Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/283,205

APPARATUS AND METHOD TO IMPLEMENT SHARED VIRTUAL MEMORY IN A TRUSTED ZONE

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Sep 20, 2023
Priority
Mar 26, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021083178
Examiner
WU, BENJAMIN C
Art Unit
2195
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
461 granted / 527 resolved
+32.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
552
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§103
81.3%
+41.3% vs TC avg
§102
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 527 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 28–47 are presented for examination in PCT international application filed on 03/26/2021 (PCT/CN2021/083178), and entered the national stage on 09/20/2023. Claims 1–27 are cancelled. Drawings 3. The drawings were received on 09/20/2023 (upon national stage entry). These drawings are acceptable. Claim Objections 4. Claim 38 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 38 appear to be dependent from claim 37 (as opposed to the currently recited claim 10 which is cancelled.). For purposes of examination, they will be construed to be dependent upon claim 37. APPROPRIATE CORRECTION ARE REQUIRED. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 (Computer Medium) 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. 5. Claims 46–47 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because it is directed to non-statutory subject matter and thus do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter. 6. As to claims 46–47, they are directed to a “machine-readable medium having program code executed thereon.” Under current Office examination procedure, and absent clear definition or exclusion by the Applicant to the contrary, the broadest reasonable interpretation of a machine-readable medium can encompass non-statutory, transitory forms of signal transmission, such as a propagating electrical or electromagnetic signal per se. See MPEP § 2106.03, Eligibility Step 1: The Four Categories of Statutory Subject Matter. (see Applicant’s Specification, paragraph 192: “Such electronic devices store and communicate (internally and/or with other electronic devices over a network) code and data using computer machine-readable media, such as non-transitory computer machine-readable storage media ( e.g., magnetic disks; optical disks; random access memory; read only memory; flash memory devices; phase-change memory) and transitory computer machine-readable communication media (e.g., electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals-such as carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.” — which describes a type of “machine-readable” media as transitory). Accordingly, the claimed “machine-readable medium” is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Applicant is advised to amend this portion of the claim to recite a “non-transitory machine-readable medium” to overcome the 101 rejection. Allowable Subject Matter 7. Claims 28–45 are allowed. Claims 46–47 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the applied 101 rejections set forth in this action. The following is the Examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record, when viewed individually or in combination, does not expressly teach nor render obvious the features of independent claims 28, 37, and 46 when viewed as a whole, specific to the limitation(s) of: “accessing, by the IOMMU, an entry in a first translation table using at least the first address space identifier to determine that the memory access request is directed to the first private memory region which is not directly accessible to the IOMMU, generating, by the IOMMU, an address translation request associated with the memory access request, wherein based on the address translation request, a virtual machine monitor (VMM) running on one or more of the plurality of cores is to initiate a secure transaction sequence with trust domain manager to cause a secure entry into the first trust domain to translate the GVA to a physical address based on the address space identifier.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN C WU whose telephone number is (571)270-5906. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 8:30 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aimee J. Li can be reached on (571)272-4169. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN C WU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2195 February 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 20, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639188
TENANT RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION (TRO) IN CLOUDS
3y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632314
ELASTIC PROVISIONING OF CONTAINER-BASED GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT (GPU) NODES
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12632297
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AGGREGATE RESOURCE-BASED FLEX ON DEMAND IN A MULTI-API VIRTUAL DESKTOP INFRASTRUCTURE (VDI) ENVIRONMENT
2y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12619475
APPLICATION EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT SELECTION BASED ON RESOURCE USAGE PROFILES
4y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12619465
MAINTAINING WORKLOAD DATA COHERENCY BETWEEN LOCAL AND REMOTE ACCELERATORS
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.2%)
2y 11m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 527 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month