Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/286,084

A LASER RECEIVING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 06, 2023
Priority
Apr 09, 2021 — CN 202120725023.4 +1 more
Examiner
BENNETT, GEORGE B
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Changzhou Huada Kejie Opto-Electro Instrument Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
433 granted / 544 resolved
+11.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
553
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
54.4%
+14.4% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 544 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Crozier et al. (US Pub. No. 2016/0054114). Regarding claim 1, Crozier et al. discloses laser receiving device 11 which includes: a photoelectric sensor 20 and a display 32 connected to a main control board 26; where in the laser receiving device 11 further comprises a laser ranging module 50; and the laser ranging module 50 is connected with the main control board 26. Regarding claim 2, Crozier et al. may include at least two photoelectric sensing units in the arrangement as claimed (see claim 2 of Crozier et al.). Regarding claim 3, Crozier et al. discloses an angle sensor 40 connected to the main control board. Regarding claim 5, Crozier et al. discloses an audio playing module 34 connected to the main control board. Regarding claim 7, Crozier et al. discloses a housing (10, 11 in FIGS 9 and 10, for example) for the electronic components. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4, 6 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Crozier et al. Crozier et al. discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Crozier et al. does not disclose a Bluetooth module, a battery or the specific button operation as claimed. Crozier does teach both wireless communication and button operation for user functions (see [0048]). Additionally, the Crozier et al. device requires a power source to operate, such as a battery. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use a Bluetooth module, a battery and/or the specific button operation as claimed with the device of Crozier et al. based on manufacturer and/or user preferences. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to G. BRADLEY BENNETT whose telephone number is 571.272.2237. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH, 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571.272.2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571.273.8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800.786.9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571.272.1000. /GEORGE B BENNETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 gbb 28 NOV 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 06, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638284
Difference Maker Tape Measure and Method of Use
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631436
TRAVELING VEHICLE SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624945
SURVEYING TARGET AND METHOD WITH LIGHT SECTOR POWER OPTIMIZATION
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618666
ANTENNA ALIGNMENT APPARATUS
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12613094
LASER POCKET LEVEL MULTI-AXIS MICRO ADJUST
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 544 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month