Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/290,678

AUGMENTED REALITY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SPORTS DATA ANALYTICS SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 19, 2024
Examiner
WONG, JEFFREY KEITH
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sport Specs Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
351 granted / 540 resolved
-5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
576
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§103
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 540 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Brown et al., US 20200128902 (Brown). Regarding Claim 1.Brown discloses an augmented reality sports data analytics system comprising: a computerized ocular device wearable by a first user, the computerized ocular device having a display screen configured to display a data set within a proximal field of view of the first user without fully obstructing a distal field of view of the first user (Fig 1, elem 118; Abstract, para 96, 105, 121. A coach can use wearable glasses to observe athletes in which the wearable glasses can be provided with information about the athlete. The wearable glasses provided augmented reality display to the user for providing data related to athletes wearing sensors.); an athletic setting within the distal field of view of the first user, wherein at least one athlete is positioned within the athletic setting (Fig 4A-4B, 14A-14B); at least one sensor in communication with the computerized ocular device, the at least one sensor sensing data corresponding to the at least one athlete (Abstract, para 96, 108-109, 158); and a computerized data processing system in communication with the computerized ocular device and the at least one sensor, wherein the data sensed by the at least one sensor is processed by the computerized data processing system to produce analytical athletic data, wherein the analytical athletic data is populated into the data set on the display screen of the computerized ocular device (para 184, 189, 224. Data from sensors worn by the athletes that are related to the athletes are communicated to the ocular device.). Regarding Claims 2, 9 Brown further discloses, wherein the at least one sensor is positioned on or in the athletic setting, the at least one athlete, or a sporting implement (para 96, 108-109, 158). Regarding Claims 3, 10 Brown further discloses wherein the at least one sensor is at least one of: a visual sensor, a movement or position sensor, a proximity sensor, a thermal sensor, or a biometric sensor (para 162-168). Regarding Claims 4, 11 Brown further discloses wherein the analytical athletic data further comprises at least one of: data about the at least one athlete, a sporting implement, a field of play within the athletic setting, an environmental condition which can affect a sporting event (Fig 4A-4B, Fig 14A-14B; Abstract, para 170. Physical performance data of the athletes and an athletic setting are captured for analysis.). Regarding Claims 5, 12 Brown further discloses wherein the analytical athletic data corresponds to different athletes within an athletic team, whereby the data set visually provides a tile viewable on the display screen and corresponding to each of the different athletes (Fig 4A-4B, Fig 14A-14B; Abstract, para 121, 170). Regarding Claims 6, 13 Brown further discloses wherein the first user is a coach of the at least one athlete, wherein the analytical athletic data further comprises at least one of: in-game management data or training and practice scenarios data (Abstract, para 121, 160. Coaches being able to observe athletes and their performance is interpreted as being useful for training purposes.). Regarding Claims 7, 14 Brown further discloses wherein the coach can view the analytical athletic data on the display screen while viewing a field of play of the athletic setting on which the at least one athlete is located (Fig 14A-14B; Abstract, para 121, 170). Regarding Claim 8.Brown discloses a method for augmented reality sports data analytics, the method comprising: providing a computerized ocular device wearable by a first user, the computerized ocular device having a display screen configured to display a data set within a proximal field of view of the first user without fully obstructing a distal field of view of the first user (Fig 1, elem 118; Abstract, para 96, 105, 121. A coach can use wearable glasses to observe athletes in which the wearable glasses can be provided with information about the athlete. The wearable glasses provided augmented reality display to the user for providing data related to athletes wearing sensors.); directing the distal field of view of the first user to an athletic setting, wherein at least one athlete is positioned within the athletic setting (Fig 4A-4B, 14A-14B); sensing data with at least one sensor in communication with the computerized ocular device, wherein the data sensed corresponds to the at least one athlete (Abstract, para 96, 108-109, 158); and processing the data sensed in a computerized data processing system in communication with the computerized ocular device and the at least one sensor, wherein the data sensed by the at least one sensor is processed by the computerized data processing system to produce analytical athletic data (Abstract, para 113, 164, 168, 184. Data sensed is processed by the ocular device.); and populating the analytical athletic data into the data set on the display screen of the computerized ocular device, whereby the first user can visually identify the data set on the display screen (para 184, 189, 224. Data from sensors worn by the athletes that are related to the athletes are communicated to the ocular device.). Regarding Claim 15 Brown further discloses method of claim 8, further comprising: providing the at least one athlete with a second computerized ocular device wearable by the at least one athlete, the second computerized ocular device having a display screen configured to display a data set within a proximal field of view of the at least one athlete without fully obstructing a distal field of view of the at least one athlete (Fig 4B, 14B; Abstract, para 121, 171); and sending at least one training exercise to the second computerized ocular device of the at least one athlete, wherein the at least one athlete visually sees a 3D model in the display screen of the second computerized ocular device, wherein the 3D model imitates an opponent of the at least one athlete (Fig 4B. The figure depicts two athletes wearing their respective augmented reality glasses.). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY KEITH WONG whose telephone number is (571)270-3003. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at (571) 270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFREY K WONG/Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602968
FREE GAME MULTIPLIER FOR VIDEO KENO GAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602969
GAMING SYSTEM PROVIDING GROUP-BASED AWARDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594462
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACKING SPORTS PLAYERS TO GENERATE AND APPLY RECEIVER TRACKING METRICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592127
GAMING SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH A PERSISTENT ELEMENT FEATURE INCLUDING A SLIDING RANGE COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592130
GAMING SYSTEMS AND METHODS USING MULTI-FEATURE AWARD ACCUMULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+28.7%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 540 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month