Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/287,346

METHOD FOR CULTURING DENDRITIC CELLS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Priority
May 07, 2021 — RE 102021-0059019 +2 more
Examiner
DUFFY, BRADLEY
Art Unit
1643
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Nanofaentech Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
410 granted / 754 resolved
-5.6% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+46.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
807
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 754 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detailed Action The election without traverse filed July 20, 2026, is acknowledged and has been entered. Applicant has elected Group I. Applicant has further elected a species of LPS and the combination of the three amino acid sequences of Arg-Gly-Asp, Leu-Asp-Val, and SEQ ID NO: 3. The amendment filed July 20, 2026, is acknowledged and has been entered. Claims 23 and 25 have been canceled. Claims 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 24 and 26 have been amended. Claims 12-22, 24 and 26-31 are pending. Claims 16-22 are withdrawn from further consideration, as being drawn to non-elected invention. Claims 12-15, 24 and 26-31 are under consideration. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements have been considered. With respect to the information disclosure statements filed July 20, 2026, these information disclosure statements duplicate previous information disclosure statements so they have been crossed out. Claim Objections Claims 12 and 15 are objected to for reciting “preparing isolating”. It appears the claims should recite “preparing isolated”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless -- (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 12-15, 24, 26 and 30-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Katayama et al (WO 2014/136845 A1) as evidenced by Exhibit A (translation of WO 2014/136845 A1) and as evidenced by US Patent 8,927,273. With respect to claims 12-15 and 26, Katayama et al discloses methods comprising steps of preparing isolated dendritic cells, treating the isolated dendritic cells with a fibronectin peptide fragment comprising cell adhesion domains, such as CH-296 in a culture and then activating the dendritic cells with LPS and culturing the treated dendritic cells with T cells (immune cells) (see entire translation, e.g., pages 1-5). As evidenced by US Patent 8,927,273, CH-296 has the sequence of SEQ ID NO:13 from 8,927,273 (see sequence below) which comprises PHSRN, RGD and LDV and is at least 11 amino acids where the sequences are linked by amino acids that link the three sequences (linked by a linker). With respect to claims 30-31, Katayama et al discloses that the fibronectin peptide fragment at a concentration of 200 µg/ml or more in the methods (see page 4, e.g., 500 µg/ml) and that the dendritic cells are derived from monocytes (see pages 3 and 5). CH-296 from WO2014136845A1 and SEQ ID NO:13 from 8,927,273 PTDLRFTNIGPDTMRVTWAPPPSIDLTNFLVRYSPVKNEEDVAELSISPSDNAVVLTNLL PGTEYVVSVSSVYEQHESTPLRGRQKTGLDSPTGIDFSDITANSFTVHWIAPRATITGYR IRHHPEHFSGRPREDRVPHSRNSITLTNLTPGTEYVVSIVALNGREESPLLIGQQSTVSD VPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAPAVTVRYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGSKSTATISGLK PGVDYTITVYAVTGRGDSPASSKPISINYRTEIDKPSMAIPAPTDLKFTQVTPTSLSAQW TPPNVQLTGYRVRVTPKEKTGPMKEINLAPDSSSVVVSGLMVATKYEVSVYALKDTLTSR PAQGVVTTLENVSPPRRARVTDATETTITISWRTKTETITGFQVDAVPANGQTPIQRTIK PDVRSYTITGLQPGTDYKIYLYTLNDNARSSPVVIDASTAIDAPSNLRFLATTPNSLLVS WQPPRARITGYIIKYEKPGSPPREVVPRPRPGVTEATITGLEPGTEYTIYVIALKNNQKS EPLIGRKKTDELPQLVTLPHPNLHGPEILDVPST Therefore, Katayama et al is deemed to anticipate the instant claims absent a showing otherwise. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 12-15, 24, 26-28 and 30-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Katayama et al (WO 2014/136845 A1) as evidenced by Exhibit A (translation of WO 2014/136845 A1) and as evidenced by US Patent 8,927,273, Mardilovich et al (Langmuir, 22(7):3259-3264, 2006, IDS) and Akiyama et al (Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 14:173-189, 1995). With respect to claims 12-15 and 26, Katayama et al discloses methods comprising steps of preparing isolated dendritic cells, treating the isolated dendritic cells with a fibronectin peptide fragment comprising fibronectin cell adhesion domains, such as CH-296 in a culture and then activating the dendritic cells with LPS and culturing the treated dendritic cells with T cells (immune cells) (see entire translation, e.g., pages 1-5). As evidenced by US Patent 8,927,273, CH-296 has the sequence of SEQ ID NO:13 from 8,927,273 (see sequence above) which comprises PHSRN, RGD and LDV and is at least 11 amino acids where the sequences are linked by amino acids that link the three sequences (linked by a linker). With respect to claims 30-31, Katayama et al discloses that the fibronectin peptide fragment at a concentration of 200 µg/ml or more in the methods (see page 4, e.g., 500 µg/ml) and that the dendritic cells are derived from monocytes (see pages 3 and 5). Mardilovich et al discloses fibronectin mimetic peptides comprising PHSRN and RGD, linked by a linker wherein the linker consists of glycine and serine that has a length of 8 aa and methods of chemically synthesizing them (see abstract and Table 1). Akiyama et al discloses fibronectin cell adhesion regions (domains) comprising PHSRN, RGD and LDV (see abstract). Accordingly, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to link fibronectin cell adhesion regions (domains) comprising PHSRN, RGD and LDV with a linker consisting of glycine and serine that has a length of 8 aa and use them in the methods of Katayama et al because these three peptide sequences are disclosed as fibronectin cell adhesion regions which would be expected to work in the methods of Katayama et al which discloses using cell adhesion domains as fibronectin mimetics in their methods. Notably, smaller peptides comprising PHSRN, RGD and LDV with a linker consisting of glycine and serine that has a length of 8 aa would have the advantage over the CH-296 peptide comprising PHSRN, RGD and LDV of Katayama et al because the smaller peptide could be chemically synthesized or recombinantly produced and the smaller size would be expected to be facilitate production. Furthermore, one of skill in the art would see such a combination as simple substitution of one known element (the CH-296 peptide comprising PHSRN, RGD and LDV) for another (fibronectin cell adhesion regions (domains) comprising PHSRN, RGD and LDV linked with a linker consisting of glycine and serine that has a length of 8 aa) to yield predictable results and combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results because these peptide domains are known cell adhesion regions that are used in fibronectin mimetics. Accordingly, the invention as a whole was prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made, as evidenced by the references. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Claim 29 is objected to for depending from a rejected base claim. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brad Duffy whose telephone number is (571) 272-9935. The Examiner works a flexible schedule and can normally be reached Monday through Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Julie Wu can be reached on (571) 272-5205. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Respectfully, Brad Duffy 571-272-9935 /Brad Duffy/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1643 September 30, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767705
Antigen Binding Proteins to Class 5 ETEC Adhesins
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760106
Covalent Diabodies and Uses Thereof
4y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758620
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-2 AND USE THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751973
BISPECIFIC CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTORS TARGETING CD20 AND BCMA
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746268
COMBINATION COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING DISORDERS REQUIRING REMOVAL OR DESTRUCTION OF UNWANTED CELLULAR PROLIFERATIONS
11y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.0%)
3y 8m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 754 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month