Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/289,471

MIXER, AIR CAP, AND MIX CHAMBER ASSEMBLY FOR A PLURAL COMPONENT SPRAYER

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Nov 03, 2023
Priority
May 20, 2021 — provisional 63/190,788 +3 more
Examiner
KIM, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Graco Minnesota Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
724 granted / 1143 resolved
-6.7% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
1196
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1143 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The response filed on September 10, 2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement Regarding the IDS filed on August 28, 2026, US 2015/0108254 was listed on PTO-892 mailed on August 17, 2026. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, Species A1 (figure 1A), Species B1 (figure 2A), and Species C1 (figure 3A) in the reply filed on January 15, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 28 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 28 recites the limitation “a chamber seal.” It appears to be a double inclusion of the “chamber seal” recited in claim 5. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claim(s) 1-3, 8-13, 17, 20 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gammons (4,708,292). Gammons discloses a mixer configured for a plural component sprayer, the mixer comprising: a mix chamber body (body of nozzle 28); a mix bore 94 (bore of nozzle 28 occupied by valve rod 29) at least partially within the mix chamber body and extending along an axis (longitudinal axis of valve rod 29 and nozzle 28), the mix bore extending from a closed end (left end in figure 2 which is closed by valving rod 29 in the open position) within the mix chamber body to an outlet orifice (outlet of nozzle 28 at its downstream end), the outlet orifice formed at a first end (downstream end) of the mixer; a first inlet bore 40 extending through the mix chamber body to the mix bore; a second inlet bore 41 extending through the mix chamber body to the mix bore; and a seal head 44 (frusto-conical portion of nozzle 28 that contacts nozzle seat contact surface 75) of the mix chamber body disposed at a second end (upstream end) of the mixer opposite the outlet orifice, wherein the seal head has an exterior surface (exterior surface of frusto-concial portion of nozzle 28) that converges (see figure 2) towards the axis; wherein the first inlet bore and the second inlet bore extend through the seal head (see figure 2); wherein the seal head is one of frustoconical (col. 6, l. 10; see figures 2 and 3) and conical; a retaining head 30 disposed at the first end of the mixer, the mix bore extending through the retaining head; further comprising a projection 47 (notch 47 extends outwardly relative to cylindrical portions 90 and 91) extending outward from the mix chamber body, the projection configured to prevent rotation of the mixer about the axis; further comprising: a neck 90 extending between and connecting the retaining head and the mix chamber body, the retaining head extending further outward from the axis than the neck; wherein the mix chamber body extends radially outward relative to the neck and the retaining head (surface 92 extends radially outward) at an end opposite the retaining head; wherein the first inlet bore has a first diameter, the mix bore has a second diameter, and the second diameter is larger than the first diameter (see figure 2); wherein the retaining head includes exterior threading (threads of cap 30 are on an exterior surface of cap 30). Gammons discloses a mixer chamber assembly comprising: an air cap 30 (recitation “air” does not define structure; cap 30 is exposed to air) having a central opening therethrough; the mixer of claim 1 (see above) mounted to the air cap and at least partially disposed within the central opening; wherein the mixer further comprises: a neck 90, 91 extending from an end of the mix chamber body; and a retaining head 20 disposed at an end of the neck such that the neck extends between and connects the retaining head and the mix chamber body; wherein the mix bore extends through the neck and the retaining head; and wherein an annular recess (recess for seal 45) is formed about the neck and axially between the retaining head and the mix chamber body; wherein the retaining head includes first threads 43 and the air cap includes second threads (threads of cap 30) formed in the central opening. Claim(s) 1, 5, 6, 7, 17, 20, 22-24 and 140 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Commette et al. (2015/0108254). Commette et al. disclose a mixer configured for a plural component sprayer, the mixer comprising: a mix chamber body 240; a mix bore 250 at least partially within the mix chamber body and extending along an axis (longitudinal axis of valve rod 360 and insert 240), the mix bore extending from a closed end (upstream end closed by rod 360 in the open position) within the mix chamber body to an outlet orifice (outlet of insert 240), the outlet orifice formed at a first end (downstream end) of the mixer; a first inlet bore 254 extending through the mix chamber body to the mix bore; a second inlet bore 258 extending through the mix chamber body to the mix bore; and a seal head 246, 248 of the mix chamber body disposed at a second end (upstream end) of the mixer opposite the outlet orifice, wherein the seal head has an exterior surface that converges (see figure 11 and 12) towards the axis; wherein a seal groove 252 is formed on the seal head, the seal groove extending into the exterior surface and configured to receive a chamber seal (not positively recited; recess 252 has an annular shape capable of receiving an annular seal); wherein the seal groove extends annularly about the axis (the recess 252 is annular and is at least partially about the axis); wherein a first seal shoulder (vertical surface of recess 252 at the upper end in figures 11 and 12) is formed at a first end of the seal groove and a second seal shoulder (vertical surface of recess 252 at the lower end in figures 11 and 12) is formed at a second end of the seal groove, the second seal shoulder projecting further radially from a base