Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/281,591

MONITORING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 12, 2023
Priority
Mar 22, 2021 — EU 21163989.3 +1 more
Examiner
JACOBS-BURTON, LASHONDA T
Art Unit
2457
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
912 granted / 999 resolved
+33.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -13% lift
Without
With
+-13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
§103
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment This Office Action is in response to Applicants Amendment filed on April 7, 2026. Claim 14 has been canceled. Claims 1-13 and 15-18 are pending and presented for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the word “and” should be removed the second limitation in the claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13 and 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the baby" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the monitor" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the remote units" in line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the baby monitor" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the corresponding remote user" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the monitor unit" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the monitor unit" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the monitor unit" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 12 recites the limitation "the baby monitor unit" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the monitor unit" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 16 recites the limitation "the monitor unit" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 17 recites the limitation "the monitor unit" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the monitor unit" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Note: Claims 1-13 and 15-18 would be considered allowable if the claim objection and 112 rejections are overcome. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LASHONDA T JACOBS-BURTON whose telephone number is (571)272-4004. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ario Etienne can be reached at 571-272-4001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LASHONDA JACOBS-BURTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2457 ljb June 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706888
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR UPLOADING DATA OF EXTERNAL ELECTRONIC DEVICE IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706896
DETECTION OF LOGGED-ON USERS BASED ON BROWSER STORAGE DATA
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706875
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR COMMUNICATION SESSION MANAGEMENT
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701166
CONNECTIVITY FRAMEWORK HAVING SESSION LAYER SECURITY FOR EMBEDDED SECURE CONNECTIVITY
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701150
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOTE CONTROL IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-13.1%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month