Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/290,220

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING NEUROLOGICAL CONDITIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 10, 2023
Priority
May 10, 2021 — provisional 63/186,389 +1 more
Examiner
SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
142 granted / 208 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
60 currently pending
Career history
263
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 208 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election of Species and Status of the Claims Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, comprising claims 100 and 107-109, as well as ‘L-NG-propyl-L-arginine (N-PLA)’ as the single specific active agent that reduces or inhibits nNOS activity in the response filed on March 12th 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 100 and 107-112 are pending. Claims 110-112 are withdrawn from further consideration as being directed towards a nonelected invention. Claims 100 and 107-109 are examined on their merits. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement filed on November 10th 2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and has been considered in full. A signed copy of references cited from the IDS is included with this Office Action. Claim Interpretation Claim 100 recites “A method for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder in a subject in need…” For the purpose of examination, the claim will be read as the more commonly used, “A method for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder in a subject in need thereof…” Duplicate Claims Applicant is advised that should claim 108 be found allowable, claim 109 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 100 and 107-109 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Montezuma (Montezuma et al., (2020). Anticompulsive-like effect of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in marble-burying test. Journal for Reproducibility in Neuroscience, 1, 1381). Claims 100 and 107-109 are directed towards the treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD)1 via administration of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) inhibitor, L-NG-propyl-L-arginine (N-PLA). Montezuma teaches administration of L-NG-propyl-L-arginine to decrease repetitive/obsessive behaviors (Montezuma, pg. 3, Figure A), and that such administration successfully decreases compulsive behaviors. As this meets the parameters of applicant’s definition of “treatment of ASD” (specification, pg. 27), Montezuma anticipates claims 100 and 107-109. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Anthony Seitz whose telephone number is (703)756-4657. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 AM ET - 5:00 PM ET M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Lundgren can be reached at (571)272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.J.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1629 /JEFFREY S LUNDGREN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1629 1 Defined by applicant as the improvement in at least one undesired parameter, characterization, or behavior associated with ASD, including repetitive behaviors (Specification, pg. 27)
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 10, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741974
Compounds Constituting C20-Modified Salinomycin Derivatives, a Method for Obtaining the Same, a Composition Containing the Same, a Use of Said Compounds and a Method for Obtaining an Intermediate Product
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741946
COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTION OR TREATMENT OF NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 2 SYNDROME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734160
METHODS FOR TREATING SYMPTOMS AND DISORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASES
5y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721845
THERAPEUTIC OR PROPHYLACTIC AGENT FOR CACHEXIA ACCOMPANIED BY GHRELIN RESISTANCE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715862
ANTAGONISTS OF THE MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR M4
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+27.0%)
3y 5m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 208 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month