Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/278,812

Narrow-band light system having a maximum color consistency across observers and test samples

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 24, 2023
Examiner
CARTER, WILLIAM JOSEPH
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Signify Holding B V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
611 granted / 991 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
64.0%
+24.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 991 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-15 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim1, 6, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023. With respect to claim 1, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches a light generating system configured to generate in an operational mode system light having a spectral power distribution with at least 85% of the spectral power in emission bands in four basic wavelength ranges of each at maximum 50 nm width (see claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023), of which at least three of the four basic wavelength ranges are selected from a first wavelength range of 445 nm +/- 25 nm, a second wavelength range of 518 nm +/- 25 nm, a third wavelength range of 579 nm +/- 25 nm, and a fourth wavelength range of 633 nm +/- 25 nm (see claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023), wherein the emission bands have full width half maxima of at maximum 25 nm, wherein at least one of the emission bands has a full width half maximum of at maximum 20 nm (see claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023), and wherein the system light is white system light having a correlated color temperature (CCT) between 2700 K and 6500 K and a color rendering index (CRI) of at least 80 (see claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 2, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches wherein four of the four basic wavelength ranges are selected from the four basic wavelength ranges as defined in claim 1; and wherein the emission bands have a full width half maximum of at maximum 20 nm (see claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 3, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 wherein the four basic wavelength ranges are selected from a first wavelength range of 445 nm +/- 15 nm, a second wavelength range of 518 nm +/- 15 nm, a third wavelength range of 579 nm +/- 15 nm, and a fourth wavelength range of 633 nm +/- 15 nm (see claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 4, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches wherein the four wavelength ranges are selected from a first wavelength range of 445 nm +/- 5 nm, a second wavelength range of 518 nm +/- 8 nm, a third wavelength range of 579 nm +/- 9 nm, and a fourth wavelength range of 633 nm +/- 13 nm (see claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 5, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches wherein the light generating system is configured to generate in the operational mode system light having a spectral power distribution with at least 95% of the spectral power in the emission bands (see claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023) As for claim 6, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches comprising four sources of light configured to generate the emission bands (see claim 6 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 7, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches wherein one or more of the four sources of light comprise laser light sources (see claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 8, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches wherein one or more of the four sources of light (110,120,130,140) comprise quantum structure based light sources (see claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 9, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches wherein one or more of the four sources of light comprise a light source selected from a LED, a phosphor converted LED, and a superluminescent diode, optionally in combination with first optics (210), wherein the first optics are configured to narrow the beam width of the respective source of light (see claim 9 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 10, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches wherein a first source of light is configured to generate the first emission band having a centroid wavelength selected from the wavelength range of 442-448 nm, wherein a second source of light is configured to generate the second emission band having a centroid wavelength selected from the wavelength range of 512-526 nm, wherein a third source of light is configured to generate the third emission band having a centroid wavelength selected from the wavelength range of 574-583 nm, wherein a fourth source of light is configured to generate the fourth emission band having a centroid wavelength selected from the wavelength range of 627-638 nm; and wherein the emission bands have full width half maxima of at minimum 5 nm (see claims 1, 6, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 11, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches further comprising second optics, configured to combine two or more beams of light of two or more of the four sources of light, and third optics configured downstream of the sources of light, wherein the third optics comprises a beam shaping element selected from the group of diffusors and collimators (see claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 12, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches further comprising a control system, wherein the control system is configured to control one or more of the spectral power distribution, the color rendering index, the color point, and the correlated color temperature of the system light (see claim 12 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 13, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches wherein the control system is configured to control one or more of the spectral power distribution, the color rendering index, and the color point, of the system light while maintaining the correlated color temperature within a range of 2700-6500 K (see claim 13 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 14, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches wherein the control system is configured to control one or more of the spectral power distribution, the color rendering index, the color point, and the correlated color temperature of the system light in dependence of a sensor signal of a sensor, wherein the sensor comprises an optical sensor (see claim 14 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). As for claim 15, U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023 teaches a light generating device selected from the group of a lamp, a luminaire, a projector device, comprising the light generating system according to claim 1 (see claim 15 of U.S. Patent No. 12,111,023). Allowable Subject Matter The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: With respect to claim 1, the closest prior art (Hikmet (9,599,293)) teaches a light converting system (quantum dots from column 9, lines 17-22) configured to convert in an operational mode system light (P1, P2, P3, and P4) in four basic wavelength ranges (Fig. 8) of each at maximum 50 nm width (column 6, lines 9-15), of which at least three of the four basic wavelength ranges are selected from a first wavelength range of 445 nm +/- 25 nm, a second wavelength range of 518 nm +/- 25 nm, a third wavelength range of 579 nm +/- 25 nm, and a fourth wavelength range of 633 nm +/- 25 nm (column 9, lines 17-22). As for claims 1-15, the prior art does not teach or suggest a light generating system configured to generate in an operational mode system light having a spectral power distribution with at least 85% of the spectral power in emission bands in four basic wavelength ranges of each at maximum 50 nm width, wherein the emission bands have full width half maxima of at maximum 25 nm, wherein at least one of the emission bands has a full width half maximum of at maximum 20 nm, and wherein the system light is white system light having a correlated color temperature (CCT) between 2700 K and 6500 K and a color rendering index (CRI) of at least 80; along with the other limiting elements of claim 1. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Hikmet (9,599,293) Yuan et al. (11,054,090) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM JOSEPH CARTER whose telephone number is (571)272-0959. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ABDULMAJEED AZIZ can be reached at 571-270-5046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM J CARTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875 2/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 24, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601459
Light Assembly for DRL and Turn Functions
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12580330
ELECTRICAL FEED CONNECTOR SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) CIRCUIT BOARDS WITH VARIED PLACEMENT OF WIRE TERMINAL CONNECTION POINTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578513
DIFFUSER TO IMPROVE UNIFORMITY OF HEAD-UP DISPLAY IMAGE BRIGHTNESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571519
WAVELENGTH CONVERSION MODULE, LIGHT EMISSION DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING WAVELENGTH CONVERSION MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571516
LED LIGHT-EMITTING STRUCTURE, LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, AND PREPARATION METHOD FOR LIGHT-EMITTING STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 991 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month