Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/278,253

PRINTED WIRING BOARD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 22, 2023
Examiner
SAWYER, STEVEN T
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
733 granted / 1017 resolved
+4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1059
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1017 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/14/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Magera et al. (US PG. Pub. 2008/0121420) in view of Yamaguchi et al. (US PG. Pub. 2006/0194031). Regarding claim 1 – Magera teaches a printed wiring board (figs. 1-3) comprising: a base (110 [paragraph 0025] Magera states, “insulating dielectric core 110”) having a first surface (top surface) and a second surface (bottom surface) positioned opposite to the first surface (see fig. 3), wherein a through hole (140 [paragraph 0023] Magera states, “aperture 140”) reaching the second surface (bottom surface) from the first surface (top surface) is formed in the base (110), wherein a first opening (upper opening) being an open end of the through hole (140) is formed in the first surface (top surface) of the base (110), wherein a second opening (lower opening) being an open end of the through hole (140) is formed in the second surface (bottom surface) of the base (110), the printed wiring board further comprising a conductor layer (350/340 [paragraph 0023] Magera states, “copper 340, 350 is also plated on the walls of the mechanically drilled aperture 140”) disposed at least inside the through hole (140), the conductor layer (350/340) extending from the first surface (top surface) to the second surface (bottom surface), wherein the base (110) includes a first protrusion (see protrusion that narrows the through hole 140 at the first surface) protruding from an edge portion of the first opening (see annotated figure 3 below), wherein the first opening (upper opening adjacent to the protrusion) has a first opening width in a first cross section passing through the first protrusion and a center of the first opening and taken along a thickness direction of the base (see annotated figure 3 below), wherein the second opening (opening at the second surface) has a second opening width in the first cross section, wherein the first opening width is smaller than the second opening width (claimed structure shown in annotated figure 3 below), wherein the first protrusion includes a first conductor layer (130 [paragraph 0025] Magera states, “metal foil 120, 130 such as copper”), and wherein the first conductor layer (130) extends to a region adjacent to, but not beyond, the first opening at the first surface (top surface) of the base (110; claimed structure shown in figure 3 and annotated figure 3 below). Magera fails to teach a first conductor layer including a material differing from a material of the conductor layer. Yamaguchi teaches a printed wiring board (fig. 7D [title] Yamaguchi states, “wiring substrate”) having a first conductor layer (25 [paragraph 0047 & 0030 & 0029] Yamaguchi states, “plating foundation layer 25…The first plating foundation layer 2 and the second plating foundation layer 9 formed using the insulating resin particles containing metal particulates become insulating resin layers containing metal particulates…the metal particulates to be contained in the insulating resin particles are preferably composed of Cu, Au, Ag, Pt, Pd, Ni or the like”) and a conductor layer (28 [paragraph 0051 & claim 6] Yamaguchi states, “metal plating layers 28…the metal plating layer is composed of Cu, Ag, Au, or an alloy containing these”) wherein the first conductor layer (25) including a material differing from a material of the conductor layer (28; each of these layers are made of different materials as discussed above). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the printed wiring board having a first conductor layer on the first protrusion but not extending beyond the first opening and a conductor layer extending from the first to second surface of the base within the through hole as taught by Magera with the first conductor layer includes a material different from a material of the conductor layer as taught by Yamaguchi because Yamaguchi states, “The metal particulates existing in the insulating resin layer serves as plating catalysts” [paragraph 0030]. This plating catalyst will allow faster processing, enhanced conductivity, superior corrosion resistance, thereby improving the reliability regarding the completed wirings/circuits. PNG media_image1.png 809 966 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5 - Magera in view of Yamaguchi teach the printed wiring board according to claim 3, wherein the material of the first conductive layer (Yamaguchi; fig. 7D, 25) include nickel or chromium ([paragraph 0047 & 0030 & 0029] Yamaguchi states, “plating foundation layer 25…The first plating foundation layer 2 and the second plating foundation layer 9 formed using the insulating resin particles containing metal particulates become insulating resin layers containing metal particulates…the metal particulates to be contained in the insulating resin particles are preferably composed of Cu, Au, Ag, Pt, Pd, Ni or the like”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10, 13 and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 and 5 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN T SAWYER whose telephone number is (571)270-5469. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30 am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at 5712722342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN T SAWYER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 27, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593400
WIRING SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580368
ANTI-ROTATION DEVICE FOR CABLE STRINGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573823
CABLE TRAY ASSEMBLY WITH SPLICE PLATE ASSEMBLY AND BONDING JUMPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563666
METAL SHEET MATERIAL, LAYERED BODY, INSULATED CIRCUIT BOARD, AND METAL SHEET MATERIAL MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557216
TYPE-3 PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS (PCBS) WITH HYBRID LAYER COUNTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1017 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month