measuring device measures the lip gap at the plurality of positions along the width direction of the extrusion molding die in order to provide feedback control at each position (figs. 4-5; [0042]). The feedback control at each position ensures that the lip gap remains unchanged so that the uniformity of the film thickness remains stable [0028], which uniform film thickness control is across the width direction of the extrusion molding die. Applicant argues that, further, since the two steel blocks 3-1 are locked to each other by bolts 16, the lip gap 15 in CN'819 cannot be locally adjusted, as now recited in Claim 1. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. While the two steel blocks 3-1 are locked to each other by bolts 16, the lip gap 15 in CN'819 is locally adjusted as shown in fig. 4 by the plurality sets of electromagnets 14, 14 across the width of the extrusion die, each set 14, 14 providing local adjustment of the die lip [0042]. Applicant argues that, as further disclosed in CN'819, when the membrane lip gap 15 is determined to be too large or too small, the membrane lip gap adjusting device, formed of two electromagnets 14 with a gap therebetween, is energized to make the two electromagnets repulse or attract each other and thereby deform the membrane lip and decrease or increase the membrane lip gap 15. Thus, in CN'819, the adjusting of the lip gap is done by electromagnetic action between the two electromagnets 14. As such, CN'819 also fails to teach or suggest that when the lip gap measured in at least one of the plurality of positions is outside a predetermined range, a movement amount of the output shaft of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip becomes uniform, the movement amount of the output shaft being controlled by a control unit connected to the actuator, as now recited in Claim 1. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. In response to applicant's arguments against the references individually, one cannot show nonobviousness by attacking references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of references. See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) discloses the output shaft of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap is adjustable, as required by the instant claims. As mentioned above, CN'819 discloses that when the lip gap measured in at least one of the plurality of positions is outside a predetermined range, a movement amount of the output shaft (the electromagnet 14 close to the movable lip and connected thereto which moves the movable lip) of the actuator corresponding to the at least one position is adjusted so that the lip gap between the movable lip and the mating lip becomes uniform, the movement amount of the output shaft being controlled by a control unit connected to the actuator. Even if Applicant disagrees that an output shaft of an actuator can be defined by the electromagnet 14 close to the movable lip and connected thereto which moves the movable lip (which disagreement can lead to file history estoppel), CN'819 clearly discloses actuating the actuators (electromagnets) to adjust the lip gap. And output shafts of actuators for adjusting lip gaps, as required by the instant claims, are known in the art as disclosed by Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082), as mentioned above. Thus, there is a reasonable expectation of success of combining Hattori et al. (US 5,051,082) in view of Gross (US 6,475,414) and CN 102744819, as mentioned above, because they are all in the same art and they all teach adjusting lip gaps using actuators. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH S LEYSON whose telephone number is (571)272-5061. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sam Xiao Zhao can be reached at 5712705343. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.S.L/Examiner, Art Unit 1744 /XIAO S ZHAO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1744
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jun 27, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Oct 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 08, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679017
EXTRUSION NOZZLE WITH INSERT ELEMENT
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679016
EXTRUSION FACILITY WITH UNDERGROUND TRANSFER OF THE TOOL MODULE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12629877
INTERMITTENT EXTRUSION SYSTEM AND EXTRUSION DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12600073
Apparatus For Adjusting The Thickness of a Resin Film Exiting an Extrusion Lip of a Blown Film Extruder
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594707
PVC FLOORING PRODUCTION LINE
1y 12m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.3%)
3y 0m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month