of the seal groove and relative to the axis than the first seal shoulder (see figures 11 and 12), the second seal should spaced axially from the first seal shoulder relative to the axis. Commette et al. disclose a mixer chamber assembly comprising: an air cap 218 (recitation “air” does not define structure; tip 218 is exposed to air) having a central opening therethrough; the mixer of claim 1 (see above) mounted to the air cap and at least partially disposed within the central opening; wherein the mixer further comprises: a neck (portion of insert 240 within tip 218) extending from an end of the mix chamber body; and a retaining head 210, 280 disposed at an end of the neck such that the neck extends between and connects (vis tip 218) the retaining head and the mix chamber body; wherein the mix bore extends through the neck and the retaining head; and wherein an annular recess (recess around end 242) is formed about the neck and axially between the retaining head and the mix chamber body; wherein the air cap includes a mount extension (portion of tip 218 surrounding end 242) at least partially disposed within the annular recess; wherein the retaining head is sized such that an interface (interface between tip 218 and air cap 210) between the retaining head and the mount extension prevents the mount extension from passing axially over the retaining head and out of the annular recess in an axial direction away from the mix chamber body; wherein the air cap is rotatable about the axis relative to the mixer with the mount disposed in the annular recess. Commette et al. disclose a mixer configured for a plural component sprayer, the mixer comprising: a mix chamber body 240; a mix bore 250 at least partially within the mix chamber body and extending along an axis (longitudinal axis of valve rod 360 and insert 240), the mix bore extending to an outlet orifice (outlet of insert 240), the outlet orifice formed at a first end (downstream end) of the mixer; a first inlet bore 254 extending through the mix chamber body to the mix bore; a second inlet bore 258 extending through the mix chamber body to the mix bore; and a seal head 246, 248 of the mix chamber body disposed at a second end (upstream end) of the mixer opposite the outlet orifice, wherein the seal head has an exterior surface that converges (see figure 11 and 12) towards the axis; and a seal groove 252 is formed on the seal head, the seal groove extending into the exterior surface and configured to receive a chamber seal (not positively recited; recess 252 has an annular shape capable of receiving an annular seal) the seal groove including a first seal shoulder (vertical surface of recess 252 at the upper end in figures 11 and 12) is formed at a first end of the seal groove and a second seal shoulder (vertical surface of recess 252 at the lower end in figures 11 and 12) formed at a second end of the seal groove; wherein a height (distance from the outer end of the vertical surface of recess 252 at the lower end in figures 11 and 12 to where passageway 254 enters recess 252) of the second seal shoulder from a base (where passageway 254 enters recess 252) of the seal groove is greater than a height (distance from the outer end of the vertical surface of recess 252 at the upper end in figures 11 and 12 to where passageway 254 enters recess 252) of the first seal shoulder from the base of the seal groove, the second seal shoulder spaced axially from the first seal shoulder relative to the axis. Note, this Office action avoids repetitive rejections. Claims otherwise rejected under Gammons have not been additionally rejected under Commette et al. This is not an indication that Commette et al. do not disclose those the claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed September 10, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the mix chamber body 48 and the seal head 120 are separately disclosed. The specification discloses that the mix chamber body 48 includes shoulder 118 and seal head 120. The seal head 120 is an element of the mix chamber body 48. Therefore, to state the seal head and the mix chamber body as two separate and distinct elements is a double inclusion of parts. Applicant argues that the prior art fails to disclose the mix bore extending from a closed end within the mix chamber body to an outlet orifice. In Gammons, the upstream end of the mix chamber body is closed by the valving rod 29 when the valving rod is retracted to open the mix chamber body. In Commette et al., the upstream end of the mix chamber body 240 is closed by the rod 360 when the rod is retracted to open the mix chamber body. Regarding new claim 140, the height/distance from the base (where passageway 254 enters recess 252) of the recess 252 to the outer edge of the vertical surface of recess 252 at the lower end in figures 11 and 12 is greater than the height/distance from the base of the seal groove to the outer edge of the vertical surface of recess 252 at the upper end in figures 11 and 12. Claim 140 allows for a broader interpretation than that taken by Applicant. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4905. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur O Hall can be reached at (571) 270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER S KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752 CHRISTOPHER S. KIM Examiner Art Unit 3752 CK
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
May 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jul 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 31, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Sep 10, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752138
SCREENING MACHINE FOR SCREENING SOLID MATERIAL
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746423
NOZZLE PLUGS FOR A DELUGE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12729524
HANDSHOWER AND DOCKING SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12703558
DISPENSING SYSTEMS
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691316
MONITORING AND EXTINGUISHING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+21.6%)
3y 5m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1143 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month