Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/287,459

SELF-MOVING CLEANING DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Priority
Apr 19, 2021 — CN 202110417448.3 +1 more
Examiner
RIVERA, CARLOS A
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Beijing Roborock Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
408 granted / 528 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
553
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 528 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 11, 14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 11-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nusser DE 4101489 A1 in view of Fu CN 109199261 A and Shinler US 2002/0170131 A1. Re claims 1, 11, 14, Nusser discloses a device [Fig. 26], comprising a main body 11, a sweeping apparatus 5 and a lifting and lowering apparatus [A], wherein the sweeping apparatus 5 is connected to the main body 11 by means of the lifting and lowering apparatus [A]; the lifting and lowering apparatus comprises a synchronous linkage assembly 2’, a connecting rod mechanism [3, 4], the connecting rod mechanism comprises a first connecting rod 3 and a second connecting rod 4, the first connecting rod 3 and the second connecting rod 4 are rotationally connected to the main body 11 around an axis [a] in a horizontal direction, the first connecting rod 3 is rotationally connected to the second connecting rod 4 by means of the synchronous linkage assembly 2’ along a vertical direction; and wherein a first location where the first connecting rod 3 and the main body 11 are rotationally connected and a second location where the second connecting rod 4 and the main body 11 are rotationally connected are located on the same horizontal plane [fig. 26] perpendicular to the vertical location; controlling the first connecting rod 3 and the second connecting rod 5 to rotate in a first direction, so as to lift the sweeping apparatus along the vertical direction, and in a second direction opposite to a first direction, so as to lower the sweeping apparatus along the vertical location [implied by the four-bar linkage connection]. Nusser does not disclose the cleaning device is a self-moving cleaning device; and controlling a driving portion to drive the first connecting rod to enable the sweeping apparatus to be lifted and lowered relative to the main body. However, Fu teaches the use of a lifting and lowering apparatus for a sweeping apparatus of a self-moving cleaning device. Shinler teaches controlling a driving potion 80 [fig. 5] configured to drive a first and second connecting rods to enable the sweeping apparatus to be lifted and lowered in a vertical direction relative to the main body. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the driving portion of Shinler with the cleaning device of Nusser in a self-moving device, as suggested and taught by Fu, in order to yield the predictable result of a self-moving cleaning device that can lift and lower the brushes when needed. Re claims 12, 15, Nusser further teaches wherein controlling the driving portion to drive the first connecting rod 3 and the second connecting rod 4 to rotate in the first direction, so as to lift the sweeping apparatus 5 comprises: controlling the driving portion to drive the first connecting rod to rotate around a first rotational connection point [hinge of element 3] in the first direction, and driving, by means of the synchronous linkage assembly 2’, the second connecting rod 4 to rotate around a second rotational connection point [hinge of element 4] in the first direction, so as to lift the sweeping apparatus 5. Re claims 13, 16, Nusser further teaches wherein controlling the driving portion 31 to drive the first connecting rod 3 and the second connecting rod 4 to rotate in the first direction, so as to lift the sweeping apparatus comprises: controlling the driving portion to drive a second swing arm 4 of the first connecting rod to rotate around a first rotational connection point [hinge of element 4] in the first direction; driving, by means of the second swing arm, a first swing arm 3 of the first connecting rod to rotate around the first rotational connection point in the first direction; and driving, by means of the synchronous linkage assembly 2’, the second connecting rod 4 to rotate around a second rotational connection point [hinge of element 4] in the first direction, so as to lift the sweeping apparatus 5. Re claim 17, Nusser further teaches wherein during rotation of the first connecting rod 322 and the second connecting rod 34, ends of the first connecting rod and the second connecting rod connected by means of the synchronous linkage assembly 321 are always located on the same horizontal plane (see figs. 2-3]. Claim(s) 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nusser DE 4101489 A1 in view of Fu CN 109199261 A and Shinler US 2002/0170131 A1 and in further view of Cheng CN 110215166 A. Re claim 6, Nusser, Fu, and Shinler teach the invention as discussed above for claim 1 but fail to teach wherein a number of the connecting rod mechanisms is two sets, and the two sets of connecting