Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/281,261

SENSOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 08, 2023
Examiner
WOLDEMARYAM, ASSRES H
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Pioneer Smart Sensing Innovations Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
577 granted / 696 resolved
+30.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
737
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 696 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. DETAILED ACTION This office action is in regards to application # 18/281,261 that was filed on 09/08/2023. Claims 1-3 are currently pending and are under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by YUTAKA et al. ( JP2010044050 ) (submitted on the IDS dated 09/08/2023) . Regarding Claim 1 . YUTAKA discloses a sensor device ( Fig. 1, para. [0018], “laser radar 1” ) comprising: a scanning unit ( Fig. 1, block 3, block 18, “scanning range by the scanning unit 3 ) ; and a plurality of reflecting units configured to reflect at least a part of a beam emitted to a scanning range of the scanning unit ( Fig. 1, block 7, para. [0018], “a laser beam reflector….7” ) , wherein the plurality of reflecting units are located at least four corners of the scanning range ( figure 1, the blocks marked as "7" are clearly located at four corners of the scanning range, see also paragraph 18, last sentence "laser beam reflector... disposed at four corners of a rectangular monitoring region E are provided "). Regarding Claim 3 . YUTAKA discloses a sensor device ( Fig. 1, para. [0018], “laser radar 1” ) further comprising: a measuring unit configured to measure positional deviation of the scanning unit from a reference position using a relationship between reflection amounts of a plurality of the beams reflected by the plurality of reflecting units ( para. [0017]-[0026]) . Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)(a)(2) as being anticipated by Humphrey (US2015/0265853) . Regarding Claim 2, Humphrey discloses a sensor device ( figure 1, paragraph 50 "apparatus 1 for determining the position of an object 3", seen in combination with figure 3, and paragraph 64, "preferred implementation ... in FIG. 3, ..reflectors...within the scan path 13... not connected to the object ...at known position(s) relative to the light source 5/MEM mirror 8 ") comprising: a scanning unit ( figure 1, block 8, read together with figure 3, block 8, paragraphs 53 "processing system 7 ... configured to move the MEM mirror 8 back and forth....thereby defining a scan pattern... indicated in FIG. 1 by the dash line 13... extremities in the scan path 13", it is noted that the difference between figures 1 and 3 lies in the position of the reflectors, 23 and 25 in figure 3 );and ; a plurality of reflecting units configured to reflect at least a part of a beam emitted to a scanning range of the scanning unit ( figure 3, blocks 23, 25, paragraph 64 "reference reflectors 23, 25, positioned within the scan path 13.... at known positions(s) relativ e to the light source "), wherein the plurality of reflecting units are located on at least both sides of the scanning range ( figure 3, blocks 23, 25, they are clearly located at both sides of the scanning range ),and , the plurality of reflecting units are configured to reflect at least a part of the beam different from the beam emitted to a scanning start position of the scanning range of the scanning unit and from the beam emitted to a scanning end position of the scanning range of the scanning unit ( para. [0064], [0065]) . Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure : JP2002107452 (submitted on the IDS dated 09/08/2023) discloses a sensor device (two-dimensional-scanning-type optical radar sensor) comprising: a scanning unit (scanning mirror 13); and a plurality of reflecting units (reflecting members ml to m4 for inspection) that each reflect at least part of a beam emitted to a scanning area of the scanning unit, the plurality of reflecting units being positioned at least in the four corners of the scanning area (fig. 1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FILLIN "Examiner name" \* MERGEFORMAT ASSRES H WOLDEMARYAM whose telephone number is FILLIN "Phone number" \* MERGEFORMAT (571)272-6607 . The examiner can normally be reached FILLIN "Work Schedule?" \* MERGEFORMAT Monday-Friday 8AM-5PM . Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, FILLIN "SPE Name?" \* MERGEFORMAT Joshua Huson can be reached at FILLIN "SPE Phone?" \* MERGEFORMAT 571-270-5301 . The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. FILLIN "Examiner Stamp" \* MERGEFORMAT Assres H. Woldemaryam Primary Examiner (Aeronautics and Astronautics) Art Unit 3642 /ASSRES H WOLDEMARYAM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 08, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601154
TRENCH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596183
SENSING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595051
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RETRACTING LIFT PROPELLER IN EVTOL AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593128
VIBRATION DAMPING GIMBAL SLEEVE FOR AN AERIAL VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589893
DEBRIS REMOVAL SATELLITE, DEBRIS REMOVAL CONTROL APPARATUS, DEBRIS REMOVAL CONTROL METHOD, AND GROUND FACILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 696 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month