Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/285,505

STEEL SHEET FOR HOT STAMPING AND HOT-STAMPING FORMED BODY

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Priority
May 13, 2021 — JP 2021-081621 +1 more
Examiner
MCGUTHRY BANKS, TIMA MICHELE
Art Unit
1733
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
NIPPON STEEL Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
955 granted / 1170 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
1231
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.4%
+12.4% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1170 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims The status of the claims is unchanged from the filing on 10/04/2023. Claims 1 and 3 are as originally filed, Claims 2, 4, and 5 are currently amended, and Claims 6 and 7 are new. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2019/093384 A1 based on the machine translation. WO 2019/093384 A1 (WO ‘384) is applied as discussed in the office action mailed 12/23/2025. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 2, and 7 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the reasons are applied as discussed in the office action mailed 12/23/2025. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/18/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues WO ‘384 does not teach or suggest the features of an average grain size of prior austenite grains is 5 to 25 μm as recited in Claim 3 and an area ratio of the prior austenite grains having an average grain size of 0.5 to 3.0 μm is 60% or less as recited in Claim 5. Regarding Claim 3, applicant contends that WO ‘384 neither discloses nor suggests manufacturing method described in the specification. The manufacturing conditions are not claimed, and applicant does not address the average grain size of 8 μm of the prior austenite grains taught by WO ‘384 on page 7 of the machine translation. Applicant refers to [0062] from the specification to support the argument that the standard deviation of the prior austenite grain sizes is fundamentally different from the standard deviation described in the office action mailed 12/23/2025. Both [0062] and [0063] describe obtaining the crystal orientation of the prior austenite grains is not particularly limited. Claim 3 as currently recited does not limit the method by which the grains sizes are determined. The calculation of the standard deviation is calculated by excluding the minimum value and maximum value of the prior austenite grain sizes [0064]. Regarding Claim 5, the range of 60% or less reads on zero. WO ‘384 does not need to teach or suggest a range of greater than 0% and 60% or less. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tima M. McGuthry-Banks whose telephone number is (571)272-2744. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 7:30 am to 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith D. Hendricks can be reached at (571) 272-1401. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Tima M. McGuthry-Banks Primary Examiner Art Unit 1733 /TIMA M. MCGUTHRY-BANKS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 18, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676351
METHOD FOR RECOVERING VALUABLE MATERIALS FROM BATTERIES
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669286
Tapered Phase Change Crucible System for the Separation of Rare Earth Elements
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662717
METHOD FOR RECYCLING SILVER FROM WASTE IC CHIPS USING SOLUBLE STARCH
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662722
BATTERY TRAY BOTTOM FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12646642
NANOCRYSTALLINE SOFT MAGNETIC ALLOY WITH HIGH MAGNETIC INDUCTION AND HIGH FREQUENCY AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+2.2%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1170 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month