rod mechanisms are symmetrically arranged on two sides of the synchronous linkage assembly, respectively. Cheng teaches a sweeping apparatus with two sets of two connecting rod mechanisms [Fig. 6], and the two sets of connecting rod mechanisms are symmetrically arranged on two sides of the synchronous linkage assembly 12, respectively [Figs. 5-6]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bian with Nusser since it has been held that duplication of parts has no patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced. MPEP 2144.04 VI B. Re claim 7, Nusser, Fu, Shinler, and Cheng teach the invention as discussed above for claim 6. Cheng further teaches wherein the synchronous linkage assembly 12 comprises a first synchronizing shaft, a second synchronizing shaft, a third synchronizing shaft [shafts between links 13 and 14] and a connector 121, wherein the connector 121 is rotationally connected to the first synchronizing shaft and the second synchronizing shaft; first ends of the first connecting rods of the two sets of connecting rod mechanisms are rotationally connected by means of the first synchronizing shaft, and second ends of first connecting rods of the two sets of connecting rod mechanisms are rotationally connected by means of the second synchronizing shaft; the second connecting rods of the two sets of connecting rod mechanisms are rotationally connected by means of the third synchronizing shaft; and the driving portion is rotationally connected to the first synchronizing shaft [see below]. PNG media_image1.png 544 726 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim(s) 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nusser DE 4101489 A1 in view of Fu CN 109199261 A and Shinler US 2002/0170131 A1 and Cheng CN 110215166 A and in further view of Bian CN 101057766 B. Re claim 8, Nusser, Fu, Shinler, and Cheng teach the invention as discussed above for claim 7 but fail to teach wherein the connecting rod mechanism further comprises a position-limiting portion mounted on the main body, the position- limiting portion is configured to prevent the first connecting rod and the second connecting rod from rotating so as to limit a lowering height of the sweeping apparatus. Bian teaches wherein the connecting rod mechanism further comprises a position-limiting portion 14 [Fig. 4] mounted on the main body, the position- limiting portion is configured to prevent the first connecting rod 322 and the second connecting rod 34 from rotating so as to limit a lowering height of the sweeping apparatus. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the position limiting portion of Bian in the combination of Nusser in order to yield the predictable result of a self-locking when lifting. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 9-10, 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not show or fairly render obvious the combination set forth in the claims. In particular, for claim 3, the prior art does not show wherein the first connecting rod comprises a first swing arm, a bent portion and a second swing arm, the bent portion is respectively connected to a first end of the first swing arm and a first end of the second swing arm, the bent portion is rotationally connected to the main body, the second end of the first swing arm is rotationally connected to the second connecting rod by means of the synchronous linkage assembly, and the second end of the second swing arm is rotationally connected to the driving portion; for claim 9, the prior art does not show wherein the second connecting rod is rotationally connected to a lower portion of the position-limiting portion; and for claim 10, the prior art does not show wherein the synchronous linkage assembly further comprises mounting bases, the mounting bases are arranged at two ends of the second synchronizing shaft and two ends of the third synchronizing shaft, respectively, and the mounting bases are connected to the sweeping apparatus. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Carlos A. Rivera whose telephone number is (571)270-5697. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM -4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Keller can be reached at (571) 272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. C. A. R. Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 3723 /C. A. RIVERA/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 13, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745889
PAD WASHING DOCK FOR MOBILE CLEANING ROBOTS
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749698
BATTERY ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLING METHOD, CLAMP AND WELDING DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746639
POLISHING PAD CONDITIONING APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746648
RATCHET WRENCH INCLUDING A BICYCLE TOOLSET COMBINED THEREWITH CROSS-REFERENCE
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740682
ELECTRIC BURNISHER
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.2%)
3y 4m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 528 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month