Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/282,294

TRANSORAL ROBOTIC SIMULATOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 15, 2023
Examiner
FERNSTROM, KURT
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

66%
Career Allow Rate
1045 granted / 1584 resolved
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
48 pending
1632
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 4-19 are objected to under 37 CFR 1.75(c) as being in improper form because a multiple dependent claim cannot depend from any other multiple dependent claim. See MPEP § 608.01(n). Accordingly, the claims have not been further treated on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geoghegan (WO2019/246525) in view of Hofstetter. Geoghegan discloses in the Figures and specification a transoral robotic surgery (TORS) simulator system (see Figs. 3 & 4C and p. 2, lines. 23-30) comprising: a three-dimensional human head model (p. 16, lines 15-20) comprising an oral cavity (Fig. 3, p. 8, lines 17-19) comprising synthetic material (Fig. 3, p. 9, lines 4-10), wherein the oral cavity comprises a mandible structure (Fig. 3) and a simulated human tongue (Fig. 3, p. 8, lines 19-21), wherein the simulated human tongue comprises a silicone material (p. 9, lines 15-19); at least one artificial tissue attached within the oral cavity wherein the artificial tissue is configured to mimic a biological tissue (see artificial tumor model at p. 8, line 23 to p. 9, line 6). Geoghegan does not disclose the provision of a marker on or within the artificial tissue (synthetic tumor) as recited. However, this feature is known in the art, as taught for example by Hofstetter at paragraph [0062], and would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art for the purpose of allowing a user to more easily visually distinguish the artificial tissue from the other elements of the simulator system. With respect to claim 2, Geoghegan discloses at p. 7, lines 21-23 and p. 12, lines 19-23 that the system is configured for use with a robotic surgical system controlled by the user. With respect to claim 3, Geoghegan discloses at p. 7, line 29 to p. 8, line 2 an embodiment where its model is made via an additive manufacturing process. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KURT FERNSTROM whose telephone number is (571)272-4422. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached at 571-270-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KURT FERNSTROM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715 November 20, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 15, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12588778
UPLIFTED HANDS ASSIST DEVICE FOR PRAYING LIKE MOSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12567342
Fluid Simulation Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562078
VEIN SIMULATOR SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12555493
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MANIPULATIVES FOR INSTRUCTION IN EXPONENTS AND LOGARITHMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12555494
VASCULAR ACCESS TRAINING SIMULATOR SYSTEM AND TRANSPARENT ANATOMICAL MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1584 resolved cases by this examiner