Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/290,975

MULTILAYER COMPOSITE WITH NONWOVEN TOUGHENING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 22, 2024
Priority
Jul 26, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021108422
Examiner
SALVATORE, LYNDA
Art Unit
1789
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Dow Global Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
631 granted / 988 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1052
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
73.5%
+33.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 988 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment 1. Applicants amended the claims in the response to the restriction requirement dated 11/21/25 to add new claims 16-19. Claims 16-19 have been added as requested. Election/Restrictions 2. Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-9 and 16-19 in the reply filed on 11/21/25 is acknowledged. Claims 10-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected process, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 4. Claim(s) 1-9 and 16-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Nishimura et al., US. 6,995,099 in view of Zhou et al., US 20210404098 A1. With regard to claims 1,9, and 16-19, the patent issued to Nishimura et al., teach a composite comprising first and second reinforcing layers and a non-woven disposed between said layers (title, abstract, column 4, 65, column 7, 20-35 and column 9, 55-65). Said reinforcing layers are made from fibers such as glass or carbon (column 5, 1-10). Nishimura et al., teach that the fibers of the reinforcing layers can be oriented at angles ranging from 0-90°degrees (column 6, 40-50). With regard to the claimed thermoset resin, Nishimura et al., teach impregnating the layers with epoxy resin (column 10, 1-10, column 10, 35-column 11, 10 and column 12, 10-20). With regard to the claimed non-woven, Nishimura teach that the non-woven layer can be spun-bond non-woven and can further comprise sheath/core bicomponent fibers (column 5, 55-column 6, 5 and column 8, 10-column 9, 10). Nishimura teach that the complex fiber reinforcing material exhibits excellent shaping properties and impact resistance after molding (column 2, 20-30). Nishimura teach a spun-bond non-woven comprising bicomponent fibers. Nishimura fails to teach the claimed bicomponent sheath/core polymeric materials. The patent issued to Zhou et al., teach a spunbond nonwoven fabric comprising a purity of continuous bicomponent fibers having a sheath/core configuration ionomer of ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid copolymer forms the sheath and polyamide forms the core. Said non-woven can be used to form various impact resistant composites (title, abstract and paragraph 0003). The prior art of Nishimura et al., and Zhou et al., are considered analogous since they are both concerned with forming similar articles. The Examiner is of the position that it would be within the skill of an ordinary worker in the art to form the sheath/core fibers in the spun-bond non-woven fabric Nishimura et al., with the sheath/core bicomponent fibers comprising the ionomer of ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid copolymer as the sheath component. The modification involves the mere substitution of one material with another material known for its suitability as sheath component polymer in sheath/core bicomponent fibers and would yield a predictable variation whose application is well within the skill of the art. With regard to claims 3, 4 and 5, Zhou et al., teach an ionomer of ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid copolymer used herein is a copolymer of ethylene and (meth)acrylic acid, wherein the acid content in monomer of the ionomer of ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid copolymer ranges from about 1 wt. % to about 20 wt. %, and the acid groups are neutralized by sodium cations or zinc cations with neutralization level ranging from about 0.1% to about 60%. With regard to claim 6, Zhou et al., teach that the ionomer of ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid copolymer used herein has a melt flow rate (MFR) of about 12-60 g/10 min, as measured in accordance with ASTM D1238 at 190° C. with a 2160 g load. With regard to claims 7 and 8, in one embodiment, the bicomponent continuous fiber has an average fiber diameter of about 1-100 μm, or about 2-50 μm. Conclusion 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LYNDA SALVATORE whose telephone number is (571)272-1482. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marla McConnell can be reached at 571-270-7692. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LYNDA SALVATORE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 11, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12612719
PILE KNIT FABRIC FOR INTERIOR MATERIALS OF VEHICLES, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME AND MANUFACTURING MACHINE OF PILE KNIT FABRIC
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12595595
PHOTOCHROMIC LIQUID CRYSTAL ELECTROSPUN COAXIAL POLYMER FIBERS
4y 6m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583191
RESIN FORMED ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING RESIN FORMED ARTICLE
4y 6m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583530
CONSTRUCTION OF A VEHICLE FLOOR GARNISH
3y 3m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564658
TISSUE SUBSTITUTE MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR TISSUE REPAIR
2y 4m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+19.2%)
3y 6m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 988 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month