Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/289,144

TERMINAL APPARATUS, BASE STATION APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 01, 2023
Priority
May 07, 2021 — JP 2021-079006 +1 more
Examiner
O CONNOR, BRIAN T
Art Unit
2465
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
769 granted / 901 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
931
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 901 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to Applicant’s amendment filed on 01/28/2026. Claims 4-8 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 4, 6, and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kittichokechai et al. (US 2023/0171778 A1; hereafter KITT). With respect to claim 4, KITT discloses a terminal apparatus (412-4, 412-2, 412-1 of FIG. 4; 412 of FIG. 5) comprising: a receiver (2500, 2510 in FIG. 25) configured to receive a radio resource control (RRC) message including a higher layer parameter (1600, 1602 in FIG. 16; 500 in FIG. 5; paragraphs [0118] and [0121] and [0122]; see the RRC parameter ‘nrofSubslots value); and a transmitter (2500, 2508 in FIG. 25) configured to transmit a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) (1604 of FIG. 16; 502 in FIG. 5), wherein a transmission of the PUCCH is repeated (PUCCH Rep#1, PUCCH Rep#2 in FIG. 9; PUCCH Rep#1, PUCCH Rep#2 in FIG. 10), a length of a time domain window is configured by the higher layer parameter (1600, 1602 in FIG. 16; 500 in FIG. 5; paragraphs [0118] and [0121] and [0122]; see the RRC parameter ‘nrofSubslots value), a start position of the time domain window is a first slot for the transmission of the PUCCH being repeated (paragraphs [0132] and [0135]), a hopping interval is a same length as the time domain window (1600, 1602 in FIG. 16; 500 in FIG. 5; paragraphs [0118] and [0121] and [0122]; see the RRC parameter ‘nrofSubslots value), and a physical resource block (PRB) related to repetition of the transmission of the PUCCH is switched between a first PRB and a second PRB in every one of the hopping interval (paragraph [0141], see the first PRB and second PRB for even and odd numbered sub-slots). With respect to claim 6, KITT discloses a base station apparatus (402-1, 402-2 in FIG. 4; 402 in FIG. 5) comprising: a transmitter (2212 in FIG. 22) configured to transmit a radio resource control (RRC) message including a higher layer parameter (1600, 1602 in FIG. 16; 500 in FIG. 5; paragraphs [0118] and [0121] and [0122]; see the RRC parameter ‘nrofSubslots value); and a receiver (2214 in FIG. 22) configured to receive a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) (1604 of FIG. 16; 502 in FIG. 5), wherein a transmission of the PUCCH is repeated (PUCCH Rep#1, PUCCH Rep#2 in FIG. 9; PUCCH Rep#1, PUCCH Rep#2 in FIG. 10), a length of a time domain window is configured by the higher layer parameter (1600, 1602 in FIG. 16; 500 in FIG. 5; paragraphs [0118] and [0121] and [0122]; see the RRC parameter ‘nrofSubslots value), a start position of the time domain window is a first slot for the transmission of the PUCCH being repeated (paragraphs [0132] and [0135]), a hopping interval is a same length as the time domain window (1600, 1602 in FIG. 16; 500 in FIG. 5; paragraphs [0118] and [0121] and [0122]; see the RRC parameter ‘nrofSubslots value), and a physical resource block (PRB) related to repetition of the transmission of the PUCCH is switched between a first PRB and a second PRB in every one of the hopping interval (paragraph [0141], see the first PRB and second PRB for even and odd numbered sub-slots). With respect to claim 8, KITT discloses a communication method (Abstract, Title) used in a terminal apparatus (412-4, 412-2, 412-1 of FIG. 4; 412 of FIG. 5), the communication method comprising: receiving a radio resource control (RRC) message including a higher layer parameter (1600, 1602 in FIG. 16; 500 in FIG. 5; paragraphs [0118] and [0121] and [0122]; see the RRC parameter ‘nrofSubslots value); and transmitting a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) (1604 of FIG. 16; 502 in FIG. 5), wherein a transmission of the PUCCH is repeated (PUCCH Rep#1, PUCCH Rep#2 in FIG. 9; PUCCH Rep#1, PUCCH Rep#2 in FIG. 10), a length of a time domain window is configured by the higher layer parameter (1600, 1602 in FIG. 16; 500 in FIG. 5; paragraphs [0118] and [0121] and [0122]; see the RRC parameter ‘nrofSubslots value), a start position of the time domain window is a first slot for the transmission of the PUCCH being repeated (paragraphs [0132] and [0135]), a hopping interval is a same length as the time domain window (1600, 1602 in FIG. 16; 500 in FIG. 5; paragraphs [0118] and [0121] and [0122]; see the RRC parameter ‘nrofSubslots value), and a physical resource block (PRB) related to repetition of the transmission of the PUCCH is switched between a first PRB and a second PRB in every one of the hopping interval (paragraph [0141], see the first PRB and second PRB for even and odd numbered sub-slots). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KITT in view of LIN et al. (US 2025/0279872 A1; hereafter LIN). With respect to claim 5, KITT does not disclose the terminal apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the terminal apparatus maintains phase continuity and power consistency within the time domain window. LIN discloses wherein the terminal apparatus maintains phase continuity and power consistency within the time domain window (708 in FIG. 7; paragraphs [0255], [0256], [0257], [0258], [0259], [0260], [0277] and [0306]). LIN teaches the benefit of improved data reception performance by using coherent transmissions (paragraph [0029] and [0030]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use coherent setting as taught by LIN with the apparatuses of KITT to produce an expected result. With respect to claim 7, KITT does not disclose the base station apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the receiver is configured to receive the PUCCH with an expectation that phase continuity and power consistency are maintained within the time domain window. LIN discloses wherein the receiver is configured to receive the PUCCH with an expectation that phase continuity and power consistency are maintained within the time domain window (708 in FIG. 7; paragraphs [0255], [0256], [0257], [0258], [0259], [0260], [0277] and [0306]). LIN teaches the benefit of improved data reception performance by using coherent transmissions (paragraph [0029] and [0030]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use coherent setting as taught by LIN with the apparatuses of KITT to produce an expected result. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed on 01/28/2026, with respect to the rejection of claims 4, 6, and 8 under Taherzadeh Boroujeni et al. have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of Kittichokechai et al.. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian T O'Connor whose telephone number is (571)270-1081. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri Flex 10am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached at 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN T O CONNOR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465 May 23, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 28, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684550
BEAM MANAGEMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684544
RESOURCE DETERMINING METHOD AND DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684577
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677285
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, USER EQUIPMENT, AND BASE STATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672048
SMART DEVICE APPLICATION PRIORITIZATION FOR SATELLITE NETWORKS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 10m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 901 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month