Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
DETAILED ACTION
All the references cited in the International Search Report have been considered. None is anticipatory to the elected species. The most pertinent of these references have been applied below.
Claim Objections
Claim(s) 4 is/are objected to because of the following informalities: the structures are almost illegible, and claim 1 has been recited twice. Appropriate correction is required.
Election/Restrictions
The applicant has elected Species IA (claims 1-5) and:
PNG
media_image1.png
200
400
media_image1.png
Greyscale
without traverse.
This restriction is made FINAL. See previous action for the reasons of applying restriction.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1-5 is (are) rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cai et al. listed on IDS and ISR.
As to claims 1-5, Cai discloses PCEPEP-4 terminated with CH2CH2OH that meets the claimed structures:
PNG
media_image2.png
158
568
media_image2.png
Greyscale
PNG
media_image3.png
75
603
media_image3.png
Greyscale
PNG
media_image4.png
331
612
media_image4.png
Greyscale
.
As to repeating unit of claim 1 and Mw of claim 5, PCEPEP-4 would inherently having a repeating unit ≥2, as evidenced by the acid and hydroxyl value, overlapping with the claimed range and would be expected to yield a Mw overlapping with the claimed range. It has been found that where claimed ranges overlap ranges disclosed by the prior art, a prima facie case of obviousness exists - see MPEP 2144.05 I. In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976); In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 16 USPQ2d 1934 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to have created/selected the claimed compositional elements from the composition disclosed in the Cai since it discloses all applicants' components, values and methods of making.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHANE FANG whose telephone number is (571)270-7378. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Thurs. 8am-6pm. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached on 571.572.1302. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/SHANE FANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Prosecution Insights