Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/287,879

AN OMEGA-TRANSAMINASE MUTANT BASED ON ANCESTRAL SEQUENCE RECONSTRUCTION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 21, 2023
Examiner
BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE
Art Unit
1657
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
25%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 25% of cases
25%
Career Allow Rate
17 granted / 69 resolved
-35.4% vs TC avg
Strong +62% interview lift
Without
With
+61.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
118
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§103
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§112
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 69 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION The preliminary claim amendment filed 10/21/2023 is entered. Claim 10 is new. Claims 1-10 are pending and under consideration in this action. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. The instant claims are entitled to an effective filing date of 12/05/2022. Specification Abstract: Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The abstract filed 10/21/2021 recites the following: “The present invention discloses” in line 1, which is an implied phrase that should be avoided; “an ω-transaminase mutant based on ancestral sequence reconstruction” in line 1, which is a repeat of the invention title; and “said” in line 3, which is legal phraseology that should be avoided. Disclosure: The disclosure is objected to because it contains an embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code. Applicant is required to delete the embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code; references to websites should be limited to the top-level domain name without any prefix such as http:// or other browser-executable code. See MPEP § 608.01. Page 3 line 7 includes the browser-executable code: https://loschmidt.chemi.muni.cz/fireprotasr/. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The specification recites “T130S-R130K”, which should be replaced with “T130S-R131K” in the following places: page 3 line 22, page 6 line 24, and page 12 line 3. Appropriate correction is required. Examiner Comment Instant SEQ ID NOs: 4 and 6 are synthetic ω-transaminase sequences. Compared to the wild-type sequence from Aspergillus terreus (SEQ ID NO: 2, 326aa), SEQ ID NO: 4 (330aa) and SEQ ID NO: 6 (328aa) include the following mutations: D5E, A12Q, I17V, S20A, T21S, E22A, T23S, A42H, I77L, T78S, R90K, D96E, Q97E, E104D, T130S, R131K, I135L, an insert of N after residue 138, V143I, D153E, V157T, V162I, V163I, A195S, H210N, Q236E, N245D, A246V, E248R, F250N, F258V, R266Q, T284S, M288K, G292D, Q294K, I295V, A313P, N322E, E323S, R324A, and N325S. SEQ ID NO: 4 further includes: T85S, L87M, D134E, A174S, I175M, V188T, and an insert of KKSG after residue 325. SEQ ID NO: 6 further includes T85A, M154V, L263M, and an insert of KS after residue 325. See page 6 line 17 to page 7 line 2 of the instant specification. Claim Objections Claims 1-10 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 1 and 4 recite “sequence as shown in SEQ”, which should be replaced with “sequence of SEQ” to be more concise. Claims 2-10 recite “as claimed in claim”, which is redundant and should be replaced with “of claim”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, 4-5, and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 2, 5, and 8 recite “[a] method” in line 1, but they do not recite any active method steps. MPEP 2173.05(q) states that “attempts to claim a process without setting forth any steps involved in the process generally raises an issue of indefiniteness”. Claim 2 requires utilizing the ω-transaminase mutant, claim 5 requires utilizing the gene encoding the ω-transaminase mutant, and claim 8 requires utilizing the genetically engineered bacterium comprising the gene encoding the ω-transaminase mutant. However, claims 2, 5 and 8 do not set forth any steps involved in such utilization processes. Claim 4 recites “a gene sequence shown in SEQ ID NO. 3 or SEQ ID NO. 5”, which is indefinite because it is unclear whether the claim intends to encompass only the full-length gene, or both the full-length gene and fragments thereof. That is, “a gene sequence shown in SEQ ID NO. 3 or SEQ ID NO. 5” could reasonably be interpreted as encompassing gene fragments. However, claim 4 depends from claim 1, which is clearly limited to the full-length sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4 or 6. As such, claim 4 may also reasonably be interpreted as being limited to the full-length gene sequence of SEQ ID NO. 3 or SEQ ID NO. 5 because SEQ ID NOs: 3 and 5 encode SEQ ID NOs: 4 and 6 respectively. To obviate this rejection, claim 4 can be amended to replace “a gene sequence shown in SEQ ID NO. 3 or SEQ ID NO. 5” with the limitation of “the gene sequence of SEQ ID NO. 3 or SEQ ID NO. 5”. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 1 and 9 require the ω-transaminase mutant having SEQ ID NO: 4 (330aa) or SEQ ID NO: 6 (328aa); claims 3, 6-7 and 10 require a gene encoding the ω-transaminase mutant thereof. SEQ ID NOs: 4 and 6 and their corresponding full-length genes are free of the prior art. The prior art reference disclosing the closest similarity is Huang (CN112481230, published 03/12/2021) as cited in the IDS filed 10/21/2023; the English translation of Huang is provided herein. Huang teaches a mutant ω-transaminase having an amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 1 (321aa), wherein the mutation sites include H210N-N245D-E253A-G292D substitutions. See claim 1 of Huang. This mutant of Huang is 88% identical to the instant SEQ ID NO: 4 and 89.2% identical to the instant SEQ ID NO: 6. See the office action appendix for the alignment. Huang also teaches additional relevant mutations: I77L, Q97E, and I295V. See claim 1 of Huang. However, it would not have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the instantly claimed invention to modify SEQ ID NO: 1 of Huang to arrive at the instantly claimed ω-transaminase mutant having SEQ ID NO: 4 or 6. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLY C BREEN whose telephone number is (571)272-0980. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30-4:30, F 8:30-1:30 (EDT/EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LOUISE HUMPHREY can be reached at (571)272-5543. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LOUISE W HUMPHREY/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1657 /K.C.B./Examiner, Art Unit 1657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577292
FERRITIN NANOCAGE FOR MULTI-DISPLAYING TRAIL TRIMER AND CANCER-TARGETING PEPTIDE AND USE THEREOF AS ANTICANCER AGENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578329
REAGENT KIT CONTAINING POLYPEPTIDE FOR USE IN DETECTION OF INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12527323
FUSION PROTEINS, RECOMBINANT BACTERIA, AND EXOSPORIUM FRAGMENTS FOR PEST CONTROL AND PLANT HEALTH
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12436145
CRYPTIC ANTIBIOTICS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING BIOACTIVE CRYPTIC METABOLITES
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Patent 12433938
ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE POLYPEPTIDES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
25%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+61.7%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 69 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month