Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/290,057

BATTERY CHARGING SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 09, 2023
Priority
May 14, 2021 — provisional 63/188,810 +1 more
Examiner
GRANT, ROBERT J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Briggs & Stratton LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
602 granted / 788 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
815
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
81.4%
+41.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 788 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-4, 6-17, and 21-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tenorio (USPUB 2022/0302719). As to Claim 1, Tenorio discloses a battery pack assembly, comprising: a battery pack, comprising: a housing receiving a plurality of rechargeable battery cells (Paragraph 65); a battery management system (BMS) in communication with the rechargeable battery cells and configured to monitor one or more operating characteristics of the rechargeable battery cells; a plurality of terminals extending outward from the housing and in electrical communication with the rechargeable battery cells to transmit electrical power between the rechargeable battery cells and a piece of equipment coupled with the plurality of terminals (Figure 1); a communication interface in communication with BMS and configured to transmit the operating characteristics of the rechargeable battery cells over a communication protocol and receive information from the piece of equipment coupled with the plurality of terminals over the communication protocol (Paragraph 67); and wherein the BMS is configured to determine a current limit of the battery pack based upon a maximum cell voltage of the rechargeable battery cells and adjust an input current of electrical power through the plurality of terminals to the rechargeable battery cells to adjust a current received by the battery pack toward the current limit (Paragraph 259, 342). As to Claim 3, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 1, wherein the operating characteristics of the rechargeable battery cells include at least one of a rechargeable battery cell temperature, a rechargeable battery cell voltage, a rechargeable battery cell voltage limit, and a cell current limit look up table (Paragraph 78). As to Claim 4, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 1, wherein the piece of equipment is a battery charger, and wherein the BMS is configured to communicate the current limit of the battery pack to the battery charger over the communication protocol to adjust an output parameter of the battery charger, wherein the output parameter is configured to adjust the current received by the battery pack toward the current limit (Paragraph 62). As to Claim 6, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 1, wherein the BMS is a first BMS, and wherein the battery pack assembly further comprises a second battery pack having a second BMS, wherein the first BMS is configured to transmit operational characteristics from the second battery to the piece of equipment over the communication protocol (Figure 1). As to Claim 7, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 6, wherein the second BMS is configured to transmit operational characteristics from the first battery to the piece of equipment over the communication protocol (Paragraph 70). As to Claim 8, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 1, wherein the BMS is configured to output an identification number of the battery pack over the communication protocol (Paragraph 102). As to Claim 9, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 1, wherein the communication protocol is controller area network bus (CANbus) (Paragraph 67). As to Claim 10, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 1, wherein the communication protocol is an over-the-air protocol (Paragraph 67). As to Claim 11, Tenorio discloses a battery pack assembly, comprising: a battery charger having a controller configured to adjust an output of the battery charger; a battery pack comprising: a plurality of rechargeable battery cells (Paragraph 65); a battery management system (BMS) in communication with the plurality of rechargeable battery cells and configured to monitor one or more operating characteristics of the plurality of rechargeable battery cells; a plurality of terminals in electrical communication with the plurality of rechargeable battery cells and configured to couple with the battery charger to receive and supply electrical power from the charger to the plurality of rechargeable battery cells (Figure 1); and a communication interface in communication with the BMS and configured to communicate with the controller over a communication protocol (Paragraph 67); wherein the controller is configured to adjust the output of the battery charger upon receiving an indication from the BMS, over the communication protocol, that an input current from the battery charger is less than an input current limit of the battery pack (Paragraph 259, 342). As to Claim 12, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 11, wherein the battery charger includes a battery bus configured to electrically couple with the battery pack and another battery pack in a parallel configuration (Figure 1). As to Claim 13, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 12, wherein the controller is configured to adjust an operational mode of the battery charger in response to receiving a signal from the battery pack that the input current limit of the battery pack is equal to zero (Paragraph 303). As to Claim 14, Tenorio discloses the battery pack assembly of claim 11, wherein the battery pack is configured to communicate operational characteristics of a second battery pack coupled to the battery charger using the communication protocol, wherein the controller is configured to adjust the output of the battery charger upon receiving an indication of the operational characteristics of the second battery pack from the first battery pack (Paragraph 62). As to Claim 15, Tenorio discloses the battery pack of claim 11, wherein the BMS is configured to determine the input current limit of the battery pack using a maximum cell voltage of the rechargeable battery cells (Paragraph 342). As to Claim 16, Tenorio discloses the battery pack of claim 11, wherein the communication protocol is an over-the-air protocol (Paragraph 67). As to Claim 17, Tenorio discloses the battery pack of claim 11, wherein the BMS is configured to monitor a temperature of the rechargeable battery cells, wherein the controller is configured to adjust the output of the battery charger upon receiving an indication from the BMS, over the communication protocol, that the temperature of the rechargeable battery cells exceeds a threshold temperature (Paragraph 76). As to Claim 21, Tenorio discloses a battery system, comprising: a battery charger electrically connected to a battery busbar; a first battery pack; a second battery pack; and a battery management system (BMS) in communication with the battery charger, the first battery pack, and the second battery pack, the BMS being configured to (Figure 1): assign a battery ID to the first battery pack and the second battery pack when the first battery pack and the second battery pack attempt to join the battery busbar; determine, based on the battery ID of the first battery pack and the second battery pack, if the first battery pack or the second battery pack is a primary battery pack; receive, from the primary battery pack, charge data from the first battery pack and the second battery pack; calculate limit data for the first battery pack and the second battery pack (Paragraphs 51-55); and control, based on comparing the limit data to the charge data, an output of the battery charger to the battery busbar (Paragraph 1117). As to Claim 22, Tenorio discloses the battery system of claim 21, wherein the battery management system is configured to store the charge data and the battery ID of the first battery pack and the second battery pack in a charge data table (Paragraph 138). As to Claim 23, Tenorio discloses the battery system of claim 22, wherein the battery management system is configured to reassign, in response to determining that the charge data for the first battery pack or the second battery pack does not match the battery ID associated with the first battery pack or the second battery pack, the battery ID of the first battery pack and the second battery pack (Paragraph 127). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT J GRANT whose telephone number is (571)270-5820. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am - 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Drew Dunn can be reached at (571)272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT GRANT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665433
COLLABORATIVE CHARGING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND LOGISTICS DEVICES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658724
DISTRIBUTED CHARGING STATION AND METHOD OF MANAGING THE SAME
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651918
MOBILE POWER SUPPLY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646968
A METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IN A HIGH-VOLTAGE POWER CONVERTER STATION AND A HIGH-VOLTAGE POWER CONVERTER STATION
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12643421
Device and Method for Moving a Connector of an Electric Vehicle Charger
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.3%)
2y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 788 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month