Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/290,850

RADIO TERMINAL AND METHOD THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 22, 2024
Examiner
KIM, WON TAE C
Art Unit
2414
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
239 granted / 270 resolved
+30.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
293
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 270 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The preliminary amendment filed 1/22/24 has been entered. Claims 35-47 are pending. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed 1/22/24 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 35, 38-39, 41, 44-45, and 47 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hosseini et al., US 2022/0046664, (“Hosseini”). Independent Claims Regarding independent claim 1, Hosseini teaches “A first radio terminal (Fig. 2, UE 120 and Fig. 7, First UE) comprising: at least one radio transceiver (Fig. 2, demod/mod 254a); and at least one processor (Fig. 2, processor 280) coupled to the at least one radio transceiver and configured to: transmit inter-terminal coordination to a second radio terminal (Fig. 7, step 740; paragraph no. 0035, “The first UE may identify a set of resources in a selection window based at least in part on receiving the inter-UE coordination request and based at least in part on a sensing operation, and may transmit an inter-UE coordination message to the second UE indicating the set of resources”; see also, paragraph no. 0093); and receive, from the second radio terminal, information indicating a request for inter-terminal coordination (Fig. 7, step 720; paragraph no. 0035, “For example, the second UE, or a base station, may transmit an inter-UE coordination request that the first UE perform an inter-UE coordination operation”; see also, paragraph no. 0088), wherein the inter-terminal coordination information includes a first set of preferred resources for sidelink transmission by the second radio terminal or a second set of non- preferred resources for sidelink transmission by the second radio terminal (paragraph no. 0035, “The first UE may identify a set of resources in a selection window based at least in part on receiving the inter-UE coordination request and based at least in part on a sensing operation, and may transmit an inter-UE coordination message to the second UE indicating the set of resources. The set of resources can be available resources and/or unavailable resources. The second UE may select a resource based at least in part on the set of resources and may communicate on the selected resource”; the claimed “preferred resources” and “non-preferred resources” read on the available resources and the unavailable resources, respectively; see also, paragraph no. 0092, “In this case, the first UE may transmit information indicating at least one of the unavailable resources (e.g., non-preferred resources) or the set of available sidelink resources (e.g., preferred resources)”), and the request includes information indicating a resource reservation interval for defining a plurality of candidate resources from which the first radio terminal selects the first set or the second set” (paragraph no. 0090, “a length of the selection window may be indicated by the second UE or by the base station (or a relay associated with the base station). For example, the inter-UE coordination request may indicate the length of the selection window”; see paragraph nos. 0035 and 0089 which disclose that the first UE selects the available and/or unavailable resources from candidate resources during the selection window indicated by the inter-UE coordination request message). Regarding independent claims 41 and 47, these independent claims are corresponding method and computer readable medium claims of the apparatus claim 1 and recite similar subject matter. As such, the rationale behind the above rejection of claim 1 applies with equal force to these independent claims and as further amplified below to highlight the minor differences between the claims. Regarding further independent claim 47, see Fig. 2, memory 282 for the “non-transitory computer readable medium.” Dependent Claims Regarding claims 38 and 44, Hosseini teaches “wherein the inter-terminal coordination information is considered by the second radio terminal in resource selection for sidelink transmission by the second radio terminal” (Fig. 7, steps 740 and 750 and their respective written descriptions; see also, paragraph no. 0035). Regarding claims 39 and 45, Hosseini teaches “wherein the at least one processor is configured to transmit the inter-terminal coordination information to the second radio terminal in response to receiving the request” (Fig. 7, steps 720 and 740 and their respective written descriptions). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 36-37, 40, 42-43, and 46 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claims 36 and 42, the prior art of record does not teach or fairly suggest the claim limitations “wherein the inter-terminal coordination information indicates a trust level of each resource in the first or second set, and the at least one processor is configured to: perform sensing to detect resources reserved for sidelink transmission by one or more other radio terminals; set, to a first level, the trust level of a first preferred or non-preferred resource determined based on sidelink control information actually received from another radio terminal during the sensing; and set, to a second level lower than the first level, the trust level of a second preferred or non-preferred resource determined based on hypothetical sidelink control information that could have been received in a slot that the first radio terminal was unable to monitor during the sensing.” Claims 37 and 43 depend from claims 36 and 42, respectively. Regarding claims 40 and 46, the prior art of record does not teach or fairly suggest the claim limitations “wherein the at least one processor is configured to provide a Medium Access Control (MAC) layer, and a physical layer providing physical layer procedures, wherein the MAC layer is configured to request the physical layer for a report of a subset of resources, and the MAC layer is configured to indicate to the physical layer whether the report is for resource selection for sidelink transmission by the first radio terminal or for inter- terminal coordination.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WON TAE C. KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-1812. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edan Orgad can be reached at (571)272-7884. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WON TAE C KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2414
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598446
SERVICE MAINTAINING METHOD IN SIDELINK RELAY SYSTEM AND RELAY DEVICE, AND MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598630
USER EQUIPMENT AND RESOURCE SELECTION METHOD IN SIDELINK COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592809
METHOD FOR PERFORMING MT OPERATION AND DU OPERATION BY IAB NODE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND DEVICE THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593313
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND TERMINAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588009
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING INTER-UE COORDINATION INFORMATION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (-3.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 270 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month