Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/286,452

DYNAMIC BANDWIDTH CAPACITY EXPANSION METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §101§102§103
Filed
Oct 11, 2023
Examiner
HAILU, KIBROM T
Art Unit
2461
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Spreadtrum Communications (Shanghai) Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
39%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

80%
Career Allow Rate
675 granted / 845 resolved
Without
With
+-41.2%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 pending
885
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§101 §102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 14, and 24-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claims are directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claims recite, “A non-volatile or non-transitory computer-readable storage medium”. However, the claims do not exclude non-statutory subject matter. That is, the computer-readable storage medium is not strictly non-transitory (statutory subject matter) because it is claimed in an alternate way. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 14-16, 20, 24, and 26-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Merlin et al. (US 2018/0205502 A1). Regarding claim 14, Merlin discloses a non-volatile or non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing one or more programs, the one or more programs comprising computer instructions, which, when executed by a processor (paragraph [0011]-[0012]; [0029]-[0030]; [0116]; [0142]-[0145]; and so on), cause the processor to: establish a dynamic bandwidth expansion element, wherein the dynamic bandwidth expansion element comprises at least two different network links (Link 1, Link 2, and Link 3) (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on, explaining signaling or establishing dynamic bandwidth control (e.g. expansion) including plurality of links); and configure an external interface for the dynamic bandwidth expansion element (figs. 3-5, illustrating configuring external interfaces such as PHY for the dynamic bandwidth expansion). Regarding claim 15, Merlin discloses an electronic device, comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores one or more programs, the one or more programs comprising computer instructions, which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: establish a dynamic bandwidth expansion element, wherein the dynamic bandwidth expansion element comprises at least two different network links (Link 1, Link 2, and Link 3) (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on); and configure an external interface for the dynamic bandwidth expansion element (figs. 3-5). Regarding claim 16, Merlin discloses wherein the processor is further caused to: establish the dynamic bandwidth expansion element on a device with a multi-link aggregation function (figs. 3-5; [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on). Regarding claim 20, Merlin discloses wherein the processor is further caused to: enable a wireless connection interface of the device with the multi-link aggregation function (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on). Regarding claim 24, Merlin discloses wherein the processor is further caused to: establish the dynamic bandwidth expansion element on a device with a multi-link aggregation function (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on). Regarding claim 26, Merlin discloses wherein the processor is further caused to: connect the device with the multi-link aggregation function to a network through the at least two different network links respectively (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on); and enable an aggregation and forwarding function of the device (figs. 3-5). Regarding claim 27, Merlin discloses wherein the processor is further caused to: connect the device with the multi-link aggregation function to a network through the at least two different network links respectively (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on); and enable an aggregation and forwarding function of the device (figs. 3-5). Regarding claim 28, Merlin discloses wherein the processor is further caused to: enable a wireless connection interface of the device with the multi-link aggregation function (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-5, 17-19, 21-23, and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Merlin in view of Zhu et al. (US 2024/0259857 A1). Regarding claim 1, Merlin discloses a dynamic bandwidth expansion method (paragraph [0078]), comprising: establishing a dynamic bandwidth expansion element, wherein the dynamic bandwidth expansion element comprises at least two different network links (Link 1, Link 2, and Link 3) (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on); configuring an external interface for the dynamic bandwidth expansion element (figs. 3-5). Merlin doesn’t disclose connecting with the external interface and communicating with a server through the at least two different network links. Zhu teaches connecting with the external interface and communicating with a server through the at least two different network links (fig. 1-3; and etc.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use connecting with the external interface and communicating with a server through the at least two different network links as taught by Zhu into Merlin in order to improve efficiency and resource utilization. Regarding claim 2, Merlin discloses wherein said establishing the dynamic bandwidth expansion element comprises: establishing the dynamic bandwidth expansion element on a device with a multi-link aggregation function (figs. 3-5; [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on). Regarding claim 3, Merlin discloses wherein the device with the multi-link aggregation function, and the at least two different network links (e.g. figs. 3-5). Merlin doesn’t disclose comprises a smartphone or a Customer Premise Equipment (CPE); and the at least two different network links comprise two or more selected from a group consisting of a 4G network link, a 5G network link, and a Wi-Fi network link. Zhu teaches comprises a smartphone or a Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) (e.g. paragraph [0246]); and the at least two different network links comprise two or more selected from a group consisting of a 4G network link, a 5G network link, and a Wi-Fi network link (paragraph [0253]; [0267]; [0323]; [0341]; [0179]; [0183]; and so on). