Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/283,520

TOW ELEMENT AND METHOD FOR TOWING A BICYCLE WITH A TOW LIFT

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Priority
Mar 24, 2021 — NO 20210382 +2 more
Examiner
MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Simon Hanl
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1243 granted / 1516 resolved
+30.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1550
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§102
43.0%
+3.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1516 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION The Information Disclosure Statement filed on September 22, 2023 has been reviewed and considered by the Examiner. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Regarding claim 21, the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 15, 21-24 and 28-32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rieger (DE 19856755 A1) in view of Phillips (WO 2006/083838). Rieger discloses a tow element, generally shown in figure 1, to connect a bicycle 6 to a tow lift 1. The tow element is comprised of a tube 11 extending from the tow rope 1, downward to the bicycle to attach to the handlebars 9 of the bicycle. Rieger discloses the tow element as described above but does not specifically show a loop to connect the tube to the bicycle. Phillips discloses a tube 103 to connect a pair of bicycles together. The connecting tube is comprised of two sections. The first section 103A, is connected to the rear of a first bike and the second section 103B is connected to the front of the second bicycle as shown in figure 2. Figures 3 and 4 show an exploded view of a metal loop structure to connect the two bicycles. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the instant invention, to have utilized a loop structure, like that of Phillips, and applied it to a tow rope system, like that of Rieger, with the expected result of providing a more safe and secure attachment for the bicycle and the tow rope. The above combination of Rieger and Phillips discloses the tow element and loop. However, there is no mention of the tow loop having a polymer coating. It is well known in the art to use polymer coatings to cover metal components from damage or corrosion. Therefore, it would have been an obvious design choice to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the instant invention, to have coated a loop, like that of Phillips, with a polymer coating with the expected result of coating the loop to prevent corrosion and damage to the loop and to extend the lifespan of the loop. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-20 and 25-27 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Robert J McCarry Jr. whose telephone number is (571)272-6683. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, S. Joseph Morano can be reached at 571-272-6684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Robert J McCarry Jr/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615 RJM February 6, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12612088
OBSTACLE DETECTION DEVICE AND OBSTACLE DETECTION METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12612091
RAILROAD CROSSING CONTROL SYSTEM WITH AUXILIARY SHUNTING DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12606962
TRACK RAIL FASTENING SYSTEM AND RAIL CUSHION FOR SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606387
System and Method for Achieving Position Detection Integrity in an Independent Cart System
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12595628
TRACK RAIL FASTENER STRUCTURED FOR DISPLACEMENT RESTRAINT
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+16.5%)
2y 9m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1516 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month