Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/278,823

USER EQUIPMENT APPARATUS, BASE STATION APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Aug 24, 2023
Examiner
LINDENBAUM, ALAN LOUIS
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allow Rate
204 granted / 421 resolved
-9.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
69 currently pending
Career history
490
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.7%
+16.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 421 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 6-8 recite the limitations “a PRACH configuration includes … a first list of preamble index ranges, a second list of preamble index ranges, and an indication of one or a coverage enhancement (CE) mode and a non-CE mode for transmission without repetition; and each of the first and second list is associated with one synchronization signal and physical broadcasting channel block (SSB) of a plurality of SSBs” and “in a case that at least one of the plurality of SSBs, that has a synchronization signal (SS)-RSRP above the first RSRP threshold is available, select the second list from the plurality of SSBs,” “in a case that no SSB, that has an SS-RSRP above a second RSRP threshold A, among the one or more second RSRP threshold, is available, select RSRP Level 2 and select the second list from any SSB.” It is unclear how a single “second list of preamble index ranges” can be “from the plurality of SSBs” and/or “from any SSB.” In Applicant’s Specification, if each SSB is associated with its own distinct set of lists of preamble indexes, then the claim language should reflect that scenario. On the other hand, if there is only a single set of lists of preamble indexes, and the that set of lists of preamble ranges is associated with a plurality of SSBs, then the list is not “from the plurality of SSBs” and/or “from any SSB.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 6-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park (US 2023/0007702) in view of Choi et al. (US 2022/0322454). Regarding claim 6, Park discloses a user equipment (UE) (Park, paragraph [0002], UE; paragraph [0009], UE receiving random access configuration information from a base station), comprising: reception circuitry configured to receive, from a base station, system information, including physical random access channel (PRACH) configuration information, for a serving cell (Park, paragraph [0009], UE receiving random access configuration information from a base station; paragraph [0092], random access configuration information provided to UEs via SIB1; paragraph [0140], UE receives random access configuration via system information), wherein: the PRACH configuration information includes a first reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold, one or more second RSRP thresholds (Park, Figs. 4, 5, 6, 10, 11 , 12; paragraph [0141], Table 5, numberOfRA-PreamblesGroupA; rsrp-ThresholdSSB; rsrpThresholdSSB-SUL; rsrp-ThresholdSSB-repetition; groupCconfigured; numberOfRA-PreamblesGroupB; offsetOfRAPrearnblesGroupC; numRepetitionPerPrearnble; sub-group-list; numberOfRAPrearnblesSubGroup; ssb-perRACHOccasionAndCB-PreamblesPerSSB-RCNR; paragraph [0150], UE selects a preamble corresponding to a repetitive transmission level and a transmission power offset value based measurement channel information and channel measurement threshold values set for each repetition level; paragraph [0152], UE determines repetition level based on RSRP value and predetermined threshold value; paragraph [0205], preamble index groups corresponding to a predetermined number of time of repetitive transmission based on SSB RSRP; paragraph [0259], within a preamble group corresponding to each SSB, a set of preamble indices corresponding to repetition level configured as a preamble sub-group), a first list of preamble index ranges, a second list of preamble index ranges (Park, Fig. 5, paragraph [0188], preamble groups A, B, C associated with a single SSB #k), and an indication of one of a coverage enhancement (CE) mode and a non-CE mode for transmission without repetition (Park, Fig. 5, paragraph [0149], number of times that a random access preamble is repeatedly transmitted and a parameter related to adjustment of transmission power may be used for the purpose of compensation associated with coverage for an RC UE; paragraph [0188], preamble groups A, B do not have repetition levels, preamble group C has sub-groups with repetition levels #1, #2, #3; Fig. 13, S1320 Type of UE, only the second type of UE proceeds to steps with a repetition level); and each of the first and second list is associated with one synchronization signal and physical broadcasting channel block (SSB) of a plurality of SSBs (Park, Figs. 5, 6, 10, 11, paragraph [0188], preamble groups A, B, C associated with a single SSB #k), the first list is associated with the non-CE mode (Park, Fig. 5, paragraph [0188], preamble groups A, B do not have repetition levels; Fig. 13, S1320 Type of UE, only the second type of UE proceeds to steps with a repetition level), and the second list is associated with the CE mode and an RSRP level (Park, Figs. 4, 5, 6, 10, 11 , 12; paragraph [0150], UE selects a preamble corresponding to a repetitive transmission level and a transmission power offset value based measurement channel information and channel measurement threshold values set for each repetition level; paragraph [0152], UE determines repetition level based on RSRP value and predetermined threshold value, if less than the threshold then preamble is transmitted I times, and if greater than threshold then preamble is transmitted j times; Park, Fig. 5, paragraph [0188], preamble group C has sub-groups with repetition levels #1, #2, #3; paragraph [0205], preamble index groups corresponding to a predetermined number of time