Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/278,204

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR POSITIONING EQUIPMENT RELATIVE TO A DRILL HOLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 22, 2023
Examiner
REFAI, RAMSEY
Art Unit
3664
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Universal Field Robots Pty LTD
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
322 granted / 647 resolved
-2.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
667
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§103
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 647 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Responsive to the Preliminary Amendment filed August 22, 2023. Claims 1-13, 15-16, 18, and 25-28 are pending. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because of improper length and improper content. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Applicant is reminded of the proper content of an abstract of the disclosure. A patent abstract is a concise statement of the technical disclosure of the patent and should include that which is new in the art to which the invention pertains. The abstract should not refer to purported merits or speculative applications of the invention and should not compare the invention with the prior art. If the patent is of a basic nature, the entire technical disclosure may be new in the art, and the abstract should be directed to the entire disclosure. If the patent is in the nature of an improvement in an old apparatus, process, product, or composition, the abstract should include the technical disclosure of the improvement. The abstract should also mention by way of example any preferred modifications or alternatives. Where applicable, the abstract should include the following: (1) if a machine or apparatus, its organization and operation; (2) if an article, its method of making; (3) if a chemical compound, its identity and use; (4) if a mixture, its ingredients; (5) if a process, the steps. Extensive mechanical and design details of an apparatus should not be included in the abstract. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. See MPEP § 608.01(b) for guidelines for the preparation of patent abstracts. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-13, 15-16, 18, 25-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bloomfield et al (US 2021/0318463). As per claim 1, Bloomfield et al teach (Previously Presented) An automated vehicle comprising: a control unit configured to control movement of the automated vehicle to a location adjacent an estimated location of a drill hole (see at least paragraphs [0044-0046, 0054-0059]) ; a scanning portion including one or more scanning devices configured to scan an area of terrain in the vicinity of the estimated location of the drill hole in order to determine an actual location of the drill hole (see at least paragraphs [0009-0013]), and to generate a point cloud representing at least a portion of the interior of the drill hole, the point cloud generating information regarding the orientation and condition of the drill hole (see at least paragraphs [0077, 0097]); at least one arm associated with the scanning portion, the at least one arm configured to move the scanning portion between a home position and one or more scanning positions (see at least paragraphs [0009-0025]); and an end effector associated with the at least one arm, the end effector being configured to perform one or more operations; wherein, upon generating the point cloud, the at least one arm is configured, based on the point cloud, to position the end effector in substantial alignment with the drill hole so that the end effector can perform the one or more operations (see at least figs 1-3, paragraph [0006, 0017]). As per claim 2, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the automated vehicle comprises a boom and an attachment portion configured to removably attach the scanning portion to the at least one arm (see at least paragraph [0006]). As per claim 3, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the automated vehicle further comprises one or more conduits configured to provide a passageway for fluids and/or solids to flow into and/or out of the drill hole (see at least paragraphs [0065-0067]). As per claim 4, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the control unit includes, or is associated, with a GPS unit (see at least paragraphs [0047, 0048]). As per claim 5, Bloomfield et al teach wherein GPS co-ordinates of one or more drill holes are known, and the control unit controls movement of the automated vehicle to a location in the vicinity of the GPS co-ordinates of the one or more drill holes (see at least paragraphs [0046-0048, 0069, 0099]). As per claim 6, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the automated vehicle further comprises a vision system (see at least paragraphs [0052, 0097]). As per claim 7, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the vision system includes at least one camera configured to detect a terrain and/or identify a feature thereof (see at least paragraphs [0052, 0097]). As per claim 8, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the at least one camera is positioned on the scanning portion and/or the at least one arm (see at least figs 1-3) As per claim 9, Bloomfield et al teach wherein data from the vision system is used by the control unit to improve movement of the automated vehicle and/or the at least one arm (see at least paragraphs [0054]). As per claim 10, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the data from the vision system is used to improve accuracy of a position calculation of the automated vehicle and/or the at least one arm (see at least paragraphs [0054]). As per claim 11, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the data includes scanned terrain data, sensed object data and combinations thereof (see at least paragraphs [0049, 0055]). As per claim 12, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the automated vehicle is operated autonomously or semi- autonomously (see at least paragraphs [0047, 0049]). As per claim 13, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the estimated location of the drill hole is determined by the automated vehicle or is provided as GPS co-ordinates (see , at least paragraphs [0047-0048, 00690099]). As per claim 15, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the one or more scanning devices include stereo cameras, LIDAR laser scanners, radar devices and/or acoustic devices (see at least paragraphs [0052, 0097]). As per claim 16 Bloomfield et al teach wherein the point cloud is generated to a depth of up to 50 metres into the drill hole (non-functional descriptive language). As per claim 18, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the point cloud is used to determine a centreline of the drill hole (see at least paragraphs [0065]). As per claim 25, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the one or more operations performed by the end effector include placing one or more tools into the drill hole, remove or reduce obstructions or blockages in the drill hole, charge the drill hole with explosives and/or remove samples from the drill hole (see at least figs 1-3 and corresponding text). Claims 26-27 contain similar limitations as the claims above and therefore are rejected under similar rationale. As per claim 28, Bloomfield et al teach wherein the point cloud generates information regarding the orientation and condition of the drill hole (see at least paragraphs [0053-0055, 0142]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ramsey Refai whose telephone number is (313)446-4867. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kito Robinson can be reached at (571) 270-3921. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAMSEY REFAI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3664
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 24, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 05, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 05, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 11, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596384
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAPPING OBSTRUCTIONS IN A WORK AREA TO CORRESPONDING LOCATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591842
Node-enabled Logistics Receptacle Apparatus, Systems, and Methods with a Deployable Storage Element for Receiving and Temporarily Maintaining a Delivery Item
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582038
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE OPERATION OF AN AGRICULTURAL HARVESTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12559141
LOGISTICS SYSTEM COMPRISING A TRUCK AND A TRAILER AND RELATED METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12546902
Hybrid Position Navigation and Timing System
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (+9.3%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 647 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month