Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/287,501

A SAMPLE COLLECTOR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 19, 2023
Examiner
EPPERT, LUCY CLARE
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Imec Vzw
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
36%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 36% of cases
36%
Career Allow Rate
4 granted / 11 resolved
-33.6% vs TC avg
Strong +61% interview lift
Without
With
+60.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
62
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§112
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 11 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 38 is objected to because of the following informalities: “optics of the analysis instrument is configured” should be “optics of the analysis instrument are configured”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 41 is objected to because of the following informalities: The period after “compartment” in line 3 should be a comma. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 34, 41, and 44 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regards to claim 34 it is unclear what is meant by “wherein the sealing members are configured to define a respective sealed volume between the sealing member and a peripheral edge of the particle capturing substrate”. The claim is being interpreted as “wherein each sealing member is configured to define a respective sealed member between the sealing member and a peripheral edge of the particle capturing substrate”. Claim 41 recites the limitation "the intermediate configuration" in line 6. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The claim is being interpreted such that the phrase reads “an intermediate configuration”. Claim 44 contains a step of “reconfiguring the sample collector from the sampling configuration to the reagent filling configuration”. The claim earlier states that the “particle capturing substrate” is what is reconfigured into a sampling configuration, not the sample collector. For purposes of examination the claim is being interpreted as saying “reconfiguring the particle capturing substrate from the sampling configuration to the reagent filling configuration”. Examiner’s Note The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ahmad (US 20190350495 A1) teaches a sample collector for collection of airborne particles exhaled by a human being, comprising: a sampling compartment comprising an inlet for receiving a flow of air ([0124]); and a particle capturing substrate configured to capture the airborne particles in the flow of air ([0124]). Cooper (US 20150377868 A1) teaches a sample collector for collection of airborne particles exhaled by a human being, comprising: a particle capturing substrate configured to capture the airborne particles in the flow of air; an analysis compartment wherein an aperture is defined in a wall of the analysis compartment; and a substrate clamping device comprising an optical window and a support member; wherein the sample collector is reconfigurable between a sampling configuration and an analysis configuration ([0062], [0097], and [0139]). Braig (US 5282473 A) teaches an infrared gas analyzer with aperture (abstract). In regards to claim 25, none of the prior art teaches or suggests, either alone or in combination, a sample collector comprising a substrate clamping device comprising an optical window and a support member; wherein the sample collector is reconfigurable between a sampling configuration and an analysis configuration, wherein: in the analysis configuration the substrate clamping device and a particle capturing substrate are arranged in an analysis compartment, the optical window is aligned with an aperture such that optical access to a particle capturing substrate is allowed, and the substrate clamping device is in a closed state such that the particle capturing substrate is clamped between the optical window and a support member; and wherein, during reconfiguration from a sampling configuration to the analysis configuration, the substrate clamping device and the particle capturing substrate are configured to be moved together to the analysis compartment while the substrate clamping device is brought to the closed state, in combination with the other claimed elements. For this reason, claims 25-33, 35-37, 39-40, and 42-43 are allowable. Claims 38 and 44 contain no prior art rejections, however they are not in condition for allowance due to their objections. Claims 34, 41, and 44 contain no prior art rejections, however they are not in condition for allowance due to their rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUCY EPPERT whose telephone number is (571)270-0818. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Robertson can be reached at (571) 272-5001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUCY EPPERT/Examiner, Art Unit 3791 /ETSUB D BERHANU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12551123
Pulse Diagnosis Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12471788
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR MEASURING BLOOD PRESSURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Patent 12402811
Neuromuscular Testing Device and Method to Use
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 3 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
36%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+60.7%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 11 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month