Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/281,364

NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 11, 2023
Priority
Mar 17, 2021 — JP 2021-043142 +1 more
Examiner
DOVE, TRACY MAE
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
499 granted / 724 resolved
+3.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
765
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 724 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the communication filed on 6/25/26. Applicant’s arguments have been considered but are not found persuasive. Claims 1-6 are pending and remain rejected in view of the prior art. This Action is FINAL. Claims Analysis Claim 1 recites a battery comprising an electrode having a core and a mixture layer formed over the core. The mixture layer includes a first layer, a second layer and a third layer wherein each of the first layer, the second layer and the third layer includes a binder. A content of binder in the second layer is lower than or equal to a content of the binder in the first layer. Therefore, claim 1 encompasses an embodiment wherein the first layer and the second layer of the mixture layer are not structurally distinguished from each other (content of binder is equal). Furthermore, “over” the core is broader than “directly on” the core”. Specifically, “over’ is interpreted as “above”. For example, a plane flies “over” (above) my house is not the same as a plane flies “on” my house. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Moriyama et al., JP 2012-028006 A. Moriyama teaches an electrode plate for a nonaqueous electrolyte secondary battery having an electrode mixture layer (mixture layer) containing a binder and an electrode active material on a current collector (core). The electrode mixture layer is divided into an inner region (first layer/second layer) and an end region (third layer), and the weight ratio of the binder based on the active material is larger in the end region (third layer) than in the inner region (first layer/second layer) [0014]. The inner region may contain the binder in an amount of 1 part by weight [0049] and the end region may contain the binder in an amount of 2 parts by weight [0050]. See the Figures of Moriyama wherein the end region 3 is formed along a longitudinal direction of the electrode, at respective end portions in a width direction. PNG media_image1.png 246 327 media_image1.png Greyscale The boundary region between the inner region and the end region is 0.5 mm or more and 10 mm or less from the end of the electrode plate [0015]. In the end region 3, the width A is 0.5 mm to 10 mm [0022]. Thus, the claims are anticipated. Examiner notes the claims have been given the broadest reasonable interpretation. Given the broadest reasonable interpretation of the present claims, when Figure 1 is rotated 90°, one end layer 3 may be considered the “core”, layer 2 may be considered “a first layer and a second layer” and another end layer 3 may be considered “a third layer”. * Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Watanabe et al., US 2015/0380739 A1. Watanabe teaches a negative electrode for a nonaqueous electrolyte secondary battery comprising a belt-shaped negative electrode collector 32 (core) and a negative electrode mixture layer 50 (mixture layer) disposed on the negative electrode collector [0020]. See Figure 2, 3A and 3B of Watanabe. PNG media_image2.png 278 378 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 403 317 media_image3.png Greyscale In the negative electrode mixture layer 50, the content of the binding materials in the mixture is preferably the highest in the vicinity (for example, 30% or less of the thickness of the negative electrode mixture layer from the interface) of the interface with the negative electrode collector 32. In such a structure, the binding materials are concentrated near the interface between the negative electrode mixture layer 50 and the negative electrode collector 32 to enhance the binding property and inhibit peeling. More specifically, when the negative electrode mixture layer (a) 52 is divided into two equal parts at the center in the thickness direction, the negative electrode mixture layer (c) 56 is one half on the negative electrode collector side of the negative electrode mixture layer (a) 52, and the negative electrode mixture layer (d) 58 is the other half on the negative electrode mixture layer (b) 54 side of the negative electrode mixture layer (a) 52, where the content C (% by mass) of the binding materials relative to the mass of the negative active material in the negative electrode mixture layer (c) 56 and the content D (% by mass) of the binding materials relative to the mass of the negative active material in the negative electrode mixture layer (d) 58 preferably satisfy a relationship: C>D>B. The ratio C/D is preferably higher than 1.0 and 50 or less and more preferably 2 or more and 20 or less [0025]. The total amount of the first binding material 61 and the second binding material 62 