of repetitive transmission based on SSB RSRP; paragraph [0259], within a preamble group corresponding to each SSB, a set of preamble indices corresponding to repetition level configured as a preamble sub-group; Fig. 13, S1320 Type of UE, only the second type of UE proceeds to steps with a repetition level); and control circuitry configured to; in a case that the indication indicates the non-CE mode, select the first list and select RSRP level 0 (Park, paragraph [0150], UE selects a preamble corresponding to a repetitive transmission level and a transmission power offset value based measurement channel information and channel measurement threshold values set for each repetition level; paragraph [0152], UE determines repetition level based on RSRP value and predetermined threshold value, if less than the threshold then preamble is transmitted I times, and if greater than threshold then preamble is transmitted j times; Park, Fig. 5, paragraph [0188], paragraph [0188], preamble groups A, B do not have repetition levels, preamble group C has sub-groups with repetition levels #1, #2, #3; paragraph [0205], preamble index groups corresponding to a predetermined number of time of repetitive transmission based on SSB RSRP; paragraph [0259], within a preamble group corresponding to each SSB, a set of preamble indices corresponding to repetition level configured as a preamble sub-group), in a case that the indication indicates the CE mode: in a case that at least one of the plurality of SSBs, that has a synchronization signal (SS)-RSRP above the first RSRP threshold is available, select the second list from the plurality of SSBs, that has the SS-RSRP above the first RSRP threshold, and select RSRP Level 0 (Park, paragraph [0096], rsrp-ThresholdSSB: an RSRP threshold value for selecting an SSB; paragraph [0122], UE selects an optimal SSB having a highest SSB-RSRP; paragraph [0150], UE selects a preamble corresponding to a repetitive transmission level and a transmission power offset value based measurement channel information and channel measurement threshold values set for each repetition level; paragraph [0152], UE determines repetition level based on RSRP value and a predetermined threshold value, if less than the threshold then preamble is transmitted I times, and if greater than threshold then preamble is transmitted j times; paragraph [0253], UE selects SSB#k based on an optimal SSB-RSRP, then UE determines a repetition level, then UE selects a preamble from the preamble group corresponding to the determined repetition level), in a case that no SSB, that has an SS-RSRP above a second RSRP threshold A, among the one or more second RSRP threshold, is available, select RSRP Level 2 and select the second list from any SSB (Park, paragraph [0096], rsrp-ThresholdSSB: an RSRP threshold value for selecting an SSB; paragraph [0122], UE selects an optimal SSB having a highest SSB-RSRP; paragraph [0150], UE selects a preamble corresponding to a repetitive transmission level and a transmission power offset value based measurement channel information and channel measurement threshold values set for each repetition level; paragraph [0152], UE determines repetition level based on RSRP value and a predetermined threshold value, if less than the threshold then preamble is transmitted I times, and if greater than threshold then preamble is transmitted j times; paragraph [0253], UE selects SSB#k based on an optimal SSB-RSRP, then UE determines a repetition level, then UE selects a preamble from the preamble group corresponding to the determined repetition level), and select RSRP Level 1 and select the second list from any SSB, that has an SS-RSRP above the second RSRP threshold A (Park, paragraph [0096], rsrp-ThresholdSSB: an RSRP threshold value for selecting an SSB; paragraph [0122], each UE selects an optimal SSB index having a highest SSB-RSRP appropriate for a corresponding channel environment; paragraph [0126], base station identifies RC UE based on preamble selection; paragraph [0150], UE selects a preamble corresponding to a repetitive transmission level and a transmission power offset value based measurement channel information and channel measurement threshold values set for each repetition level; paragraph [0152], UE determines the repetition level based on RSRP value and rsrp-ThresholdSSB-repetition, UE uses repetition level i if less than threshold value and repetition level j if greater than threshold value; paragraph [0253], UE selects SSB#k based on an optimal SSB-RSRP, then UE determines a repetition level, then UE selects a preamble from the preamble group corresponding to the determined repetition level) in a case that: the at least one of the plurality of one or more SSBs, that has the SS-RSRP above the first RSRP threshold is not available, and at least one of the plurality of one or more SSBs, that has the SS-RSRP above the second RSRP threshold A, among the one or more second RSRP thresholds, is available (Park, paragraph [0096], rsrp-ThresholdSSB: an RSRP threshold value for selecting an SSB; paragraph [0122], each UE selects an optimal SSB index having a highest SSB-RSRP appropriate for a corresponding channel environment; paragraph [0126], base station identifies RC UE based on preamble selection; paragraph [0150], UE selects a preamble corresponding to a repetitive transmission level and a transmission power offset value based measurement channel information and channel measurement threshold values set for each repetition level; paragraph [0152], UE determines the repetition level based on RSRP value and rsrp-ThresholdSSB-repetition, UE uses repetition level i if less than threshold value and repetition level j if greater than threshold value; paragraph [0253], UE selects SSB#k based on an optimal SSB-RSRP, then UE determines a repetition level, then UE selects a preamble