Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/285,918

PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING EXCIPIENTS AND METHODS OF REDUCING VISCOSITY AND INCREASING STABILITY OF BIOLOGIC FORMULATIONS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 06, 2023
Examiner
TRUONG, QUANGLONG N
Art Unit
1615
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Avantor Performance Materials, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
495 granted / 626 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
675
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
52.4%
+12.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 626 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Status of Application The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are included in the prosecution. Claim Rejections – 35 U.S.C. 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sloey at el. (US20180237501A1) hereinafter Sloey. Regarding claims 1-20, Sloey is drawn to formulations of PCSK9-binding polypeptides that comprise N-acetyl arginine and have reduced viscosities when compared to formulations lacking N-acetyl arginine. Provided herein are also methods of formulating such compositions that are advantageous in that they conserve certain components. Such formulations comprising PCSK9-binding polypeptides can be administered to patients to treat and/or prevent PCSK9-related diseases, conditions, and disorders (abstract). Sloey discloses there is a need in the art to reduce the viscosity of evolocumab- and other PCSK9-binding polypeptides-containing formulations with compounds that are more efficient than arginine [0007]. Sloey discloses a pharmaceutical composition comprising a PCSK9-binding polypeptide that selected from a monoclonal antibody [0009] and N-acetyl arginine [0021]. Sloey discloses pharmaceutical formulations include liquid, e.g., aqueous, solutions that can be directly administered, and lyophilized powders which can be reconstituted into solutions by adding a diluent before administration [0329]. Sloey discloses a derivative of arginine, N-acetyl arginine (NAR), efficiently reduces the viscosity of pharmaceutical compositions comprising high concentrations (greater than 100 mg/mL, such as 140 mg/mL and greater) of evolocumab more so than unacetylated arginine [0273]. Sloey discloses a method of preparing a PCSK9-binding polypeptide pharmaceutical composition comprising at least 140 mg/mL of PCSK9-binding polypeptide, comprising adding to a pharmaceutical composition comprising the PCSK9-binding polypeptide an effective amount of N-acetyl arginine, such that the viscosity of the pharmaceutical composition is reduced when compared to the pharmaceutical composition lacking the N-acetyl arginine [0137]. Sloey does not explicitly disclose each of the components of the composition in a single embodiment. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Sloey, to arrive at the instant invention. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do so because Sloey discloses all the required components and Sloey discloses N-acetyl arginine, efficiently reduces the viscosity of pharmaceutical compositions comprising high concentrations of evolocumab more so than unacetylated arginine [0273]. Further, one having ordinary still in the art would reasonably expect success in combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results, see MPEP 2141. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUANGLONG N TRUONG whose telephone number is (571)270-0719. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00 am-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert A Wax can be reached on 571-272-0623. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUANGLONG N TRUONG/Examiner, Art Unit 1615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 06, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12551418
COSMETIC COTAINING ULTRAVIOLET WAVELENGTH CONVERTING SUBSTANCE AND MEDICINAL AGENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12539322
USE OF MULBERRY EXTRACT FOR CONTROLLING POSTPRANDIAL GLUCOSE RESPONSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12533309
Minoxidil Adjuvant Therapies
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12533321
POLYPEPTIDE FORMULATIONS FOR ORAL DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12527729
MINOXIDIL ADJUVANT THERAPIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 626 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month