Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/281,986

Driving Device And Blood Pump

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 14, 2023
Priority
Dec 03, 2021 — CN 202111479375.7 +1 more
Examiner
FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Shenzhen Core Medical Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
647 granted / 815 resolved
+9.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
850
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
60.8%
+20.8% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 815 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 7-10 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D’Ambrosio et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication Number: US 2017/0348470 A1, hereinafter “D’Ambrosio”). Regarding claim 1, D’Ambrosio teaches a drive device, comprising: a drive housing (i.e. motor housing, e.g.105 Fig.1, [0044]); a shaft sleeve assembly (e.g. 103 Fig. 1,5) fixedly connected to the drive housing, wherein the shaft sleeve assembly is provided with a receiving cavity and a detection port communicated with the receiving cavity (e.g. [0052], Figs. 5-7 show a barrier bump 123 that receives a sensor), and the detection port is located on an outer wall of the shaft sleeve assembly (e.g. Figs. 5-7 show a barrier bump 123 that receives a sensor, [0053]); a rotating shaft (i.e. drive shaft e.g. 104 Figs.1,2,4,5), rotatably passing through the shaft sleeve assembly; a drive component (i.e. motor e.g. 110 Fig.1), mounted on the drive housing and capable of driving the rotating shaft to rotate; and a sensor assembly (e.g. 1020 Figs.1,2) comprising a sensor (i.e. optical sensor e.g. [0008], [0053],[0054], the sensor comprising a probe (e.g. Fig.9,[0067]) , wherein the probe is received in the receiving cavity, a position of the probe corresponds to a position of the detection port (e.g. Figs.4-8), and the probe is capable of detecting a fluid pressure (e.g. [0022]) outside the drive device. Regarding claim 7, D’Ambrosio teaches the sensor assembly (e.g.1100 Fig. 11,1200 Fig. 12) further comprises a soft filler assembly (e.g.1123 Fig 11 and 1223 Fig.12), wherein, the soft filler is provided between the probe and a cavity wall of the receiving cavity; and/or, the soft filler is provided at the detection port, the soft filler seals the detection port (e.g.1123 Fig 11 and 1223 Fig.12), and the soft filler is capable of transmitting the received fluid pressure to the probe (e.g. [0069]). Regarding claim 8, D’Ambrosio teaches that the sensor (e.g. 1020 Fig1, 4-8, 1900 Fig. 9. Figs 10-12) is an optical fiber pressure sensor (e.g. [0047],[0056],[0067]), the sensor further comprises a transmission fiber (e.g. 1924 Fig.9, 2024Fig. 10, 1124Fig.11, 1224 Fig.12) connected to the probe, and an end of the transmission fiber adjacent to the probe is received in the receiving cavity (e.g. Fig.5). Regarding claim 9, D’Ambrosio teaches the receiving cavity (e.g. [0053]: recess holds the sensor Figs 4-8 specifically seen in Fig.7) further comprises a communication port, the transmission fiber passes through the communication port, one end of the transmission fiber is received in the receiving cavity and is connected to the probe, the other end of the transmission fiber is extended from the communication port into the drive housing (e.g. Fig.8), a sealing element ( e.g. 2028 Fig.Fig.10-12,[0069]: glue) is provided at the communication port, and the sealing element prevents the receiving cavity from being communicated with the drive housing through the communication port (e.g. Figs. 7,8 and 10-12 show the sensor head which is in the recess of the blood pump in the barrier element and is sealed with glue). Regarding claim 10, D’Ambrosio teaches the sensor assembly further comprises a packaging tube, a portion of the transmission fiber outside the receiving cavity is packaged in the packaging tube (e.g. 1024 Fig. 4 shows the transmission fiber in a packaging tube outside the receing cavity). Regarding claim 18, D’Ambrosio teaches a blood pump (e.g. 101 Fig.1) comprising a rotatable impeller (e.g. 113 Fig.6, [0049],[0050]) and the drive device according to claim 1 (as discussed above). Regarding claim 19, D’Ambrosio teaches the blood pump (e.g. 101 Fig.1) further comprises a cannula assembly (e.g. 102 Fig.1,2) fixedly connected to the drive device (e.g. 110 Fig.1), the cannula assembly (e.g. 102 Fig.1,2) is provided with an outflow port (i.e. outflow cage 400 with outflow port 125 Fig.5 e.g. [0052]) Figs. 4-8), and the impeller (e.g. 113 Figs 5,6 and 8) is capable of rotatably being received in the cannula assembly, and wherein a position of the detection port corresponds to a position of the outflow port, or the position of the detection port is adjacent to the outflow port( e.g. Figs.1,2 4-8 show the sensor assembly 1020 and the detection port comprising the barrier bump, visor notch and sensor visor are located at the outflow cage). Regarding claim 20, D’Ambrosio teaches that the blood pump further comprises a catheter assembly (i.e. catheter shaft e.g. 106 Fig.1,2) fixedly connected to the drive housing, the catheter assembly is capable of passing perfusate ([0050]: purge fluid passed through a lumen) into the drive housing, a gap for the perfusate to pass through is provided between the rotating shaft and the shaft sleeve assembly, and the probe is sealed in the receiving cavity (e.g. [0050]: plurality of lumens, transmission fiber of the probe is in a separate lumen and the sensor head 721 Fig.5 of the sensor probe 1020 lies in the barrier bump. The sensor assembly details as shown in Figs 9-12 show that the sensor is sealed e.g. Figs 9-12, [0069). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 11 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D’Ambrosio et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication Number: US 2017/0348470 A1, hereinafter “D’Ambrosio”) in view of Siess et al (U.S. Patent Number: US 5964694, hereinafter “Siess”). Regarding claims 11 and 12, D’Ambrosio teaches the claimed invention as discussed above and teaches magnetic drive components transfer torque from the blood pump motor to the impeller 113 ( e.g. [0049]) but does not specifically teach that the drive component (i.e. motor) comprises a drive stator and a magnetic assembly, wherein the drive stator comprises a plurality of first magnetic cores and a plurality of first coils respectively wound around the plurality of first magnetic cores, and the plurality of first magnetic cores are arranged at intervals around the axis of the rotating shaft for one circle, the drive stator is fixedly connected to the drive housing, the drive stator and the rotating shaft are spaced along an axis of the rotating shaft, the magnetic assembly comprises a first magnet, the first magnet is fixedly connected to the rotating shaft, wherein the drive stator is capable of generating a rotating magnetic field which drives the first magnet to rotate to drive the rotating shaft to rotate. In a similar field of endeavor, Seiss teaches a blood pump comprising a drive unit (e.g. 11 Fig. 4) that comprises a drive stator (e.g. 24 Fig 4) and a magnetic assembly that comprises a plurality of first magnetic cores and a plurality of first coils respectively wound around the plurality of first magnetic cores, and the plurality of first magnetic cores are arranged at intervals around the axis of the rotating shaft for one circle (i.e. small ferritic ring-shaped layers and of interior windings), the drive stator is fixedly connected to the drive housing (e.g. col. 6 lines 26-47: stator 24 is solidly attached to the interior of motor housing 20), the drive stator and the rotating shaft ( e.g. 25 Fig.4) are spaced along an axis of the rotating shaft, the magnetic assembly comprises a first magnet (e.g. col. 6 lines 26-47), the first magnet is fixedly connected to the rotating shaft, wherein the drive stator is capable of generating a rotating magnetic field which drives the first magnet to rotate to drive the rotating shaft to rotate. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the drive component in the teachings of D’Ambrosio with the teachings of Seiss in order to provide the predictable results of providing a reliable, safe and efficient pumping mechanism with optimum performance. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6 and 13-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: While the prior art generally teaches the claimed subject matter of a pump and a drive device comprising a detection port with an optical sensor assembly located adjacent to an outflow portion of the blood pump cannula, the prior art does not disclose or fairly render unpatentable the combination of elements including the configuration of claim 2 that includes an adapter sleeve that is fixedly connected to the drive housing, the first shaft sleeve is fixedly connected to the adapter sleeve, and the rotating shaft is capable of rotatably passing through the first shaft sleeve and the adapter sleeve, and wherein, the receiving cavity is at least partially located on the first shaft sleeve, and the detection port is at least partially located on the first shaft sleeve; or, both the receiving cavity and the detection port are located on the adapter sleeve. Additionally, the prior art fails to disclose or fairly render unpatentable the limitations of claim 13 drawn to a power stator fixedly connected to the drive housing, the power stator and the drive stator are arranged along the axis of the rotating shaft, the rotating shaft is capable of rotatably passing through the power stator, the magnetic assembly further comprises a second magnet, the second magnet is fixedly connected to the rotating shaft, the power stator is capable of generating a rotating magnetic field which drives the second magnet to rotate as required by the claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MALLIKA DIPAYAN FAIRCHILD whose telephone number is (571)270-7043. The examiner can normally be reached Monday- Friday 8 am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BENJAMIN KLEIN can be reached at 571-270-5213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MALLIKA D FAIRCHILD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 14, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629077
WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR WITH IMPROVED ECG ELECTRODES
3y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629511
Electrode Assembly for Applying Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) that Includes a Plurality of Thermally Linked but Electrically Isolated Graphite Sheets
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12616837
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR EXTRACOCHLEAR STIMULATION
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12605540
ENERGY STIMULATION DEVICE PROVIDED WITH A STIMULATION TRANSMITTER
4y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12605536
THIN FILM ELECTRODES FOR BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE AND METHODS OF MICROFABRICATING
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+18.5%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 815 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month