from the preamble group corresponding to the determined repetition level), and select a preamble from the selected one of the first list and the second list (Park, paragraph [0126], base station identifies RC UE based on preamble selection; paragraph [0150], UE selects a preamble corresponding to a repetitive transmission level and a transmission power offset value based measurement channel information and channel measurement threshold values set for each repetition level; paragraph [0152], UE determines the repetition level based on RSRP value and rsrp-ThresholdSSB-repetition, UE uses repetition level i if less than threshold value and repetition level j if greater than threshold value; paragraph [0253], UE selects SSB#k based on an optimal SSB-RSRP, then UE determines a repetition level, then UE selects a preamble from the preamble group corresponding to the determined repetition level). Although Park discloses all of the claim limitations, in order to advance prosecution, the Examiner includes the Choi references, which more clearly discloses that multiple repetition levels {Coverage Enhancement levels] correspond to multiple threshold RSRP intervals. Choi disclose in a case that at least one of the plurality of SSBs, that has a synchronization signal (SS)-RSRP above the first RSRP threshold is available, select the second list from the plurality of SSBs, that has the SS-RSRP above the first RSRP threshold, and select RSRP Level 0 (Choi, paragraph [0092], UE measures RSRP and compares to preconfigured RSRP threshold, if the RSRP exceeds threshold 1, the UE transmits a preamble on a resource allocated to a CE level 0; paragraph [0102], UE may compare a plurality of measured SS-RSRP with one threshold configured to determine SSBs that may select as a basis of preamble transmission; paragraph [0128], if there is one or more SS-RSRP exceeding the threshold); in a case that no SSB, that has an SS-RSRP above a second RSRP threshold A, among the one or more second RSRP threshold, is available, select RSRP Level 2 and select the second list from any SSB (Choi, paragraph [0092], if measured RSRP is smaller than threshold 1 and greater than threshold 2, UE transmits a preamble with CE level 1, UE determines to transmits preamble a CE levels 2, 3, 4 in the same manner, CE increases by increasing the number of preamble repetitions; paragraph [0129], if there is no SS-RSRP exceed the threshold, the UE may compare several thresholds based on measured SS-RSRP to determine CE level, paragraph [0132], if RSRP is smaller than the RSRP threshold 1 and greater than threshold 2, determine CE level 1, if RSRP is small than threshold 2, determine CE level 2), and select RSRP Level 1 and select the second list from any SSB, that has an SS-RSRP above the second RSRP threshold A in a case that: the at least one of the plurality of one or more SSBs, that has the SS-RSRP above the first RSRP threshold is not available, and at least one of the plurality of one or more SSBs, that has the SS-RSRP above the second RSRP threshold A, among the one or more second RSRP thresholds, is available (Choi, paragraph [0092], if measured RSRP is smaller than threshold 1 and greater than threshold 2, UE transmits a preamble with CE level 1, UE determines to transmits preamble a CE levels 2, 3, 4 in the same manner, CE increases by increasing the number of preamble repetitions; paragraph [0129], if there is no SS-RSRP exceed the threshold, the UE may compare several thresholds based on measured SS-RSRP to determine CE level, paragraph [0132], if RSRP is smaller than the RSRP threshold 1 and greater than threshold 2, determine CE level 1, if RSRP is small than threshold 2, determine CE level 2). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, for the repetition levels of Park to correspond to threshold RSRP intervals. The motivation to combine the references would have been to increase reliability by using increase numbers of repetitions to compensate for lower reception quality. Claims 7 and 8 are rejected under substantially the same rationale as claim 6. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed January 15, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant asserts that Park and Choi do not disclose the amended claim limitations, but Applicant does not provide any reasoning or analysis to explain or support that assertion. However Applicant is incorrect. As discussed in the claim rejections above, Park in view of Choi discloses all of the claim limitations. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALAN LOUIS LINDENBAUM whose telephone number is (571)270-3858. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nishant Divecha can be reached at (571) 270-3125. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALAN L LINDENBAUM/ Examiner, Art Unit 2466 /Nishant Divecha/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2419
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 24, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Jan 15, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603845
Device-Assisted Services for Protecting Network Capacity
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12557092
Data Scheduling in High Frequency
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12526661
Radio Link Monitoring for Sidelink Communications
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12483974
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCED CAPABILITY TERMINAL TO ACCESS A CELL IN MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12396051
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FAILURE RECOVERY IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 19, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+15.8%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 421 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month