Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/286,992

DUAL CONNECTIVITY MOBILITY MANAGEMENT WITH L2 UE-TO-NETWORK RELAY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 13, 2023
Examiner
YUEN, KAN
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
738 granted / 833 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
860
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 833 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Restriction Applicant’s Restriction arguments, see applicant’s remark, filed on 12/10/2025, with respect to claims 1-30 have been acknowledged. The applicant elects, without traverse, Group I, claims 1-15. Claim Objections Claim 15 is objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 15, line 1, the term “The method of claim 1” should be changed to “The method of claim 10”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4, 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 4, the term “the RRC reestablishment request message” has no antecedent basis. The same issue exists in claim 13. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 5-12, 14, 15 are allowed. The prior art of record fails to disclose the features to transmit, to at least one of a source master network entity or a target master network entity, an indication of a first entity change from the source master network entity to the target master network entity and a second entity change from a source secondary network entity to a target secondary network entity, the remote UE being connected to the source master network entity through a first relayed link via a first relay UE before the first entity change; …transmit, to the target master network entity during the RRC reestablishment procedure, one or more measurements corresponding to the second entity change; receive, from the target master network entity, a dual connectivity configuration based on the transmitted one or more measurements, the dual connectivity configuration corresponding to the first entity change and the second entity change, the remote UE being connected to the target master network entity through a second relayed link via a second relay UE after the first entity change; and communicate with the target master network entity and the target secondary network entity based on the dual connectivity configuration, as recited in claim 1 and similarly recited in claim 10. Claims 4, 13 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim et al. (Pub No.: 2022/0053390) discloses a method and apparatus for supporting of inter-gNB handover in higher layer multi-connectivity is provided. A target master node (MN) of an inter-MN handover procedure receives a handover request message including information on a redundancy sequence number (RSN) from a source MN of the inter-MN handover procedure. The information on the RSN informs that a protocol data unit (PDU) session mapped to the RSN is allocated to a secondary node (SN) of the inter-MN handover procedure for redundant transmission. Selvaganapathy et al. (Pub No.: 2023/0379771) discloses an apparatus comprising means for controlling execution of a plurality of conditional mobility procedures, the conditional mobility procedures comprising a first conditional mobility procedure comprising a first configuration initiated by a first network node, and a second conditional mobility procedure comprising a second configuration initiated by a second network node, wherein controlling execution of the plurality of conditional mobility procedures comprises controlling sequential execution of the first and second conditional mobility procedures based on the first configuration and the second configuration. Zhang et al. (Pub No.: 2019/0253939) discloses a UE (10) provides information on potential S′eNB(s). The information is forwarded from an MeNB (20_1) to an M′eNB (20_2) such that the M′eNB (20_2) can determine, before the handover happens, whether the M′eNB (20_2) will configure a new SeNB (S′eNB) and which S′eNB the M′eNB (20_2) will configure. In one of options, the MeNB (20_1) derives a key S′-KeNB for communication protection between the UE (10) and the S′eNB (30_1), and send the S′-KeNB to the M′eNB (20_2). In another option, the M′eNB (20_2) derives the S′-KeNB from a key KeNB* received from the MeNB (20_1). The M′eNB (20_2) sends the S′-KeNB to the S′eNB (30_1). Moreover, there are also provided several variations to perform SeNB Release, SeNB Addition, Bearer Modification and the like, in which the order and/or timing thereof can be different during the handover procedure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAN YUEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1413. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10:30am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at 571-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAN YUEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 13, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604235
WIRELESS NETWORK LOAD BALANCING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592765
Software-Defined Filtering in a Repeater
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593246
PREDICTIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED WIRELESS STATION LOAD BALANCING BASED ON ACCESS POINT UPLINK UTILIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587907
Handover method and apparatus, and information transmitting method and apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587927
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONDITIONAL RECONFIGURATION IN INTEGRATED ACCESS AND BACKHAUL (IAB)
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 833 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month