Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/288,273

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSPORTING ENERGY BY SHIP

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Oct 25, 2023
Priority
May 10, 2021 — JP 2021-080079 +1 more
Examiner
WANG, MICHAEL H
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Powerx Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
358 granted / 687 resolved
At TC average
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
739
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice to Applicant Claims 1, 4-8, and 10 have been examined in this application. This communication is a final rejection in response to the “Amendments to the claims” and “Remarks” filed 4/3/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4, 6, 10 are rejected under 35 USC 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US Patent Application Number 2022/0081781 by Zhu in view of US Patent Application Number 2020/0185917 by Haugan. Regarding claim 1, Zhu discloses an energy transportation system comprising: A transportation ship (transport ship 8) provided with a storage storing an energy source (paragraph 28 discloses “the transport ship 8 being used for extracting hydrogen in the large hydrogen storage tank 3 periodically and transporting the hydrogen to the land”); A power generation facility located outside the transportation ship and configured to supply an energy source to the storage (paragraph 17 discloses “electrolyzing seawater by a seawater electrolytic cell device to produce hydrogen”); and A reception facility located outside the transportation ship and configured to receive a supply of an energy source from the storage (paragraph 63 discloses “hydrogen can be conveyed to the land to be used as a fuel and the like by human” and Figure 3 shows ship 8 delivering to a facility), wherein The transportation ship includes a hull (hull of ship 8). Zhu does not disclose the storage being a plurality of battery cells storing electric energy for transportation, the hull includes a drive battery and a motor, and navigates without consuming the electric energy stored in the plurality of battery cells by supplying electric energy stored in the drive battery to the motor, and the plurality of battery cells and the drive battery are electrically connected, and the transportation ship allows the electric energy stored in the plurality of battery cells to be supplied to the drive battery. However, these limitations are taught by Haugan. Haugan discloses an electrical energy distribution system for a vessel such as a ship with a primary comprising diesel motors coupled to AC electric generators that is then converted into DC (paragraph 53) where the energy from the DC circuits is stored in a stored energy source (paragraph 11), a plurality of backup electric energy storage elements that provides power to the AC consumers in the event of failure of the primary electric energy supply (paragraph 23) can be removed from the energy supply (paragraph 26). It would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhu using the teachings from Haugan to substitute different types of known fuels for ships and to provide backup power in the event of a motor failure. Furthermore, Zhu as modified by Haugan teaches the power generation facility configured to supply electric energy to the plurality of battery cells and the reception facility configured to receive a supply of electric energy from the plurality of battery cells. Zhu discloses a hydrogen generation facility and a reception facility for hydrogen fuel, and Haugan provides a teaching to use electricity stored in batteries as fuel. Zhu and Haugan do not disclose a container that is removable from the hull and includes the plurality of battery cells. However, paragraph 26 of Haugan suggests that “Each one of the plural backup electric energy storage elements may, individually or in combination with other backup electric energy storage elements, be disconnected from the first DC-circuit, in order to remove them from the ring”. It would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhu and Haugan to use a container for the plurality of backup electric energy storage elements in order to make it easier for them to be removed from the ring . Regarding claim 4 (dependent on claim 1), Zhu discloses the power generation facility is located offshore. Zhu discusses offshore wind power plants throughout, as well as the bottom of large hydrogen storage tank 3 being erected on a seabed. Regarding claim 6 (dependent on claim 1), Zhu discloses the reception facility is located on shore. Paragraph 28 discloses “the transport ship 8 being used for extracting hydrogen in the large hydrogen storage tank 3 periodically and transporting the hydrogen to the land”. Land is on shore. Regarding claim 10, James discloses an energy transportation system comprising transporting an energy source by a transportation ship provided with a storage storing the energy source (paragraph 28 discloses “the transport ship 8 being used for extracting hydrogen in the large hydrogen storage tank 3 periodically and transporting the hydrogen to the land”) from a power generation facility outside the transportation ship (paragraph 17 discloses “electrolyzing seawater by a seawater electrolytic cell device to produce hydrogen”) to a reception facility outside the transportation ship (paragraph 63 discloses “hydrogen can be conveyed to the land to be used as a fuel and the like by human” and Figure 3 shows ship 8 delivering to a facility), wherein the transportation ship comprises a hull (hull of transport ship 8). Zhu does not disclose the storage being a plurality of battery cells storing electric energy for transportation, the hull includes a drive battery and a motor, the plurality of battery cells and the drive battery are electrically connected, and the transport