Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/283,913

MODULAR, CUSTOMIZABLE, PREFABRICATED BUILDING ENVELOPE SYSTEM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 25, 2023
Priority
Mar 26, 2021 — provisional 63/166,367 +1 more
Examiner
KATCHEVES, BASIL S
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Feris Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
900 granted / 1245 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1274
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
84.7%
+44.7% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1245 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5, 7, 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, “the C-shaped light gauge galvanized steel framing members” lacks antecedent basis. Claims 2-5, 7, 10 are rejected for depending from claim 1. Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to, claim 2 recites “one or more wall panels comprise” but should recite “one or more of said wall panels”. Claim 4 is objected to, claim 4 recites “wherein each wall panels wall includes” and should recite “wherein each of the wall panels includes” . Claim 5 is objected to, claim 5 recites “each wall panels wall includes” and should recite “each of the wall panels includes”. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/15/25 have been fully considered and are persuasive in light of the recent claim amendments. Final determination of allowability will be dependent on the Applicant’s correction of 112 issues. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Basil Katcheves whose telephone number is (571)272-6846. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 8:00 am to 6:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached on (571)272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BASIL S KATCHEVES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637901
Foldable Wall Systems
4y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631016
STRUCTURAL ASSEMBLY USING DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT ANCHORS
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631017
BRACKET SYSTEM FOR ATTACHING A CANTILEVERED PERGOLA TO A ROOF RAFTER
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631018
BRACKET SYSTEM FOR ATTACHING A CANTILEVERED PERGOLA TO A ROOF RAFTER
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627252
TRESTLE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+17.5%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1245 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month