Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/280,524

PLANT CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR RENEWING CONTROL IO MODULE IN PLANT CONTROL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 06, 2023
Priority
Mar 12, 2021 — JP 2021-040478 +1 more
Examiner
CHAMBERS, TRAVIS SLOAN
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1008 granted / 1168 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1184
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
63.5%
+23.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1168 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 5, 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP 2007241633 A (herein JP633). In reference to claim 1, JP633 teaches a plant control device (shown in figure 4), comprising: a terminal base (110; fig. 4) where a wiring (18; fig. 4) is connected which is connected to each of multiple devices installed in a plant; a control IO module (34, 35) where an IO signal is input or the IO signal is output; and a terminal base adapter (1) disposed between the control IO module (34, 35) and the terminal base (110), the terminal base adapter being configured to convert, by a predetermined logic, an IO signal input from at least one of the multiple devices or the IO signal input from the control IO module, wherein the terminal base adapter (1) is mountable on the terminal base (110) and includes a second electrical connector (16) which is mounted (through the connector cable that connects 16, 17) with a first electrical connector (17) disposed on the control IO module (34, 35). In reference to claim 2, JP633 teaches wherein the terminal base adapter (1) is paired with the control IO module. In reference to claim 5, JP633 teaches the terminal base adapter further includes a signal terminal (i.e. the terminal contact within connector 16) for enabling input/output of a redundant signal. Regarding the limitation for enabling input/output of a redundant signal, it has been held that a recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus satisfying the claimed structural limitations. In reference to claim 6, JP633 teaches the terminal base adapter further includes a communication terminal (i.e. the terminal contact within connector 16) for enabling mounting of a communication connection component. Regarding the limitation for enabling mounting of a communication connection component, it has been held that a recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus satisfying the claimed structural limitations. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 4, 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: (Claim 8) a step of mounting, on the terminal base, a terminal base adapter in place of the existing control IO module; and a step of mounting a new control IO module on the terminal base adapter. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRAVIS SLOAN CHAMBERS whose telephone number is (571)272-6813. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30a.m.-5:00p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah A Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRAVIS S CHAMBERS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831 02/25/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640525
CONNECTOR AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633688
CONNECTOR-LESS M.2 MODULE
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633682
CABLE TERMINATION AND METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633685
MULTI-POLE ELECTRICAL WIRING DEVICES WITH WIRE TERMINATION ASSEMBLIES
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627087
BOARD-LEVEL ARCHITECTURE AND COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+11.5%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1168 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month