Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/287,652

SWITCHING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 20, 2023
Examiner
BOLTON, WILLIAM A
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
657 granted / 738 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 738 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment filed December 9th, 2025 has been entered. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1-16 have been amended and claims 17-20 have been added by the Applicant. Applicant’s amendments have overcome claim objections. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4, 8, 11-12 16-17 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Burmeister, US 2089050. Regarding claim 1, Burmeister discloses a switching device comprising: an electrode housing (1) having an opening (at end of housing tube 1); a first electrode (4) provided inside the electrode housing (1); and a second electrode (3) to fit in the opening of the electrode housing (1) in an insertable and detachable manner such that the second electrode (3) comes into and out of contact with the first electrode (4) inside the electrode housing (1) where the electrode housing (1) includes an arc extinguisher (2) to generate an ablation gas [col.2, lines 45-49] through an arc generated between the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3), until the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3) become separated by a certain distance out of contact with each other, a gas including the ablation gas is retained in an enclosed space (formed between 4 and 3 within tube, 1) defined by the first electrode (4), the second electrode (3), and the electrode housing (1), when a distance by which the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3) are separated from each other exceeds the certain distance, the gas in the enclosed space is discharged through a gap defined between the opening and the second electrode (3) moving away from the opening located outside the second electrode (3), such that the gas is blown onto the arc, and the gas in the enclosed space is discharged through the gap between the opening and the second electrode (3) in a direction intersecting the arc generated between the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3). Regarding claim 2, Burmeister further discloses where the electrode housing (1) includes the arc extinguisher (2) defining a surface thereof exposed to the enclosed space. Regarding claim 4, Burmeister further discloses where one end of one of the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3) protrudes in a direction toward a space between another electrode of the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3) and the electrode housing (1) and has an inside diameter greater than an outside diameter of the other electrode (3). Regarding claim 8, Burmeister further discloses where the electrode housing (1) has an inclined inside-diameter surface on a side of the opening. Regarding claim 11, Burmeister further discloses where the second electrode (3) has an outside-diameter surface conformed in shape to an inside-diameter surface of the electrode housing (1) on a side of the opening. Regarding claim 12, Burmeister further discloses where at least one of the first electrode (4) and the second electrode includes a recessed portion (see curve surface at end of electrode) which is a gas reservoir on a surface thereof, and the gas reservoir is a part of the enclosed space when the distance by which the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3) are separated from each other is less than or equal to the certain distance. Regarding claim 16, Burmeister further discloses where the electrode housing (1) is defined by the arc extinguisher (2) to generate the ablation gas [col.2, lines 45-49] through the arc generated between the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3), the arc extinguisher (2) extending from a position where the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3) contact to the opening and covering the first electrode (4) and the second electrode (3) in a peripheral direction. Regarding claim 17, Burmeister further discloses where a first-electrode end of the first electrode (4) and a second-electrode end of the second electrode (3) face each other, and the second-electrode end protrudes in a direction toward a space between the first- electrode end and the electrode housing (1) and has an inside diameter greater than an outside diameter of the first-electrode end, such that the first-electrode end is insertable into the second- electrode end. Regarding claim 20, Burmeister further discloses where the second electrode (3) has an outside-diameter surface conformed in shape to an inclined inside-diameter surface of the electrode housing (1) on a side of the opening, and the outside-diameter surface of the second electrode (3) and the inclined inside-diameter surface of the electrode housing (1) are parallel to each other. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Burmeister in view of Farrer et al, US 2267399 [Farrer]. Regarding claim 3, Burmeister discloses the claimed invention, but silent on wherein at least one of the first electrode and the second electrode includes the arc extinguisher defining a surface thereof exposed to the enclosed space. Farrer disclose (fig.3) a switching device where at least one of a first electrode (movable electrode, 50) and a second electrode includes an arc extinguisher (51) defining a surface thereof exposed to an enclosed space (inside of casing, 47). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the switching device of Burmeister with the substitution of the arc extinguisher sleeved on the electrode, thereby providing gas-evolving material, such that, when subjected to the heat of an arc assist with extinguishing the arc. Regarding claim 9, Burmeister fails to disclose wherein the electrode housing has a round inside-diameter surface on a side of the opening. Farrer disclose (fig.3) a switching device where an electrode housing (59) has a round inside-diameter surface on a side of an opening (at, 60). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the switching device of Burmeister with the teaching of the electrode housing of Farrer, thereby providing gas-evolving material, such that, when subjected to the heat of an arc assist with extinguishing the arc. Claims 5-7 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Burmeister in view Hamano et al, JP 2007335148 [Hamano]. Regarding claim 5, Burmeister fail to disclose a magnetic field generator to generate a magnetic field having a component in a direction orthogonal to the arc. Hamano discloses (figs.7-8) a switching device comprising a magnetic field generator (7) to generate a magnetic field (8) having a component in a direction orthogonal to an arc (6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the switching device of Burmeister with the inclusion of a magnetic generator of Hamano, thereby providing magnetic flux, applying a stronger driving force to the arc, strengthening the radial magnetic field in the vicinity of the tip end portion of the arc contact, crossing the arc and further improving the arc extinguishing performance. Regarding claim 6, Burmeister and Hamano further disclose where the magnetic field generator (7) is a permanent magnet disposed inside at least one of a first electrode (5) and a second electrode (3). Regarding claim 7, Burmeister and Hamano further disclose where the magnetic field generator includes a magnetic body (Hamano, 26) disposed inside at least one of the first electrode (Hamano, 24), and a permanent magnet (27) disposed in a space external to an enclosed space [see fig.11]. Regarding claim 19, Burmeister and Hamano further disclose where the magnetic field generator comprises a magnetic body (Hamano, 26) disposed inside at least one of the first electrode (Hamano, 24), and a permanent magnet (27) attached to an electric field limiter (28) disposed outside the one of a first electrode (24) and a second electrode (25) [see fig.11]. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Burmeister in view Sato et al, JP 2010244742 [Sato]. Regarding claim 10, Burmeister fails to disclose wherein the electrode housing has a grooved inside-diameter surface on a side of the opening. Sato discloses (figs.1-2) a switching device where an electrode housing (4) has a grooved inside-diameter surface (13) on a side of an opening. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the electrode housing of Burmeister with the teaching of the electrode housing of Sato, thereby providing a swirling component to the arc extinguishing gases, thus improving large current cut-off performance. Claims 13-15 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Burmeister in view Kanetaka et al, JPH 08212882 [Kanetaka]. Regarding claim 13, Burmeister fails to disclose wherein a ventilation region between the enclosed space and a space external to the enclosed space. Kanetaka discloses (figs.1-5) a gas switch where a ventilation region (2A) between an enclosed space (17) and a space (tank) external to the enclosed space (17). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the switch of Burmeister with the teaching of the electrode assembly of Kanetaka, thereby providing a vent channel providing a means of replenishing the arc extinguishing chamber with fresh extinguishing fluids, after an arcing event. Regarding claim 14, Burmeister and Kanetaka further disclose a second electrode (1) includes the ventilation region (2A). Regarding claim 15, Burmeister and Kanetaka further disclose where the ventilation region (2A) includes a check valve (20) attached thereto, and the check valve (20) of the ventilation region (2A) prevents a gas flow from the enclosed space (17) toward the space external (tank) to the enclosed space (17) and, when a pressure difference between the enclosed space (17) and the space external (tank) to the enclosed space (17) becomes greater than or equal to a predetermined pressure difference, opens to allow a gas flow from the space external (tank) to the enclosed space (17) toward the enclosed space (17) [para.0012]. Regarding claim 18, Burmeister fails to disclose wherein the gas discharged from the enclosed space flows in a first gas flow direction from an internal space of the second-electrode end and in a second gas flow direction from the space between the electrode housing and the first-electrode end, the gas in the first and second gas flow directions being blown onto the arc and reducing a diameter of the arc. Kanetaka discloses (figs.1-5) a gas switch where a gas discharged from an enclosed space (17) flows in a first gas flow direction from an internal space (12) of a second-electrode (4) end and in a second gas flow direction from the space (17) between an electrode housing (2) and a first-electrode (1) end, the gas in first and second gas flow directions (12A, 12B) being blown onto an arc (13) and reducing a diameter of the arc (13). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the switch of Burmeister with the teaching of the switch of Kanetaka, thereby providing an internal pressure of the extinguishing chamber rises due to the arc heat; during the opening progressed in a second gas flow direction the gas is blown onto the arc, cooling the arc and interrupting the current. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM A BOLTON whose telephone number is (571)270-5887. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 7:30AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee S Luebke can be reached at (571)-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM A BOLTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 20, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 20, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 05, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 05, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 09, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603239
Medium Voltage or High Voltage Circuit Breaker
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597579
CIRCUIT BREAKER AND POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597573
PYROTECHNIC CIRCUIT BREAKER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592350
POWER FUSE AND AIRCRAFT COMPRISING SUCH A POWER FUSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586738
ELECTRONIC SNUBBER FOR ELIMINATION OF SWITCH CONTACT IMPEDANCE INCREASE AND ARC CONTAMINANT DEPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.6%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 738 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month