Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/283,933

TERMINAL APPARATUS, METHOD, AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 25, 2023
Examiner
CHEN, PETER
Art Unit
2462
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
398 granted / 455 resolved
+29.5% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
479
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.8%
+7.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 455 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Applicant's response filed on 01/16/2026 has been entered and made of record. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Status Claims 4 and 5 are amended. No claims are cancelled nor added. Claims 4 and 5 are currently pending for examination. Response to Arguments Applicant's Remarks (on page 4), filed 01/16/2026, with respect to Objection to Title have been fully considered and Applicant has amended the title. The objection to Specification has been withdrawn in view of the amendment to the title. Applicant's Remarks (on page 4), filed 01/16/2026, with respect to Objection to Claims have been fully considered and Applicant has amended claim 4 to delete the “/” operator. The objection to claim 4 has been withdrawn in view of the amendment. Applicant's arguments, filed 01/16/2026, with respect to claims 4 and 5 have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. The amendments to the claims necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection discussed below. This Office action is made Final. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by TSAI (US 2022/0264686 A1) hereinafter “Tsai”. Regarding claims 4 and 5, Tsai discloses Claim 4 of a terminal (see FIG. 2; see ¶ [0057], user equipment) comprising: and Claim 5 of a communication method using a terminal apparatus, the communication comprising: processing circuitry (see FIG. 2; see ¶ [0057] [0062], a controller/processor) configured to communicate with a base station device using a master cell group (MCG) and a secondary cell group (SCG) (see ¶ [0039], the UE may be communicatively connected to a Master Cell Group (MCG) and a Secondary Cell Group (SCG)); and reception circuitry (see FIG. 2; see ¶ [0057], a wireless transceiver) configured to receive a radio resource control (RRC) message (see FIG. 3; see ¶ [0073-74], the UE receives an RRC message), wherein the processing circuitry is configured to: determine to perform SCG deactivation from a state in which the SCG is activated in a case that the RRC message includes an indication of the SCG deactivation (see FIG. 3; see ¶ [0073-74] [0077-80], the UE determines whether the indicator is for suspension/deactivation of the SCG, the UE may further deactivate the PSCell and all SCells of the SCG in response to the RRC message including an indicator for suspension/deactivation of the SCG), determine not to perform the SCG deactivation in a case that the RRC message does not include the indication of the SCG deactivation (see FIG. 3; see ¶ [0081], if the indicator is for resumption of the SCG or activation of the PSCell, then the UE will not perform the SCG deactivation), and in a case that the SCG deactivation is determined to be performed, stop an ongoing random access procedure in the SCG (see FIG. 3; see ¶ [0079-80], the UE suspends SCG transmission for all radio bearers and stop PDCCH monitoring i.e., stop on going random access procedure). Conclusion The prior art made of record (see attached PTO-892) and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Min (US 2024/0147543 A1) teaches “A terminal receives a message including a reconfiguration instruction of the secondary cell group. When the secondary cell group is in an inactive state and the secondary cell is added or changed, the terminal stops the random access procedure for a prescribed time even if the secondary cell is reconfigured based on the reconfiguration instruction” (see Abstract). Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7241. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00am to 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yemane Mesfin can be reached at (571) 272-3927. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2462
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 25, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 16, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604361
TECHNIQUES FOR DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION COLLISION RESOLUTION FOR MULTI-SIM USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593242
APPLICATION SPECIFIC TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL PROFILE PARAMETERS TO IMPROVE RESILIENCY IN COMMUNICATION SERVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574168
COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES, INFRASTRUCTURE EQUIPMENT AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATING VIA AN ACCESS INTERFACE DIVIDED INTO MULTIPLE BANDWIDTH PARTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568457
Time of Arrival Method for UE Positioning in Distributed RAN System Architecture
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557161
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SECONDARY NODE OR CELL GROUP ADDITION IN A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.5%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 455 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month