Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/290,655

THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE COMPOSITION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 19, 2024
Priority
Aug 25, 2021 — JP 2021-137489 +1 more
Examiner
OYER, ANDREW J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tatsuta Electric Wire & Cable Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
479 granted / 601 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
630
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 601 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 19 January 2024 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the Office. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12 August 2025 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the Office. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 4 December 2025 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the Office. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: The claim refers to “a rate of ((A)/(B))” and also “a content rate ((A)/(B))” when it appear that the word ratio should be used instead of rate. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shuhei et al. (JP2016191043, from the IDS filed 19 January 2024, hereinafter referred to as “Shuhei”). As to Claim 1: Shuhei teaches a thermally conductive composition comprising epoxy and a thermally conductive powder (Abstract). Shuhei further teaches that the epoxy comprises a polyfunctional epoxy resin, a flexible epoxy resin, and a monofunctional epoxy resin (Abstract). Wherein the flexible epoxy resin can be a dimer type epoxy resin [0039], the polyfunctional resin can be a glycidyl amine [0027], and the monofunctional epoxy resin can be a glycidyl ether resin [0041]. Shuhei additionally teaches that the thermally conductive powder can be present in an amount of about 900 parts based on 100 parts of resin [0024] and that the conductive filler can be half 1 micron and half 15 microns (Example 17) which would have a average ratio of 15 and a mass ratio of 1. Shuhei does not explicitly teach an example wherein the dimer acid epoxy resin is 1 to 30 parts and the liquid epoxy resin is 1 to 40 parts. However, Shuhei teaches that the amount of the dimer acid can be 1-45 parts [0039] and that the glycidyl ether epoxy (i.e., the liquid epoxy) is added in a way to control the viscosity and the glass transition point of the paste [0040]. At the time of filing, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the dimer acid epoxy resin Is 1 to 30 parts and the liquid epoxy resin is 1 to 40 parts because Shuhei teaches that this is an acceptable range for the dimer acid epoxy and that the glycidyl ether epoxy is used to control the viscosity and the glass transition point of the paste [0040]. As to Claim 2: Shuhei teaches the composition of claim 1 (supra). Shuhei further teaches that the composition can be a dimer acid modified epoxy which is a glycidyl ester epoxy resin which has been modified with dimer acid [0034]. As to Claim 3: Shuhei teaches the composition of claim 1 (supra). Shuhei further teaches that the composition can include glycidyl ether epoxy resin which is a liquid epoxy resin [0041]. As to Claim 4: Shuhei teaches the composition of claim 1 (supra). Shuhei further teaches that the composition can include glycidyl amine epoxy resin [0027]. As to Claim 5: Shuhei teaches the composition of claim 2 (supra). Shuhei further teaches that the composition can include glycidyl ether epoxy resin which is a liquid epoxy resin [0041]. As to Claim 6: Shuhei teaches the composition of claim 2 (supra). Shuhei further teaches that the composition can include glycidyl amine epoxy resin [0027]. As to Claim 7: Shuhei teaches the composition of claim 3 (supra). Shuhei further teaches that the composition can include glycidyl amine epoxy resin [0027]. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW J OYER whose telephone number is (571)270-0347. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Eashoo can be reached at (571)272-1197. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Andrew J. Oyer/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1767
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676349
METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL PRECURSOR MATERIAL AND POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR SECONDARY LITHIUM BATTERY, AND POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR SECONDARY LITHIUM BATTERY MANUFACTURED THEREBY
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668680
FIXING BELT
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662645
REFRIGERATION CYCLE APPARATUS, REFRIGERATING MACHINE OIL AND REFRIGERANT LEAKAGE PREVENTION AGENT
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655279
Ethylene/Alpha-Olefin Copolymer and Method for Preparing the Same
5y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654052
FIRE SUPPRESSANT
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 601 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month