in the negative electrode mixture layer 50 is preferably 0.45% by mass to 2.0% by mass based on the total amount of the mixture (solid content) of the negative electrode mixture layer 50. An amount of less than 0.45% by mass may deteriorate the current collecting properties due to insufficient binding strength. An amount of higher than 2.0% by mass may decrease the flexibility of the mixture layer and may inhibit the diffusion of lithium ions by the excess binding materials, which may cause deterioration of the characteristics [0030]. The content of the first binding material 61 is 0.4% to 1.9% by mass based on the total amount of the negative active material in the resulting negative electrode mixture layer 50 [0038]. The first negative electrode mixture layer formed in the first drying step preferably has a dried thickness of 0.5 to 5 μm [0039]. The content of the second binding material 62 is 0.02% to 1.5% by mass based on the total amount of the negative active material in the resulting negative electrode mixture layer 50 [0040]. The negative electrode mixture layer 50 has a thickness of, for example, 20 to 200 μm [0021]. The content A (% by mass) of the binding materials 60 relative to the mass of the negative active material in the negative electrode mixture layer (a) 52 and the content B (% by mass) of the binding materials 60 relative to the mass of the negative active material in the negative electrode mixture layer (b) 54 satisfy a relationship: 0.04≦B/(A+B)<0.5. The ratio B/(A+B) is preferably 0.06 or more and 0.3 or less [0023]. The content of binder 62 in layer 54 (third layer) is greater than a content of binder 62 in layer 58 (second layer) and/or a content of binder 62 in layer 56 (first layer). In addition, layer 52 may be considered both the first and second layer of the claimed invention. Thus, the claims are anticipated. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/25/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. All 35 USC 112 rejections of record are withdrawn. The claims have been amended accordingly. Examiner notes at least claim 1 does not require the content of binder in the second layer be different than the content of binder in the first layer. Regarding Moriyama, Examiner notes the claims have been given the broadest reasonable interpretation. Given the broadest reasonable interpretation of the present claims, when Figure 1 of Moriyama is rotated 90°, one end layer 3 may be considered the “core”, layer 2 may be considered “a first layer and a second layer” and another end layer 3 may be considered “a third layer”. Applicant’s arguments are not commensurate in scope with the claimed invention. Applicant points to at least Figure 3 of the present specification. However, at least claim 1 is broader than the embodiment shown in Figure 3. Examiner notes Moriyama does not appear to teach the embodiment shown in Figure 3 of the present specification. Regarding Watanabe, the reference clearly teaches the content of binder 62 in layer 54 (third layer) is greater than a content of binder 62 in layer 58 (second layer) and/or a content of binder 62 in layer 56 (first layer). In addition, layer 52 may be considered both the first and second layer of the claimed invention. The electrode has a current collector 32 (core). Furthermore, “over” the core is broader than “directly on” the core”. Specifically, “over’ is interpreted as “above”. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Mitsuhashi (CN102576875B) teaches an electrode plate comprises a current collector plate and an active substance layer formed on top of the current collector plate. The active substance layer contains a binder (135) comprising multiple binders (135e, 135f) having different glass transition points (abstract). THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRACY DOVE whose telephone number is (571)272-1285. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Buie-Hatcher can be reached at 571-270-3879. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRACY M DOVE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 25, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744255
SECONDARY BATTERY, ELECTRICAL APPARATUS, AND APPLICATION OF SILICATE MULTI-METAL SALT
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738504
ELECTRODE, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING SAME
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738478
ELECTRODE ACTIVE COMPOSITION, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, ELECTRODE, BATTERY, AND APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12706312
Negative Electrode And Secondary Battery Including The Negative Electrode
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698216
HIGH-PERFORMANCE LITHIUM-NICKEL-MANGANESE-COBALT OXIDE (LNMCO) CATHODE MATERIAL FOR POWER BATTERIES AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+9.6%)
3y 8m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 724 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month