Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/287,143

TREATMENT FOR VIRAL INFECTION WITH POLYENE MACROLIDE ANTIBIOTIC

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 16, 2023
Priority
Apr 16, 2021 — HU P2100156 +2 more
Examiner
LEWIS, PATRICK T
Art Unit
1691
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Pannonpharma Gyógyszergyártó Kft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
851 granted / 1146 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1176
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1146 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2 and 4-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 2 and 4-9, the term and/or phrase "preferably", “including”, “very preferably”, “in particular”, and/or “more preferably” render(s) the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the term and/or phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 5-6, and 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Riad A, Gomaa E, Hockova B, Klugar M. Oral candidiasis of COVID‐19 patients: Case report and review of evidence. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2021 Mar 21;20(6):1580 (Riad). Riad teaches a method comprising orally administering nystatin to a human patient having SARS-CoV-2 (page 1583). PNG media_image1.png 854 1062 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding the clause “wherein SARS-CoV-2 virus…beginning of the treatment” or ”wherein replicable SARS-CoV-2 virus…sample of the subject”, claim scope is not limited by claim language that suggests or makes optional but does not require steps to be performed, or by claim language that does not limit a claim to a particular structure. See MPEP 2111.04. Riad teaches all of the instantly claimed elements. Thus, claims 1-2, 5-6, and 10-11 are anticipated. Conclusion Claims 1-11 are pending. Claims 1-2 and 4-11 are rejected. Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. No claims are allowed. Contacts Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK T LEWIS whose telephone number is (571)272-0655. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 10 AM to 4 PM EST (Maxi Flex). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Claytor can be reached at (571) 272-8394. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK T LEWIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1691 /PL/
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636305
COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF APPLYING SAME TO INCREASE SURVIVAL OF FISH FOLLOWING CATCH-AND-RELEASE SITUATIONS
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629387
COMPOSITION OF ANTIVIRAL AGENT FOR USE IN PROPHYLACTIC OR POST-EXPOSURE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS OR RESPIRATORY DISEASES
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12616778
COMPOSITE ULTRATHIN COATING FILM WITH INHIBITORY ACTIVITY AGAINST HYPERINFLAMMATORY RESPONSE AND BACTERIA, IMPLANT INCLUDING SAME, AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12606589
BRIDGED NUCLEOSIDE AND NUCLEOTIDE USING SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12605397
DEOXY-CYTIDINE OR URIDINE DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN CANCER THERAPIES
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1146 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month