Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/280,595

SHIELDED CONNECTOR ATTACHED TO SHIELDING CASE, HAVING TERMINAL PROVIDED WITH TERMINAL AND CONDUCTOR CONNECTION PORTIONS CONNECTED TO MATING TERMINAL OF MATING CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 06, 2023
Examiner
RIYAMI, ABDULLAH A
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
229 granted / 279 resolved
+14.1% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
293
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 279 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-5 are pending. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: SHIELDED CONNECTOR ATTACHED TO SHIELDING CASE, HAVING TERMINAL PROVIDED WITH TERMINAL AND CONDUCTOR CONNECTION PORTIONS CONNECTED TO MATING TERMINAL OF MATING CONNECTOR. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Itsuki et al. (JP 2014-38793, also published as US 2014/0051286) embodiment 2 (FIG. 5-12) in view of embodiment 1 (FIG. 1-4). With respect to Claim 1: Itsuki discloses a connector (FIG. 5, 210 2nd embodiment), comprising: a housing (FIG. 5/6, 220) made of synthetic resin ([0039]), the housing (220) having a facing surface (FIG. 9. 21, see notation) facing a mounting object; a connection terminal (FIG. 9; 51, 52) accommodated in the housing (220), a current-carrying conductor (FIG. 8/9, 231) connected to an end of a cable (FIG. 9, 230, 70), the current-carrying conductor (231) being accommodated in the housing (220); and a shield shell (FIG. 7, 240) made of metal for covering the housing (220) ([0056]), the shield shell (240) including an extending portion (FIG. 9, see notation) for covering the facing surface of the housing (220), [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (fixing portion)][AltContent: textbox (common resin wall)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (1st accommodating recess part)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (2nd accommodating recess part)][AltContent: textbox (extending portion)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (facing surface)] PNG media_image1.png 612 700 media_image1.png Greyscale the housing (220) including a first accommodation recess (FIG. 9, see notation) and a second accommodation recess (FIG. 9, see notation) (FIG. 9, 26) for accommodating a second fastening member (FIG. 9, 25) made of metal for fastening the housing (220) and the extending portion (FIG. 9, see notation) of the shield shell (FIG. 9, 240), and the first accommodation recess (FIG. 9, see notation) and the second accommodation recess (FIG. 9, see notation) being adjacent across a common resin wall (FIG. 9, see notation). Itsuki (FIG. 5, 210 embodiment 2) does not expressly disclose a first accommodation recess for accommodating a first fastening member made of metal for fastening the connection terminal and the current-carrying conductor. However, Itsuki (FIG. 3, 10 connector embodiment 1) teaches a first accommodation recess for accommodating a first fastening member (FIG. 3, 140) made of metal for fastening the connection terminal (FIG. 3, 53) and the current-carrying conductor (FIG. 3) ([0045, 0054], claims 4-7). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Itsuki (FIG. 5, 210 embodiment 2) with the teachings of Itsuki (FIG. 3, 10 embodiment 1) and provide a first accommodation recess for accommodating a first fastening member made of metal for fastening the connection terminal and the current-carrying conductor so as to miniaturize a connector while absorbing vibration from a body side.’ (paragraph [0006]). With respect to Claim 3: Itsuki discloses the connector (FIG. 9, 210), wherein the resin wall (FIG. 9, see notation) separating the first accommodation recess (FIG. 9, see notation) and the second accommodation recess (FIG. 9, see notation) has a wall thickness of 2 mm or less. With respect to Claim 4: Itsuki discloses the connector (FIG. 9, 210), wherein the shield shell (FIG. 9, 240) includes a fixing portion (FIG. 9, see notation) for the mounting object made of metal. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Reasons for Allowance The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter. Regarding Claim 2, allowability resides, at least in part, with the prior art, taken alone or in combination not showing or fairly teaching or suggesting the second accommodation recess is open in the facing surface of the housing, the first accommodation recess is open on a side opposite to the facing surface of the housing, and the first accommodation recess and the second accommodation recess at least partially overlap in projection in a direction intersecting a facing direction of the facing surface and the mounting object, as recited in claim 2, in conjunction with all the remaining limitations of the base claims. The prior art of record fails to teach or fairly suggest these limitations as substantially described in claim 2, these limitations, in combination with remaining limitations of claim 2, are neither taught nor suggested by the prior art of record, before claim 2 is allowable. Regarding Claim 5, allowability resides, at least in part, with the prior art, taken alone or in combination not showing or fairly teaching or suggesting the cable is constituted by the shielded cable including a shield member, and the shield member is connected to the extending portion of the shield shell, as recited in claim 5, in conjunction with all the remaining limitations of the base claims. The prior art of record fails to teach or fairly suggest these limitations as substantially described in claim 5, these limitations, in combination with remaining limitations of claim 5, are neither taught nor suggested by the prior art of record, before claim 5 is allowable. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER G. LEIGH whose telephone number is (571)270-0672. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:30AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ABDULLAH A. RIYAMI can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. August 23, 2025 /PETER G LEIGH/Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586960
TERMINAL UNIT, AND CONNECTOR INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573777
RELIABLE, ROBUST CARD EDGE CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568495
SHORT SIGNALING TRANSMISSION FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION IN UNLICENSED SPECTRUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12531373
UNLOCKING ELEMENT AND ELECTRICAL PLUG-IN PROVIDED THEREWITH
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12476392
CONDUCTOR HAVING AN INNER CONDUCTOR ENGAGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.5%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 279 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month