Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/290,341

AUDIO CONTENT PROVIDING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 13, 2023
Priority
May 18, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021018819
Examiner
LEE, PING
Art Unit
2695
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
460 granted / 702 resolved
+3.5% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
725
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 702 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 43, 50 and 57 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 43, “the object” lacks clear antecedent basis. Claims 50 and 57 include the same issue. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 10, 19, 43, 46, 50, 53, 57 and 60 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kerns (US 6845321 B1). Regarding claim 1, Kerns discloses a notification providing apparatus comprising: at least one memory that is configured to store instructions (col. 9, lines 7-10); and at least one processor (CPU) that is configured to execute the instructions to: acquire updated user position information indicating a current position of a moving user (col. 5, lines 50-53; col. 11, lines 1-2); set, based on a reference position associated with a target (area, city or region as point of interest; col. 3, lines 36-60, and col. 4, lines 1 and 38, e.g.), a provision position at which a notification regarding the target is to be delivered to the moving user (“a user-set proximity to the point of interest”, col. 9, lines 15 and 17-20); and in response to the moving user reaching the provision position, output different notifications (different alerts, such as alert for park, and another alert for museum; col. 9, lines 40-41; also reads on turn-by-turn instructions as discussed on col. 9, lines 51-53 or additional instruction discussed on col. 9, lines 62-65, or about the sub-point of interest as discussed on col. 9, lines 66-67) to the moving user based on a distance between the current position of the moving user and the provision position and based on an attribute type of the target (col. 9, lines 29-31 and 36-39; col. 10, lines 63-67; the claimed “based on a distance … and based on an attribute type of the target” could be simplified as “based on condition A and based on condition B”; first interpretation: Kerns discloses output one notification, such as notification for a park, “based on A and based on B1” and output another notification, such as notification for a museum, “based on A and based on B2”; wherein the distance A is substantially zero, B1 is one attribute type of the target and B2 is another attribute type of the target; second interpretation: Kerns discloses output one notification, such as notification for a park, “based on A1 and based on B” and output another notification, such as sub-point of interest of the park, “based on A2 and based on B”; wherein the distance A1 is zero as the user is at the provision position and far from the point of interest, the distance A2 is non-zero as the user is no longer at the provision position and is reaching the actual point of interest), wherein the notification comprises content information, and wherein the content information comprises integrated information comprising both visual and audio components (col. 9, lines 2-3 and lines 41-53). Regarding claim 43, Kerns shows that the visual information containing an icon image related to the object (claims 17 and 18). Regarding claim 46, the user terminal reads on (a hand held or integrated with a car discussed in col. 5, lines 24-25; col. 8, lines 41-42 and 44). Claims 10, 50 and 53 correspond to claims 1, 43 and 46 discussed before. Most of limitations recited in claims 19, 57 and 60 correspond to those recited in claims 1, 43 and 46 discussed above. Kerns shows the non-transitory computer-readable medium (col. 9, lines 7-11). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 10 and 19 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PING LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-7522. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivian Chin can be reached at 571-272-7848. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PING LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Sep 11, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 11, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 28, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 21, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Mar 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745054
METHOD AND DEVICE OF ACTIVE NOISE REDUCTION FOR EARPHONE, EARPHONE, AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739588
PROGRESSIVE CALCULATION AND APPLICATION OF RENDERING CONFIGURATIONS FOR DYNAMIC APPLICATIONS
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12706077
Audio Limiter
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701378
Ambisonics Capture of Sound Field for Loudspeaker Calibration and Room Personalization
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12685507
STETHOSCOPE SYSTEMS AND ASSEMBLIES
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+29.5%)
3y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 702 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month