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use comprises a smartphone or a Customer Premise Equipment (CPE); and the at least two different network links comprise two or more selected from a group consisting of a 4G network link, a 5G network link, and a Wi-Fi network link as taught by Zhu into Merlin in order to improve efficiency and resource utilization, and to reduce delay. Regarding claim 4, Merlin discloses wherein said establishing the dynamic bandwidth expansion element on the device with the multi-link aggregation function comprises: connecting the device with the multi-link aggregation function to a network through the at least two different network links respectively (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on); and enabling an aggregation and forwarding function of the device (figs. 3-5). Regarding claim 5, Merlin discloses wherein said configuring the external interface for the dynamic bandwidth expansion element comprises: enabling a wireless connection interface of the device with the multi-link aggregation function (figs. 3-5). Regarding claim 17, Merlin discloses wherein the device with the multi-link aggregation function, and the at least two different network links (e.g. figs. 3-5). Merlin doesn’t disclose comprises a smartphone or a Customer Premise Equipment (CPE); and the at least two different network links comprise two or more selected from a group consisting of a 4G network link, a 5G network link, and a Wi-Fi network link. Zhu teaches comprises a smartphone or a Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) (e.g. paragraph [0246]); and the at least two different network links comprise two or more selected from a group consisting of a 4G network link, a 5G network link, and a Wi-Fi network link (paragraph [0253]; [0267]; [0323]; [0341]; [0179]; [0183]; and so on). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use comprises a smartphone or a Customer Premise Equipment (CPE); and the at least two different network links comprise two or more selected from a group consisting of a 4G network link, a 5G network link, and a Wi-Fi network link as taught by Zhu into Merlin in order to improve efficiency and resource utilization, and to reduce delay. Regarding claim 18, Merlin discloses wherein the processor is further caused to: connect the device with the multi-link aggregation function to a network through the at least two different network links respectively (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on); and enable an aggregation and forwarding function of the device (figs. 3-5). Regarding claim 19, Merlin discloses wherein the processor is further caused to: connect the device with the multi-link aggregation function to a network through the at least two different network links respectively (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on); and enable an aggregation and forwarding function of the device (figs. 3-5). Regarding claim 21, Merlin discloses wherein the processor is further caused to: enable a wireless connection interface of the device with the multi-link aggregation function (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on). Regarding claim 22, Merlin discloses wherein said establishing the dynamic bandwidth expansion element on the device with the multi-link aggregation function comprises: connecting the device with the multi-link aggregation function to a network through the at least two different network links respectively (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on); and enabling an aggregation and forwarding function of the device (figs. 3-5). Regarding claim 23, Merlin discloses wherein said configuring the external interface for the dynamic bandwidth expansion element comprises: enabling a wireless connection interface of the device with the multi-link aggregation function (figs. 3-5; paragraph [0078]; [0084]; [0090]; and so on). Regarding claim 25, Merlin discloses wherein the device with the multi-link aggregation function, and the at least two different network links (e.g. figs. 3-5). Merlin doesn’t disclose comprises a smartphone or a Customer Premise Equipment (CPE); and the at least two different network links comprise two or more selected from a group consisting of a 4G network link, a 5G network link, and a Wi-Fi network link. Zhu teaches comprises a smartphone or a Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) (e.g. paragraph [0246]); and the at least two different network links comprise two or more selected from a group consisting of a 4G network link, a 5G network link, and a Wi-Fi network link (paragraph [0253]; [0267]; [0323]; [0341]; [0179]; [0183]; and so on). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use comprises a smartphone or a Customer Premise Equipment (CPE); and the at least two different network links comprise two or more selected from a group consisting of a 4G network link, a 5G network link, and a Wi-Fi network link as taught by Zhu into Merlin in order to improve efficiency and resource utilization, and to reduce delay. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIBROM T HAILU whose telephone number is (571)270-1209. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, HUY D VU can be reached at (571)272-3155. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIBROM T HAILU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2461
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102, §103
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12592987
PATH VISIBILITY, PACKET DROP, AND LATENCY MEASUREMENT WITH SERVICE CHAINING DATA FLOWS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581552
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RELAY COMMUNICATION IN SIDELINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574898
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND TERMINAL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568516
Flexible Aperiodic SRS Triggering in a Cellular Communication System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562959
Entities and Methods for Automatic Configuration and Selection of Analytics Network Function Instances in 5G Networks
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
39%
With Interview (-41.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 845 resolved cases by this examiner