Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/281,906

METHOD FOR PREPARING CATALYST FOR PRODUCING CARBON NANOTUBES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 13, 2023
Examiner
COHEN, STEFANIE J
Art Unit
1732
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Chem, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
719 granted / 954 resolved
+10.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
979
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
58.1%
+18.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 954 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeon et al (KR20200012563, English translation) in view of Hwan et al (KR20210072986, English translation). ‘563, paragraph 32, teaches 1) preparing an active carrier by supporting a mixture comprising a main catalyst precursor and a promoter precursor on a support; 2) drying the active carrier through multistage drying; 3) preparing a supported catalyst by heat treating the dried active support. ‘563, paragraph 38, teaches in order to uniformly support the main catalyst precursor and the cocatalyst precursor on a support, the main catalyst precursor and the cocatalyst precursor are added to a solvent. ‘563, paragraph 104, teaches the supported active material is heat-treated to prepare a supported catalyst. ‘563, paragraph 105, teaches when the heat treatment is performed, a supported catalyst in which the main catalyst and the promoter are present in the state of being coated on the surface and the pores of the support is prepared. ‘563, paragraph 107, teaches the heat treatment may be carried out at 600 to 800 ℃. Heat treating at 600-800oC as taught by ‘563 reads on the step of sintering as claimed in claim 1 and 12. Although ‘563 teaches a mixing step, ‘563 does not teach the mixing step performed under a pressure of 1.5 bar to 4.5 bar. ‘986, abstract, teaches a catalyst including a porous support and a catalyst metal, introducing the catalyst, a solvent, and an ionomer into a chamber, and infiltrating the ionomer into the pores of the support. ‘986 teaches the pressure applied to the contents of the chamber may be 2 bar to 200 bar. ‘986, paragraph 18, teaches the catalyst metal is bonded to the outer surface of the support and the inner surface of the pores of the support. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to mix the components ‘563 with a pressure of 2 bar to 200 bar as taught by ‘986 to ensure the catalyst metal is bonded to the outer surface of the support and the inner surface of the pores of the support. Regarding claim 2, ‘986, paragraph 18, teaches the pressure applied to the contents of the chamber may be 2 bar to 200 bar. Regarding claim 3, ‘563, paragraph 46, teaches the main catalyst may be at least one selected from the group consisting of cobalt, iron, nickel, manganese and chromium, of which cobalt is preferable. Regarding claim 4, ‘563, paragraph 49, teaches the cocatalyst precursors are NH4VO3 , NaVO3 , V2O5, V(C5H7O2)3, (NH4) 6Mo7O24 , and (NH4) 6 Mo7O24·4H. Regarding claim 5, ‘563, paragraph 51, teaches the mixture may include the main catalyst precursor and the cocatalyst precursor such that the molar ratio of the main catalyst and the cocatalyst is 40:1 to 3:1. Regarding claim 6, ‘563, paragraph 42, teaches the support may include at least one selected from the group consisting of α-Al2O3 , γ-Al2O3, and AlO(OH) as an element that may affect the shape of the carbon nanotubes. Regarding claim 7, ‘563, paragraph 164, teaches a catalyst specific surface area of 243, 250 and 252 m2/g. Regarding claims 8-9, ‘563, paragraph 97, teaches vacuum drying under the vibration may be performed at 1 to 200 mbar. Regarding claim 10, ‘563 teaches vacuum drying under the vibration may be carried out at 175-300oC. Regarding claim 11, ‘563, paragraph 107, teaches the heat treatment may be carried out at 600 to 800 ℃, it is preferably carried out at 650 to 750 ℃. The heat treatment may be performed for 1 to 12 hours, preferably 2 to 8 hours. Regarding claim 12, ‘563, paragraph 117, teaches the supported catalyst may be introduced into a reactor. Subsequently, the gaseous carbonaceous compound or the gaseous carbonaceous compound and the reducing gas. Carbon nanotubes can be grown by chemical vapor phase synthesis through the decomposition of a carbon-based compound in a gaseous state by injecting a mixed gas of hydrogen or the like and a carrier gas (for example, nitrogen). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US20100158788 teaches a supported catalyst. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEFANIE J COHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5836. The examiner can normally be reached 10am- 6pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Coris Fung can be reached at (571) 270-5713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEFANIE J COHEN/Examiner, Art Unit 1732 3/5/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600841
Biodegradable Composition and Method of Preparation Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595411
Series of Alkali Metal Borophosphates Compounds, and Alkali Metal Borophosphates Nonlinear Optical Crystals as well as Preparation Method and Application thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595179
SYNTHESIS OF UNIFORM DIAMOND NANOPARTICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590205
HIGHLY SOLUBLE PEA STARCH AS REPLACER OF MALTODEXTRIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590008
PROCESS FOR PRODUCING HIGH PURITY ALUMINIUM MATERIALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+2.7%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 954 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month