Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/284,469

AEROSOL-GENERATING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Examiner
WEILER, NICHOLAS JOSEPH
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kt&G Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
48%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
95 granted / 150 resolved
-1.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -15% lift
Without
With
+-15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
177
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
65.7%
+25.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 150 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Anderson et al. (US 2021/0112880 A1). Regarding claim 1, Anderson teaches an aerosol-generating device (Fig. 1B) comprising a housing (Fig. 2A, Ref. Num. 102). The housing comprises an insertion space (Fig. 2A, Opening on top) in communication with an exterior of the housing, an elongated probe (Fig. 2A, Ref. Num. 62) coupled to the housing and comprising a first end (End of Probe before foldback, end that sticks out most) where the elongated probe is movable from the insertion space to an interior of the housing (Fig. 2B, Ref. Num. 132). Anderson also teaches a pressure sensor (Fig. 2B, Ref. Num. 129) coupled to the housing and located adjacent to the first end of the elongated probe. Regarding claim 2, Anderson teaches that the aerosol-generating device comprises a support (Fig.2B, Ref. Num. 101) protruding toward the elongated probe, wherein the support is located adjacent to a side surface of the elongated probe. Regarding claim 3, Anderson teaches that the elongated probe comprises a rib (Fig. 2B, Bent back part at end of probe) protruding from the side surface of the elongated probe where the support and the rib are aligned in a longitudinal direction with respect to the elongated probe. Regarding claim 4, Anderson teaches that the rib Fig. 2B, Bent back part at end of probe) is located between the support (Fig.2B, Ref. Num. 101) and the pressure sensor (Fig. 2B, Ref. Num. 129), and when the elongated probe moves to the insertion space, the rib is caught by the support. Regarding claim 5, Anderson teaches that when the elongated probe (Fig. 2A, Ref. Num. 62) moves from the insertion space to the interior of the housing (Fig. 2B, Ref. Num. 132), the pressure sensor (Fig. 2B, Ref. Num. 129) is in contact with the first end of the elongated probe. Regarding claim 6, Anderson teaches that the pressure sensor is in the shape of a circle (Fig. 2C, Ref. Num. 129), so the side surface facing the elongated probe is convex towards the probe. Regarding claim 7, Anderson teaches that the aerosol-generating comprises a container located in the housing (Fig. 1, Ref. Num. 55; Para. [0197]), wherein the container is configured to store a liquid (Para. [0197]), a wick disposed at the insertion space (Para. [0197]), wherein the wick comprises a portion connected to the container (Para. [0187]), and a heater disposed near the wick (Fig. 1, Ref. Num. 26), wherein the heater is configured to apply heat to the wick (Para. [0187]). Regarding claim 8, Anderson teaches that the housing further comprises a holder with a hole to receive the elongated probe (Fig. 2B, Ref. Num. 132). Regarding claim 9, Anderson teaches that the wick (Fig. 1, inside the atomizer) is spaced apart from the hole in a radial direction of the hole (Fig. 1, underneath the receptacle contacts). Regarding claim 10, Anderson teaches that the hole has a shape corresponding to a cross-section of the elongated probe (Fig. 2C, Ref. Num. 132). Regarding claim 11, Anderson teaches that the insertion space (Fig. 2B, Ref. Num. 132) is elongated in a longitudinal direction of the elongated probe (Fig. 2A, Ref. Num. 62), and that the elongated probe comprises a second end (Fi g. 2A, end after the foldback portion) located opposite to the first end of the elongated probe and located at a center of a cross-section of the insertion space. Regarding claim 12, Anderson teaches that the elongated probe comprises a first part (See Recreated Fig. 2B Below) elongated from the first end of the elongated probe, where the first part is movable through the hole, a second part (See Recreated Fig. 2B Below) elongated from the second end of the elongated probe, where the second part is movable in a longitudinal direction of the insertion space, and a third part (See Recreated Fig. 2B Below) connecting the first part and the second part and intersecting a longitudinal direction of the first part or the second part. PNG media_image1.png 219 368 media_image1.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS J WEILER whose telephone number is (571)272-2664. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at (571) 270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.J.W./Examiner, Art Unit 1749 /KATELYN W SMITH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1749
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600175
TIRE TREAD WITH THREE SIPE LEVELS AND TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594789
TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12570111
PNEUMATIC TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12545057
NOISE-REDUCING TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12533910
TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
48%
With Interview (-15.2%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 150 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month