Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/288,149

ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT, ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 24, 2023
Priority
Apr 26, 2021 — JP 2021-074488 +1 more
Examiner
SELLS, JAMES D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Idemitsu Kosan Co.,ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
737 granted / 905 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
916
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 905 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tasaki et al (WO 2021/049653) in view of Yabunouchi et al (WO 2010/114017) Tasaki discloses an organic EL element comprising, in the following order: an anode; a second hole transport layer (electron barrier layer) (EBL) comprising a compound HT2, etc.; a first light-emitting layer comprising a first host material and a compound exhibiting fluorescence emission having a main peak wavelength of 500 nm or shorter; a second light-emitting layer comprising a second host material different from the first host material, and a compound exhibiting fluorescence emission having a main peak wavelength of 500 nm or shorter; and a cathode, wherein a triplet energy T1 (H1) of the first host material and a triplet energy T1 (H2) of the second host material satisfy the relationship given by mathematical expression (1)” (see claims 1, 4-5, 16, paragraphs [0002], [0913]). Tasaki further discloses the “anode”, the “compound HT2”, the “second hole transport layer (electron barrier layer) (EBL)”, the “first host material”, the “compound exhibiting fluorescence emission having a main peak wavelength of 500 nm or shorter”, the “first light-emitting layer”, the “second host material”, the “compound exhibiting fluorescence emission having a main peak wavelength of 500 nm or shorter”, the “second light-emitting layer”, the “cathode” and the “organic EL element” of the cited invention correspond to the “anode”, the “hole transport band material”, the “first organic layer”, the “first host material”, the “first luminescent compound”, the “first light-emitting layer”, the “second host material”, the “second luminescent compound”, the “second light-emitting layer”, the “cathode” and the “organic electroluminescent element” of the present invention 1. A person skilled in the art could easily conceive of satisfying the relationship of claim 4 in order to smooth the transport of holes from the “second hole transport layer (electron barrier layer) (EBL)” to the “first host material” in the cited invention. Tasaki discloses examples in which HT4-2, HT4, HT6, HT7, HT8, HT9 or HT11 are used in addition to compound HT2 in the second hole transport layer (electron barrier layer) (EBL). A person skilled in the art could easily conceive of incorporating further compounds, from among the above compounds, etc., into the “second hole transport layer (electron barrier layer) (EBL)” of the cited invention. Using a compound having delayed fluorescence in a light-emitting layer is a well-known feature in the technical field of organic EL elements (e.g., see paragraphs [0094], [0120]-[0122] of document 4). A person skilled in the art could therefore easily conceive of using a well-known compound having delayed fluorescence in the light-emitting layers of green pixels and red pixels in the cited invention. Using organic materials having different affinities in a light-emitting layer is a well-known feature in the technical field of organic EL elements. A person skilled in the art could therefore easily conceive of incorporating an organic material having an affinity value lower than that of a compound having delayed fluorescence, and that is used in green pixels and red pixels, in the cited invention. However, Tasaki does not disclose an affinity value Af (cHT) of the hole transport band material is lower than 1.47 eV, and the affinity value Af (cHT) of the hole transport band material is a value measured by differential pulse voltammetry, whereas the cited invention specifies no such feature. Regarding this difference, the applicant is directed to the reference of Yabunouchi. Yabunouchi discloses setting the affinity value of an electron barrier layer lower than that of a light-emitting layer to impart electron blocking properties, and to confine, in the light-emitting layer, electrons coming from the cathode side and increase luminous efficiency (e.g., see paragraphs [0020], [0038], [0040], [0043]). For the purpose of increasing luminous efficiency, a person skilled in the art could therefore easily conceive of using a hole transport band material having a low affinity value Af (cHT) in the “second hole transport layer (electron barrier layer) (EBL)” of the cited invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES D SELLS whose telephone number is (571)272-1237. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMES D. SELLS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1745 /JAMES D SELLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742912
ANTI-FOGGING COMPOSITION
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733699
MULTIPLE LAYER GLOVE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735608
HIGH FREQUENCY WELDABLE POLYOLEFIN COMPOSITION
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729312
Novel Compound, Coating Composition Comprising Same, Organic Light-Emitting Device Using Same, and Manufacturing Method Therefor
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733430
SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING APPARATUS
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 905 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month