Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/282,132

Lifting Device for Article Lifting

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 14, 2023
Examiner
JOERGER, KAITLIN S
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sanden Retail Systems Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1008 granted / 1162 resolved
+34.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1196
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1162 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Razumov (US 2016/0016731). Regarding claim 1, Razumov teaches a lifting device for raising and lowering an article, comprising: a first lifting unit, 22, including a base, 220, a first lifting platform, 260, disposed above the base, and a first lifting system, 280, which is provided between the base and the first lifting platform and which raises and lowers the first lifting platform, see paragraphs 0037-0038, and a second lifting unit, 100, disposed above the first lifting unit, including a second lifting platform, 106, disposed above the first lifting platform, and a second lifting system, 110, which raises and lowers the second lifting platform, see paragraphs 0042-0044. Regarding claim 2, Razumov teaches the first lifting system, 280, is a pantograph type lifting system, see paragraph 0038. Regarding claim 3, Razumov teaches the second lifting system includes a pair of vertical frames, 108, which faces apart from each other in a direction orthogonal to a lifting direction of the second lifting platform, and the second lifting system raises and lowers the second lifting platform between and along the pair of vertical frames, see figures 4 and 5. Regarding claim 4, Razumov teaches the first lifting unit is arranged in an inner region of the pair of the vertical frames in a plan view in which the second lifting unit is viewed from above, figure 1 shows that the first lifting unit is the width of one row of containers and an the second lifting unit is the width of the entire rack, and therefore the first lifting unit when underneath the second lifting unit is arranged as claimed. Regarding claim 5, Razumov teaches the first lifting system of the first lifting unit has a lifting stroke capable of reaching at least a lower limit region of a lifting range of the second lifting platform which is raised and lowered by the second lifting system, when the first lifting system is maximally extended, figure 9 shows that both the first lifting unit and the second lifting unit are capable to reaching the R2 level of the storage rack when fully extended. Regarding claim 6, Razumov teaches the first lifting units are provided at multiple locations spaced apart in a direction orthogonal to the lifting direction in a lower region of the second lifting unit, see figure 1, which shoes three first lifting units spaced apart underneath each of the three rows of the storage rack. Claim(s) 1 and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN 211594885, as cited by applicant. Regarding claim 1, CN ‘885 teaches a lifting device for raising and lowering an article, comprising: a first lifting unit including a base, 1, a first lifting platform, 2, disposed above the base, and a first lifting system, 12-16, which is provided between the base and the first lifting platform and which raises and lowers the first lifting platform, and a second lifting unit disposed above the first lifting unit, including a second lifting platform, 3, disposed above the first lifting platform, and a second lifting system, 4-9, which raises and lowers the second lifting platform, see figure 1. Regarding claim 7, CN ‘885 teaches the second lifting unit is mounted on the first lifting platform of the first lifting unit, see figure 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Prior art cited on the PTO and not relied upon are included to show additional examples of lifting devices similar to the claimed invention. The cited prior art is considered the best prior art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAITLIN S JOERGER whose telephone number is (571)272-6938. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5 (CST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at (571)272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAITLIN S JOERGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652 20 November 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 14, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600323
CARRIAGE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583672
MULTI-LEVEL CONTAINER STORAGE SYSTEM AND HIGH-BAY CONTAINER STORAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577043
APPARATUS FOR MOVING TRANSPORT CONTAINERS BETWEEN A CONTAINER STACK AND A CONTAINER RACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581901
SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESS EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570466
STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, HIGH-BAY WAREHOUSE, STORAGE METHOD AND RETRIEVAL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1162 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month