Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/285,830

MULTILAYER STRUCTURE FOR TRANSPORTING OR STORING HYDROGEN

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 05, 2023
Priority
Apr 07, 2021 — FR FR2103534 +1 more
Examiner
THOMPSON, CAMIE S
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Arkema France
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
967 granted / 1319 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1373
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
63.5%
+23.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1319 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s response and accompanying remarks filed December 9, 2025 are acknowledged. Examiner acknowledges withdrawn claims 21-23. The rejection of claims 1-20 and 24-25 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Savart et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2021/0086403 is withdrawn due to Applicant’s arguments. The rejection of claims 1-20 and 24-25 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hochstetter et al., WO 2021/019181 is withdrawn due to Applicant’s arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 and 24-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hochstetter et al., WO 2021/019181 in view of Savart et al., U.S. Pre Grant Publication 2021/0086403. Regarding claims 1-9, 12 and 25, Hochstetter discloses in paragraphs 0002 and 0005 a multilayer structure for transport or storage of hydrogen. Paragraph 0032 discloses a multilayer structure chosen from a tank, a pipe or tube intended for transport or storage of hydrogen comprising from the inside to the outside , at least one sealing layer and at least one composite reinforcement layer with innermost composite reinforcing layer being welded to the outer sealing layer. Paragraph 0034 discloses that the scaling layer made of a composition comprising at least one semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer [polymer P1] having a melting point as measured according to ISO-11357-3:2013 being less than 280 °C. Paragraph 0035 discloses that the composite reinforcement layer is formed of a fibrous material in the form of continuous fibers impregnated with a composition comprising at least one thermoplastic polymer[polymer P2], particularly a semi-crystalline polymer having Tg higher than 100 °C. Paragraph 0042 discloses that the sealing layer(s) are the innermost layers compared to the composite reinforcing layers which are the outermost layers. Example 5 [0203] a hydrogen storage tank composed of a 11/BACT/10T composite reinforcement of CT24-5.0/270-1-T140 carbon fibers and a PA11 sealing layer. Paragraph 0161 discloses that polymer P1 can include long chain aliphatic polyamides such as PA11, PA1012, PA1212. Paragraph 0082 discloses one or more composite layers. Hochstetter is silent to the claimed multilayer structure as Hochstetter does not disclose that the sealing layer is an outermost layer and the thickness of the outer sealing layer exhibits a thickness of at least 5 µm. Savart teaches N individual tapes of fibrous material in the form of continuous fibers impregnated with at least one thermoplastic polymer [abstract and 0001] with N being between 2 and 2000 and the average thickness of each individual tape being less than or equal to 150 µm [0025 and 0089]. It is disclosed in paragraph 0079 of Savart that the composite has a porosity of less than 2% which can include 0%. Paragraph 0089 discloses the total number of tapes N is between 2 to 2000. Paragraph 0092 discloses that at least one of the tapes includes carbon fibers and at least one of tapes include glass fiber fibrous material. Paragraph 0203 discloses that the thermoplastic polymer is an amorphous polymer whose glass transition temperature is such that Tg≥80° C., in particular ≥100° C., particularly ≥120° C., in particular ≥140° C., or a semicrystalline polymer whose melting temperature Tm≥150° C. Paragraph 0207 discloses that the polyamide can include PA6, PA11, PA12. Savart discloses in paragraph 0134 that the multilayer structure relates to fields of transportation, in particular oil and gas and gas storage. Paragraph 0119 of Savart discloses a fiber volume content of 45 to 65% by volume. Examiner is corresponding one of the layers as Applicant's sealing layer and an adjacent layer as Applicant's composite reinforcing layer. Hochstetter and Savart are analogous art in that both references disclose a multilayer structure utilized in gas storage. Savart discloses in paragraph 0005 discloses that the multilayer composite possess properties of good mechanical and thermal strength. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention would utilize the multilayer structure of Savart as the multilayer tank structure of Hochstetter for the benefit of obtaining a tank having enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Regarding claim 10, Hochstetter discloses in paragraphs 0055-0058 polymer PI has a number average molecular weight ranging from 10,000 to 40,000 g/mol. Regarding claim 11, the claim is directed to the tank having a multilayered structure not the multilayered structure and the gas. Hochstetter discloses a tank multilayered structure. Regarding claims 13-15, paragraphs 0055-0065 of Hochstetter discloses that polymer P1 can include polyamides. Regarding claim 16, paragraphs 0055-0065 of Hochstetter discloses that polymer P1 can include aliphatic polyamides. Regarding claim 17, Example 5 [0203] discloses that the sealing layer can include PA11[polymer P1]. Example 3 [0198] discloses PA 6 as the scaling layer. Regarding claim 18, paragraph 0176 of Hochstetter discloses carbon fibers. Regarding claim 19, paragraph 0171 of Hochstetter discloses a protective layer on the structure which is the outermost layer on the structure. Regarding claim 20, Example 5 of Hochstetler discloses carbon fibers [0203]. See also paragraph 0176. Regarding claim 24, paragraph 0082 discloses one or more composite layers. Paragraph 0142 discloses two, three, four, five ,six, seven eight ,nine or ten composite layers. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the present claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Both Savart and Hochstetter, each alone, have been withdrawn due to Applicant’s arguments. Hochstetter and Savart have now been combined to reject the present claims. Hochstetter is directed to a tank having a multilayer structure. Savart incudes all the limitations of the multilayer structure as claimed. Savart does not teach a tank, pipe or tube having the multilayer structure. Savart does teach that the multilayer structure can be used in applications relating to transportation of oil and gas as well as gas storage. Hochstetter and Savart are analogous art in that both references are directed to a multilayer structure utilized in applications relating to transportation of oil and gas as well as gas storage. Savart discloses that the multilayer structure has good mechanical and thermal properties. The combination is not without motivation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAMIE S THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1530. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd, can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAMIE S THOMPSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 09, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635468
HOLDING TOOL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630474
FORMALDEHYDE-FREE BINDER COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE BINDERS UNDER CONTROLLED ACIDIC CONDITIONS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623948
OPTICAL FIBER GLASS PREFORM AND METHOD FOR DRAWING OPTICAL FIBER GLASS PREFORM
4y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624166
FILMS FOR MULTIPLE LAYERS ASSEMBLIES
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616274
TEXTILES AND ARTICLES AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+10.5%)
3y 5m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1319 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month