Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/290,927

METHOD FOR PRODUCING A VEGETABLE PLANAR TEXTILE STRUCTURE

Final Rejection §102§Other
Filed
Jan 22, 2024
Priority
Jul 28, 2021 — DE 10 2021 119 667.1 +2 more
Examiner
MINSKEY, JACOB T
Art Unit
1748
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Revoltech GmbH
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
579 granted / 836 resolved
+4.3% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
882
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 836 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant has amended the claims to require specific types of fibers and additives. The amendments filed overcomes the previously applied 112 rejection in regards to the lack of antecedent basis. Applicant argues that the term “un-shortened fibers” is supported by the instant specification and intended to mean a fiber than has not been shortened. With this definition in mind provided in the Remarks on 6/19/2026, the 112 rejection will be withdrawn. Applicant argues the previously applied reference in regard to the amended claims. Applicant argues that Kotter teaches the use of recycled leather fibers (or animal derived fibers) while the claims now require it to be vegetable, natural, or cellulose. Applicant further argues that the present application excludes animal fibers from being utilized. In response to applicant's argument that the references fail to show certain features of the invention, it is noted that the features upon which applicant relies (i.e., exclusion of animal fibers) are not recited in the rejected claim(s). Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). The Examiner acknowledges the intention of instant specification to utilizing only natural fibers that are vegetable based, but the claims do not have such a restriction as currently written. The claims require that a pulp has at least one non-synthetic fiber materials from vegetable, cellulose, or natural fiber textiles. There is nothing to restrict the presence of other non-synthetic fibers from being present. It is noted that if the claims were amended to restrict the inclusion of animal fibers, then the arguments would be found to be persuasive, but as this argument is not commensurate in scope with the claims as currently written, the Examiner cannot withdraw the outstanding rejection. The updated claims are met by the Kotter reference as will be addressed in the rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-11 and 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Kotter et al, US Patent Publication 2005/0202268. Regarding claims 1, 10-11, and 17, Kotter teaches a process for the production of a non-synthetic textile surface structure [0010, 0015, and 0018], comprising the steps of: a) providing a pulp (leather pulp [0018]) comprising at least one liquid (water [0021-0028]), at least one non-synthetic fiber material selected from vegetable fiber material, cellulose, textiles made of natural fibers, or a mixture thereof (see claim 37 for cellulose fibers being included), at least one binder [0020] comprising at least one natural latex [0037], and at least one process additive (aluminum sulphate see example 1); and b) producing a non-synthetic textile surface structure [0027] by at least partially separating the liquid [0028] from the pulp. Regarding claim 2, Kotter further teaches wherein step a) comprises one or more (see 112 rejection above) of the following sub-steps: a1) providing the non-synthetic fiber material, wherein the non-synthetic fiber material comprises or consists of shortened and/or un-shortened fibers [0028]; a2) adding the at least one liquid, to the non-synthetic fiber material [0026]; a3) mechanically processing the non-synthetic fiber material [0018]; a4) cleaning the non-synthetic fiber material; a5) adding at least one binder [0020]; a6) adding at least one process additive (see example 1); a7) adding at least one auxiliary agent (surface finish); or a8) production of the pulp [0013-0018]. Regarding claim 3. Kotter further teaches wherein step b) comprises one or more of the following sub steps (see 112 rejection above): b1) applying the pulp provided in step a) to a liquid-permeable carrier element [0021] in for at least partial separation of the at least one liquid [0022]; b2) producing a pulp layer comprising the pulp from step a), wherein the at least one liquid, in particular the water, is at least partially removed from the pulp layer [0022]; b3) drying the pulp layer [0021-0022]; b4) carrying out a molding process on the pulp layer, in particular on the dried pulp layer, to obtain the non-synthetic textile surface structure [0021]; or b5) adding at least one auxiliary agent [0021]. Regarding claim 4. Kotter further teaches wherein the mechanical preparation in step a3) comprises splitting the non-synthetic fiber material into fibers, or fibrillating it [0006]. Regarding claim 5. Kotter further teaches wherein the at least one process additive is selected from the group consisting of polysaccharides, starch, modified starch, cationically modified starch, cellulose or derivatives thereof, carboxymethylated cellulose, cellulose acetate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose aluminum sulphate (see example 1) and mixtures thereof. Regarding claim 6. Kotter further teaches wherein the at least one binder further comprises synthetic latex (claim 28 teaches mixed polymers as part of the binder). Regarding claim 6. Kotter further teaches wherein the at least one auxiliary agent is selected from plasticizers, fillers, dyes, pigments, UV protection agents, hydrophobicizing agents, antimicrobial agents, flame retardants, wet strength agents, sizing agents, or mixtures thereof (dyes [0018]). Regarding claim 8. Kotter further teaches wherein the non-synthetic fiber material is selected from vegetable fiber material, natural fibers, cellulose, recycled cellulose, textiles made of natural fibers, recycled textiles made of natural fibers, or mixtures thereof [0017]. Regarding claim 9. Kotter further teaches wherein the method further comprises the following step: c) carrying out a post-treatment on the non-synthetic textile surface structure produced in step b) (surface polishing [0021]). Regarding claim 18, Kotter further teaches wherein the at least one auxiliary agent is selected from a dye [0018]. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB T MINSKEY whose telephone number is (571)270-7003. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-6 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abbas Rashid can be reached at 5712707475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACOB T. MINSKEY Examiner Art Unit 1741 /JACOB T MINSKEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1748
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other
Jun 19, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750222
CHEMICAL SIGNATURE MANAGER
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742289
ADJUSTING ROLLS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729484
SHEET SEPARATING APPARATUS AND SHEET MANUFACTURING APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723351
SHEET MANUFACTURING APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723352
A METHOD FOR PRODUCING A FILM COMPRISING MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE, AND A FILM COMPRISING MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.1%)
2y 10m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 836 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month