Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/284,258

LOCK

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 26, 2023
Examiner
BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kingsway Enterprises (Uk) Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
755 granted / 1129 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1166
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§102
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1129 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Number 6,993,946 to Shen. Shen discloses a lock for installation in a door leaf defining a first plane, the lock comprising: a housing (71); a bolt (72) moveable relative to the housing between a retracted position, and an extended position in which a distal portion of the bolt protrudes from an opening (712) in the housing, and a lock mechanism (76, 81, 82) configured to selectively engage the bolt in order to selectively retain the bolt in the retracted position (column 5, lines 30-35); wherein the distal portion of the bolt comprises a sloped upper shoulder (upper tine of the bifurcated bolt is sloped in the direction of the doorframe) and a sloped lower shoulder (lower tine of the bifurcated bolt is sloped in the direction of the doorframe), such that the bolt is moveable into the retracted position in response to a force applied to the at least one shoulder (shown in figures 6, 9 and 10); and wherein the lock mechanism comprises a follower (81, 82) and a cam (76), wherein the follower is configured to rotate the cam, and wherein the cam is configured to selectively engage a corresponding surface of the bolt; wherein the follower is rotatable between: a first rotational position (figure 3) in which the cam is disengaged from the bolt such that the bolt is resiliently biased into the extended position; and a second rotational position (figure 4) in which the cam engages the corresponding surface of the bolt to retain the bolt in the retracted position; wherein movement of the follower from the first rotational position to the second rotational position causes the cam to move the bolt into the retracted position (column 5, lines 30-35), as in claim 1. Shen also discloses the bolt is in the extended position, the slope of the at least one shoulder extends at least to the opening (shown in figures 6, 9 and 10), as in claim 2, and the distal portion of the bolt is rounded to form the at least one shoulder (shown in figures 6, 9 and 10), as in claim 3, further comprising a shroud (724) arranged within the housing to conceal an interior of the housing when the bolt is in the retracted position (as shown in figure 4), as in claim 4, wherein the shroud extends proximally from the opening (aligned with the opening), as in claim 5, and the shroud at least partially encases the bolt (retains the bolt in an operational status), as in claim 6. Shen further discloses the lock mechanism further comprises: a first spindle (63) extending from a first side of the lock; wherein the first spindle is translatable relative to the follower between a first position in which the first spindle is rotationally coupled with the follower; and a second position in which the first spindle is rotationally decoupled from the follower (figures 9-11), as in claim 7, further comprises: a second spindle (53) extending from a second side of the lock; wherein the second spindle is rotationally coupled with the follower (shown in figure 6), as in claim 8, and the second spindle is configured to be rotatable relative to the first spindle (column 6, lines 52-60), as in claim 10, as well as the second spindle is translationally coupled with the first spindle, such that translation of the second spindle relative to the follower causes the first spindle to translate relative to the follower (column 6, lines 52-60), as in claim 11, wherein the second spindle is rotationally coupled with the follower when the first spindle is in each of the first position and the second position (shown in figures 6, 9 and 10), as in claim 12. Shen additionally teaches the first spindle and the second spindle collectively form a split spindle (figure 7), as in claim 13, and translational travel of the second spindle is limited so as to prevent rotational disengagement of the second spindle from the follower (figure 9), as in claim 14, as well as the first spindle is coupled with a first handle (61), and the second spindle is coupled with a second handle (51), as in claim 15, wherein a rotational range of motion of the first handle is less than that of the follower (limited by engagement between the spindle and the follower), as in claim 16, additionally the first spindle is resiliently biased (via 54) into one of the first position and the second position, as in claim 9. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed November 26, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to the argument that Shen does not teach a sloped upper shoulder and a sloped lower shoulder as recited in the claims, the examiner respectfully disagrees. Without any recitation regarding direction of the sloped surfaces of the bolt, any upper and lower sloped surfaces can be considered to meet the limitation of the recited claims; accordingly, the bifurcated structure of the latch bolt has an upper tine and a lower tine where each have a surface the is sloped in a direction of the given door jamb and keeper, allowing retraction of the bolt when the bolt comes into contact with the keeper. In regards to the applicant’s argument that Shen does not teach a bolt moving into the retracted position in response to a force applied to at least one shoulder, as recited in the amended claims, would impermissibly change the principle of operation of Shen, the examiner respectfully disagrees. The passage the applicant cited is in reference to the auxiliary bolt preventing the latch bolt from being retracted when the door is in a closed orientation and the latch bolt is locked, not when an exterior force is being applied to the shoulders of the latch bolt, such as a keeper interacting with the latch bolt during the operation of closing the door. Moreover, the sloped surfaces of the latch bolt enable the latch bolt to be retracted when an exterior force is applied, by allowing the exterior force to slide along the sloped surface retracting the latch bolt to more easily place the latch bolt into a given keeper within a door frame. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER J BOSWELL whose telephone number is (571)272-7054. The examiner can normally be reached M-R: 9-4; F 9-12. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Fulton can be reached at 571-272-7376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER J BOSWELL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675 CJB /cb/ January 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
May 27, 2025
Interview Requested
Jun 04, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 04, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 11, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 02, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Oct 27, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 03, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 03, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 23, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577827
SAFE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577809
LOCK APPARATUSES WITH SECONDARY LOCKING MECHANISMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577810
DISPENSER LOCKING ASSEMBLIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577805
LOCK ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF INSTALLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577812
SECURITY TAG HOLDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+26.7%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1129 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month