includes navigating the transportation ship without consuming the electric energy stored in the plurality of battery cells by supplying electric energy stored in the drive battery to the motor, and allowing the electric energy stored in the plurality of battery cells to be supplied to the drive battery. However, these limitations are taught by Haugan. Haugan discloses an electrical energy distribution system for a vessel such as a ship with a primary comprising diesel motors coupled to AC electric generators that is then converted into DC (paragraph 53) where the energy from the DC circuits is stored in a stored energy source (paragraph 11), a plurality of backup electric energy storage elements that provides power to the AC consumers in the event of failure of the primary electric energy supply (paragraph 23) can be removed from the energy supply (paragraph 26). It would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhu using the teachings from Haugan to substitute different types of known fuels for ships and to provide backup power in the event of a motor failure. Furthermore, Zhu as modified by Haugan teaches the power generation facility configured to supply electric energy to the plurality of battery cells and the reception facility configured to receive a supply of electric energy from the plurality of battery cells. Zhu discloses a hydrogen generation facility and a reception facility for hydrogen fuel, and Haugan provides a teaching to use electricity stored in batteries as fuel. Zhu and Haugan do not disclose a container that is removable from the hull and includes the plurality of battery cells. However, paragraph 26 of Haugan suggests that “Each one of the plural backup electric energy storage elements may, individually or in combination with other backup electric energy storage elements, be disconnected from the first DC-circuit, in order to remove them from the ring”. It would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhu and Haugan to use a container for the plurality of backup electric energy storage elements in order to make it easier for them to be removed from the ring . Claims 5, 7 are rejected under 35 USC 103 as being obvious over US Patent Application Number 2022/0081781 by Zhu in view of US Patent Application Number 2020/0185917 by Haugan, in further view of US Patent Application Number 2009/0115190 by Devine. Regarding claim 5 (dependent on claim 4), Zhu does not disclose the transportation ship at sea receives an energy source form the power generation facility via a cable. However, this limitation is taught by Devine. Devine discloses a system for producing hydrogen offshore and transporting the hydrogen using container ships 31 to a port 30, and paragraph 98 discloses “the spherical type container 101 is in liquid communication with hydrogen through pipe 105 and conduit 106…hydrogen may be transferred away from the container 101 to a shipping container either located on a ship or a container that may be loaded onto a ship”. It would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhu using the teachings from Devine to use known ways to transport hydrogen from a storage tank to a transport ship. Regarding claim 7 (dependent on claim 6), Zhu and Devine do not explicitly disclose the transportation ship at sea supplies an energy source to the reception facility via a cable. However, Devine suggests the use of conduit 106 to transfer hydrogen between storage container 101 and a ship, and paragraph 50 discloses a port 30 on land that can receive and store hydrogen from ships 31 and 32. It would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhu and Devine to use conduits to also transfer the hydrogen between the ship and port 30. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 USC 103 as being obvious over US Patent Application Number 2022/0081781 by Zhu in view of US Patent Application Number 2020/0185917 by Haugan, in further view of US Patent Application Number 2015/0144500 by James. Regarding claim 8 (dependent on claim 1), Zhu and Haugan do not disclose the reception facility is a ship capable of navigating using electric energy supplied from the transportation ship as a power source. However, this limitation is taught by James. James discloses an offshore hydrogen production facility, and paragraph 24 discloses “the hydrogen 145 separated from the water may be used to power the one or more previously decommissioned US Navy ships 107 as transport ships 117”. It would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify Zhu using the teachings from James in order to use the hydrogen produced in known ways. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 4/3/2026 have been fully considered but they are moot in view of the current grounds of rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL H WANG whose telephone number is (571)272-6554. The examiner can normally be reached 10-6:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Josh Michener can be reached at 571-272-1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MICHAEL H. WANG Primary Examiner Art Unit 3642 /MICHAEL H WANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 03, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745692
Structure for Treating Saline Alkali Soil and Biological Treatment Method
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741756
Modular Spacecraft Bus System and Associated Methods
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12721713
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR HANDLING POULTRY ANIMALS
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717061
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COCKROACH MONITORING
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12703490
COMBINED DE-ICING DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+25.5%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month