Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/285,167

LAMINATE, RELEASE AGENT COMPOSITION, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PROCESSED SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Sep 29, 2023
Examiner
KRUER, KEVIN R
Art Unit
1787
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nissan Chemical Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
27%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 7m
To Grant
56%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 27% of cases
27%
Career Allow Rate
212 granted / 798 resolved
-38.4% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 7m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
853
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 798 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 1/27/2026 has been fully considered. An initialed cope of said IDS is enclosed herein. Drawings The drawings filed 9/29/2023 are accepted. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II, claims 10-15, in the reply filed on 6/26/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-9 and 16-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 6/26/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 10, 11, 13, and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liao (PG-PUB 2020/0239744). Liao teaches a release agent composition comprising: 2 hydroxy,4-methoxybenzophenone (0065), a compound that has a structure for absorbing the light and contains at least one hydroxy group [0020], [0064]-[0066]; and polydimethylsiloxane, an organosiloxane polymer [0057]-[0059]. The 2 hydroxy,4-methoxybenzophenone taught by Liao is understood to anticipate the structure of claim 10 because it is one of the claimed species of compound listed in claim 10. With regards to the limitations of claim 10 that the composition is “for forming a release layer of laminate including a semiconductor substate, a support substrate, and an adhesive layer and a release layer that are provided between the semiconductor substrate and the support substrate,” and “used of release the semiconductor substrate and the support substrate after the release layer absorbs light emitted form a side of the support substrate,” said limitations are understood to be intended use and purpose limitations which do not define any of the claimed invention’s limitations; thus, said preamble limitations are not considered limitations and are of no significance to claim construction (see MPEP 2111.02). With regards to claim 11, 2 hydroxy,4-methoxybenzophenone has two or more aromatic rings constituting an electron conjugate system. With regards to claim 13, 2 hydroxy,4-methoxybenzophenone has a structure comprising benzophenone. Liao teaches the release agent composition further comprising polydimethylsiloxane, an organosiloxane polymer [0057]-[0059]. With regards to claim 15, the polydimethylsiloxane reads on the claimed siloxane units. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 12 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liao (PG-PUB 2020/0239744), as applied to claims above, and further in view of Itoh (US 2014/0323652). Liao is relied upon as above. Specifically, Liao teaches the 2 hydroxy,4-methoxybenzophenone may be utilized as a UV-absorbent in an organopolysiloxane curable composition, but does not teach other UV-absorbent compounds may be used. However, Itoh teaches a process from producing a plastic lenses composition wherein the UV absorbent compound comprising an anthrocenedione compound of formula 1 or 2 (abstract) is added to the composition (abstract). Said compound read on formula 2 of claim 14. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to add the anthrocenedione additive taught in Itoh to the composition of Liao in order to enhance the UV absorbance and clarity of said composition. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/30/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Art-related Rejection With respect to the rejection of claims 10-15 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2020/0239744 ("Liao"), applicant argues the rejection should be withdrawn because the Office Action has not met the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case of unpatentability with respect to the amended claims. Applicant notes the Office Action finds that Liao teaches a release agent composition comprising: 2,4-dihydroxydibenzophenone, a compound that has a structure for absorbing the light and contains at least one hydroxy group [0020], [0064]-[0066]; and polydimethylsiloxane, an organosiloxane polymer [0057]-[0059]. Applicant argues said findings are not germane to the claimed features as amended (particularly, in view of 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone now being excluded from the scope of the amended claims). Said argument is noted but is moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US2014/0349125 teaches a photocurable polysiloxane release composition. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN R KRUER whose telephone number is (571)272-1510. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Callie Shosho can be reached at (571) 272-1123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN R KRUER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1787
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 30, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12550643
NOVEL OXIDANTS AND STRAINED-RING PRECURSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12546012
Zn-PLATED HOT STAMPED PRODUCT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12528977
Magnetic Adhesive for Use on Skin
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12503630
ORGANOPOLYSILOXANE COMPOSITION HAVING PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE LAYER FORMATION PROPERTIES, AND USE OF SAID COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12473460
CROSSLINKED POLYOLEFIN RESIN FOAM, ADHESIVE TAPE, LAYERED BODY, MOLDING, AND DISPLAY MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
27%
Grant Probability
56%
With Interview (+29.6%)
4y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 798 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month