Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 28, 2026
Application No. 18/280,769

Seat Skin Material and Seat Including Same

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 07, 2023
Priority
Mar 24, 2021 — JP 2021-049801 +1 more
Examiner
DUNN, DAVID R
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
26%
Grant Probability
At Risk
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
55%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 26% of cases
26%
Career Allowance Rate
61 granted / 233 resolved
-25.8% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
244
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
80.7%
+40.7% vs TC avg
§102
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 233 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is indefinite as it recites the stitch density of the front layer as “11,000 to 21,000”, however no units have been provided. The specification in various locations, such as paragraph 11, similarly describes the density without any units. The specification (see ¶0017) defines “stitch density M” with a formula: M = N × √D where N is the number of stitches in the front layer knitted fabric per 2.54 cm² (6.45 cm²), and D is the total fineness (decitex) of the multifilament yarn forming one stitch. Thus, the claimed “stitch density” is a dimensioned value calculated by multiplying a count per area by the square root of a mass-per-length value (decitex), resulting in a derived unit (stitches per 2.54 cm² × √(decitex)). The specification uses the variable “M” for this, but the claim does not specify units or the formula. As such, in the claim, the absence of units or a formula in the claim itself renders the scope ambiguous, as “stitch density” could refer to several different industry measures (stitches per inch, per cm, per area, etc.), and the numerical range (11,000–21,000) does not correspond to a standard measure. As written, claim 11 is not fully clear on its own regarding the meaning and units of “stitch density.” Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID R DUNN whose telephone number is (571)272-6670. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Namrata Boveja can be reached at 571-272-8105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID R DUNN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 31, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 01, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636986
AIR DEFLECTOR
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12626616
COLOR-CODED CABLE AND ETHERNET PORT IDENTIFICATION LABELS
1y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12611972
CHILD SEAT HAVING A SEAT BELT GUIDE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599254
IMAGE DISPLAY
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590728
MODULAR FLOOR CASSETTE
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
26%
Grant Probability
55%
With Interview (+29.2%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 233 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month