Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/287,521

STEEL MATERIAL FOR CARBONITRIDING AND CARBONITRIDED STEEL MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 19, 2023
Priority
Apr 20, 2021 — JP 2021-071046 +2 more
Examiner
ROE, JESSEE RANDALL
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Daido Steel Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
981 granted / 1287 resolved
+11.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1333
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
70.0%
+30.0% vs TC avg
§102
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1287 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claims 1-7 are pending and are currently under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hirakami et al. (WO 2020/138450). In regard to claim 1, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses carbonitrided steel components having compositions relative to that of the instant invention as set forth below (abstract and pages 5-6 of Translation). Element Instant Claim (mass percent) Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) (mass percent) Overlap C 0.15 – 0.25 0.15 – 0.45 0.15 – 0.25 Si 0.01 – 0.24 0 – 0.5 0.01 – 0.24 Mn 0.5 – 1.8 0.20 – 0.60 0.5 – 0.60 Cu 0.001 – 0.3 0 – 0.20 0.001 – 0.20 Ni 0.01 – 0.6 0 – 0.20 0.01 – 0.20 Cr 0.6 – 1.8 0.80 – 1.5 0.8 – 1.5 Mo 0.01 – 0.8 0.17 – 0.30 0.17 – 0.30 Element Instant Claim (mass percent) Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) (mass percent) Overlap Al 0.02 – 0.05 0.005 – 0.10 0.02 – 0.05 N 0.01 – 0.025 0 – 0.03 0.01 – 0.025 Fe Balance Balance Balance The Examiner notes that the amounts of carbon, silicon, manganese, copper, nickel, chromium, molybdenum, aluminum, and nitrogen for the steel alloys disclosed by Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) overlap the amounts of the instant invention, which is prima facie evidence of obviousness. MPEP 2144.05 I. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing of the instant invention to select the claimed amounts of carbon, silicon, manganese, copper, nickel, chromium, molybdenum, aluminum, and nitrogen from the amounts disclosed by Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) because Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses the same utility throughout the disclosed ranges. Still regarding claim 1, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses wherein the surface carbon concentration would range from 0.70 to 1.20% and the surface concentration of the nitrogen would be 0 to 0.60% (page 29). As such Expression 1 as applied to Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) would range from 0.70 to 1.71, which would overlap the range of the instant invention. MPEP 2144.05 I. Expression 2 as applied to Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) would range from about 492 to about 632 and would overlap the range of the instant invention. MPEP 2144.05 I. With respect to the recitation “providing a carbonitrided steel material having a hardness of 560 HV or more at a portion from a surface thereof to a depth of 0.05 mm when subjected to a tempering treatment at 500°C after the carbonitriding” in claim 1, since Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses carbonitriding substantially similar compositions, this property would be expected. MPEP 2112.01 I. In regard to claim 2, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses 0.24 to 0.40 mass percent vanadium, which is within the range of the instant invention (pages 5-6 of Translation). In regard to claim 3, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses carbonitrided steel components having compositions relative to that of the instant invention as set forth below (abstract and pages 5-6 of Translation). Element Instant Claim (mass percent) Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) (mass percent) Overlap C 0.15 – 0.25 0.15 – 0.45 0.15 – 0.25 Si 0.01 – 0.24 0 – 0.5 0.01 – 0.24 Mn 0.5 – 1.8 0.20 – 0.60 0.5 – 0.60 Cu 0.001 – 0.3 0 – 0.20 0.001 – 0.20 Ni 0.01 – 0.6 0 – 0.20 0.01 – 0.20 Cr 0.6 – 1.8 0.80 – 1.5 0.8 – 1.5 Mo 0.01 – 0.8 0.17 – 0.30 0.17 – 0.30 Al 0.02 – 0.05 0.005 – 0.10 0.02 – 0.05 N 0.01 – 0.025 0 – 0.03 0.01 – 0.025 V 0 – 0.25 0.24 – 0.40 0.24 – 0.25 Fe Balance Balance Balance The Examiner notes that the amounts of carbon, silicon, manganese, copper, nickel, chromium, molybdenum, aluminum, nitrogen and vanadium for the steel alloys disclosed by Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) overlap the amounts of the instant invention, which is prima facie evidence of obviousness. MPEP 2144.05 I. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing of the instant invention to select the claimed amounts of carbon, silicon, manganese, copper, nickel, chromium, molybdenum, aluminum, nitrogen and vanadium from the amounts disclosed by Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) because Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses the same utility throughout the disclosed ranges. Still regarding claim 3, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses wherein the surface carbon concentration would range from 0.70 to 1.20% and the surface concentration of the nitrogen would be 0 to 0.60% (page 29). As such Expression 1 as applied to Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) would range from 0.70 to 1.71, which would overlap the range of the instant invention. MPEP 2144.05 I. In regard to claim 4, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses wherein the copper content would be 0 to 0.20 mass percent, which overlaps the range of the instant invention (pages 5-6 of Translation). In regard to claim 5, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses 0 to 0.50 mass percent silicon, which encompasses the range of the instant invention (pages 5-6 of Translation). In regard to claim 6, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses 0 to 0.20 mass percent copper, which overlaps the range of the instant invention (pages 5-6 of Translation). In regard to claim 7, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses carbonitrided steel components as set forth above (pages 5-6 of Translation). Still regarding claim 7, Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses wherein the surface carbon concentration would range from 0.70 to 1.20% and the surface concentration of the nitrogen would be 0 to 0.60% (page 29). As such Expression 1 as applied to Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) would range from 0.70 to 1.71, which would overlap the range of the instant invention. MPEP 2144.05 I. Expression 2 as applied to Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) would range from about 492 to about 632 and would overlap the range of the instant invention. MPEP 2144.05 I. With respect to the recitation “providing a carbonitrided steel material having a hardness of 560 HV or more at a portion from a surface thereof to a depth of 0.05 mm when subjected to a tempering treatment at 500°C after the carbonitriding” in claim 7, since Hirakami et al. (WO ‘450) discloses carbonitriding substantially similar compositions, this property would be expected. MPEP 2112.01 I. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Tesker, E. I. "Contact strength of carburized and carbonitrided gears." Metal Science and Heat Treatment 30.2 (1988): 144-147. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jessee Roe whose telephone number is (571)272-5938. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday 7:30 am to 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curt Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSEE R ROE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637742
BIOABSORBABLE MAGNESIUM ALLOY FOR IMPLANTS WITH ENGINEERED ABSORPTION
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630902
HEAT-RESISTANT IR-PT ALLOY
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630914
PROCESSING METHOD AND PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR METAL COMPONENT
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624424
SOLID METAL MATERIAL QUICKLY SOLUBLE IN WATER AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624422
ALUMINUM ALLOY FORGING AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+8.0%)
3y 1m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1287 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month