Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/279,208

FOLDABLE STORAGE BOX

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Aug 29, 2023
Examiner
VOLZ, ELIZABETH J
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Zhejiang Roushome Products Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
722 granted / 1082 resolved
-3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
1140
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1082 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 5-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sheng-Bin (U.S. Pub. No. 20050029260). Regarding Claim 1, Sheng-Bin discloses a foldable storage box (Figure 1), comprising four hard side surfaces in a vertical direction (Figure 1), a soft bottom surface (Figure 1), and a hard support plate that matches the bottom surface 50 (Figure 1) and is disposed on the bottom surface (Figure 3), wherein each side surface has a non-woven fabric interlayer (figure 1), and a hard plug board is inserted in the interlayer (Figure 2); at least one pair of the four side surfaces are capable of being folded along a vertical folding axis (Figure 4); vertical flexible dividing lines are disposed at intersections of the four side surfaces and the vertical folding axis (figure 4), and the flexible dividing lines confine and isolate the respective hard plug boards in a horizontal direction (Figure 2 and 4); and the flexible dividing lines are formed by welding two layers of non-woven fabrics in an ultrasonic welding manner (product by process; figure 1); the side surfaces and the bottom surface are connected in a sewing manner (Figure 1; product by process); and further, a circle of decorative strips is wrapped around outer sides of overlapping positions of the side surfaces and the bottom surface (Figure 1), and the decorative strips not only hide the edges of the overlapping positions of the side surfaces and the bottom surface but also strengthen moldings (figure 1); and an opening portion enclosed by the side surfaces is covered with another circle of the decorative strips (figure 1), the decorative strips hide an edge of the opening portion formed by the side surfaces (figure 1). Regarding Claim 5, Sheng-Bin discloses a width of each of the two side surfaces having the vertical folding axis is smaller than or equal to a width of each of the other two side surfaces (figure 4). Regarding Claim 6, Sheng-Bin discloses the bottom surface is a square (Figure 3), and the vertical folding axis is arranged on a symmetry axis of the side surfaces (figure 4). Regarding Claim 7, Sheng-Bin discloses a lifting ring 56 (Figure 3) is disposed on an upper side of the hard support plate to lift the hard support plate out of the storage box (Figure 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sheng-Bin (U.S. Pub. No. 20050029260) in view of Ma (U.S. Pub. No. 20110240636). Regarding Claim 4, Sheng-Bin teaches all the limitations substantially as claimed except for a circular hole is formed on one of the side surfaces, and an edge of the hole is reinforced by a metal or plastic part. However, Ma teaches a circular hole is formed on one of the side surfaces (Figure 1), and an edge of the hole is reinforced by a metal or plastic part (figure 1). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Sheng-Bin to include the above, as taught by Ma, in order to provide a reinforced opening and the change to a circular hole is a matter of choice and would not change the function. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sheng-Bin (U.S. Pub. No. 20050029260) in view of Chen (U.S. Pub. No. 20050155891). Regarding Claim 8, Sheng-Bin teaches all the limitations substantially as claimed except for an opening portion of the storage box is provided with a box cover. However, Chen teaches an opening portion of the storage box is provided with a box cover 27 (figure 1). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Sheng-Bin to include the above, as taught by Chen, in order to protect the contents of the box. Applicant is duly reminded that a complete response must satisfy the requirements of 37 C.F. R. 1.111, including: “The reply must present arguments pointing out the specific distinctions believed to render the claims, including any newly presented claims, patentable over any applied references. A general allegation that the claims “define a patentable invention” without specifically pointing out how the language of the claims patentably distinguishes them from the references does not comply with the requirements of this section. Moreover, “The prompt development of a clear Issue requires that the replies of the applicant meet the objections to and rejections of the claims.” Applicant should also specifically point out the support for any amendments made to the disclosure. See MPEP 2163.06 II(A), MPEP 2163.06 and MPEP 714.02. The ''disclosure'' includes the claims, the specification and the drawings. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 9/11/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Sheng-Bin does not disclose decorative strips wrapped around outer sides of overlapping position of the side surfaces and bottom surface. However, Sheng-Bin discloses the strips around the outer edges at 29 (figure 1) which is used to cover and protect the edges. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELIZABETH J VOLZ whose telephone number is (571)270-5430. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11am-7pm est. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NATHAN JENNESS can be reached at (571)270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /E.J.V/Examiner, Art Unit 3733 /DON M ANDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 11, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600528
PACKAGE AND CLOSURE FOR PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595885
NONUNIFORM WALL THICKNESS PROFILE FOR TEARDROP PRESSURE VESSELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577039
WASTE MANAGEMENT RECEPTACLE SYSTEM FOR CONTAINMENT OF ODOROUS WASTE AND METHOD OF USING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559304
SECURE BIN FOR SELECTIVE DEPOSIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12559307
TRASH CAN ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+18.5%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1082 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month